correction; basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^-(iwt+pi/3) = coswt (when cos wt = cos -wt)
2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > Hi Adrie > Net terug van muziek sessie. Maak je geen zorgen over mijn opslingeringen. > > You're worries about my state of resonance rise gives me the idea that you > seem to understand the direction i want to go to. I am taking some more > time to write a propper answer to your mail. > > But for the time being i can tell you my findings of the mu state in the > wave equation. > > The resonance rise situation is dangerous because you are than suceptable > to energy absorbtion. I don't yet know what kind of Energy but it causes > your sensation levels to rise above sustainable levels. > > Famous mechanical example of resonance rise too! high: tecoma bridge > resonance rise! <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zczJXSxnw> > > Like this bridge can distort and break a subconscious mind can > distort(psychosis) and break(schizofrenia, dissosiation disorders) > > > I believe i found the mu state in resonanance theory but have never been > able to communicate it with anyone. > > basic resonance rise equation: e^iwt + e^-iwt = 2coswt > > basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^(-iwt+pi/3) = coswt (when > cos wt = cos -wt) > > > Have fun! > > met vriendelijke groeten Eddo Rats > > > > > > > > > ** > > > 2013/4/6 ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]> > >> Eddo, read learrn and chill-out a bit. >> >> Mu state . Zen and the art.......someone quoting Roberts observations on >> wiki. >> >> *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)*< >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)> >> >> Good but no good article. >> >> Under “unasking the question” there is a snippet from Zen where Robert >> makes a numer of big mistakes.The entire thinkingline of Robert about >> circuits and on/off caracteristics is wrong. >> >> Computercircuits are never in a Mu-state.Only on first sight they seem to >> be awaiting for zero power or power on as in on/off.What Robert is >> depicting is a normal light circuit,a bulb, power on or of light on or off >> , zero or not zero. >> >> Integrated computer circuits have three different states, and zero or non >> zero is not one of them. >> >> High impendance (!) >> >> Under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_impedance >> >> You will be able to find digital electronics and analogue electronics. >> >> Now it is very easy to find where Robert goes wrong ,In digital >> electronics >> and computer circuits there are three different states, and they are not >> Mu. >> >> Robert tought that analogue electronics have the same properties of the >> digital ones >> >> Not being an electronic engineer,Robert will always miss the word he was >> looking for >> >> to make his entire point of view correct....”resonance rise” this was the >> term he missed. >> >> and to understand this >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance_(alternating-current_circuits) >> >> Now my point for you Eddo >> >> You are taking the term “resonance rise” out of the technical connotation >> and understand it as “Opslingering”but this connotation makes me realise >> where you want to point out with your wave equations, you are trying to >> avoid your own mu states, >> >> but fail to find the words, like Pirsig.Pirsig avoided his own Mu states! >> >> The trick is in the imaginary slow-motion of indiana jones his whip, the >> resonance rise in de wave is reflecting back to the hand that is on the >> end >> of the whip,but the reflection moves up in amplitude depending on the >> lenght of the whip and the induced amplitude in the first place. >> >> This kind of reasearch is what you should be performing Eddo,instead of >> pissing of Mr Buchanan. >> >> en Blijf weg van “opslingering”!--resonance rise, en de stilte van de Mu. >> >> Study these things before you will become Mu only, there is enough to >> grasp. >> >> >> >> Groet , Adrie >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/4/6 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> >> >> > @dumb >> > Typical you to pick this part being my soft spot as someone with a >> > psychiatric hystory being honest about it. You are not a philosopher >> but a >> > moq philosophologist a politician and a narcistic priest that wants me >> out >> > of his church. Good luck with your church. You win! :D probably dropped >> > mathematics at highschool. This is that above the door >> > Plato<http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Plato.html> >> > inscribed >> > "Let no one who is not a geometer enter" >> > >> > My advice to you, read ZMM where pirsig goes to chicago again and again >> and >> > again and again. Look in the mirror and think very hard. To me you're >> a >> > lost case but never give up hope . >> > >> > >> > 2013/4/5 david buchanan <[email protected]> >> > >> > > Eddo answered the million dollar question: What's the point? >> > > >> > > >> > > ...Understanding this relationship became even more important during >> > > psychotic episodes when i noticed that the amounts of sensation i had >> to >> > > deal with became so high that it had a distorting effect on the >> > personality >> > > i was (as a collection of concepts in my subconscious mind). This >> made me >> > > even work harder to be able to understand this relationship. Now >> after >> > > twenty years i thought of a way to understand this, and this gives me >> > tools >> > > in my head to regulate myself when the sensations tend to become to >> high. >> > > So "the point" to me has very personal value... >> > > P.S. Lets continue this discussion in the new thread i made "Quality >> > > defined!" because we are hijacking this thread which was started with >> > > another purpose by somebody else. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > dmb says: >> > > >> > > >> > > Sorry, but I'm not interested. Since Pirsig says (about a thousand >> times) >> > > that Quality can't be defined and since your interested in mostly >> > yourself, >> > > I don't think you're even talking about the MOQ. That's the point and >> > > purpose of this forum and I'm not qualified to help you regulate your >> > > sensations anyway. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list >> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> > > Archives: >> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list >> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> > Archives: >> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> parser >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
