[email protected]> 
<cafs_yj6+c3-gsa3xysx-rq3twqyx0ybk+rv11wnonn4vkgr...@mail.gmail.com> 
<CAO6PK-_XTn=0=vWyKAMcFLnitksk+gp5Hw5H=vgpvxue3vj...@mail.gmail.com>
To: [email protected]
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)

Eddo, are you kidding?

Have you considered checking up the results from the research of Wilhelm Reich?

Frank Zappa used a chicken to measure it? :-) in the story of Uncle Meat I 
think. Right Horse?

careful with thing

Jan Anders


9 apr 2013 kl. 02.37 skrev Eddo Rats:

> @ Adrie
> 
> These are all the potential resonance rise points although I think that in
> case of exitement you dont go beyond a fase shift 90 degrees. I think that
> on every static MOQ level there energy release effects take place.
> 
> On a organic quality level i think that a sexual orgasm causes a discreet
> amount of energy loss at the point of 90 degrees fase shift.
> 
> I would like to analyse data of men of different age groups. I would like
> to know their hartrate at rest and their hart rate when having an orgasm.
> 
> Mine is 104/120 =  0,86666666666666667   inverse sinus is about 30 degrees
> The difference between the stable 60 degrees fase shift state and the
> resonance rise 90 degrees fase shift state.
> 
> Coincedence??????????  only scientific data can tell!
> 
> 
> On a social level the same  kind of effects happen. I think that laughing
> is a sort of energy release of discreet amounts after each other
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/4/8 ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]>
> 
>> 180° 90° 0° 90° 180
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]>
>> 
>>> @Adrie
>>> Correction again1:
>>> 
>>> I thought my phase shifted formula represented the mu state according to
>>> Pirsig but I am Not sure now
>>> 
>>> e^i(wt+pi/3) + e^-i(wt+pi/3) = coswt    (when cos wt = cos -wt)
>>> .
>>> This is the stable state, like a 3 phase motor or generator
>>> 
>>> When you add energy(increasing rotation speed, exitement, increase
>>> heartrate) you come at a potential resonance rise point at phase +pi/2 or
>>> +90° This is Technally the same potential resonance rice point as at
>> phase
>>> 0pi or 2pi where you potentially come by energy and rotation speed
>>> reduction. than this point must represent wu and at 90 degrees must be
>> wei.
>>> than sixty degrees must be the middle stable way. I am just speculating
>>> here, other poeple can have other opinions.
>>> 
>>> Greetings Eddo Rats  =4th post so enough for today. :D
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>>> correction again; mu state: e^i(wt+pi/3) + e^-i(wt+pi/3) = coswt
>> (when
>>>> cos wt = cos -wt)
>>>> 
>>>> Just woke up this can't be right, the math in my head is graphical,
>>> that's
>>>> why these errors. I am an Engineer, not a Mathematiciam :D
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2013/4/7 Eddo Rats <[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>>> correction; basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^-(iwt+pi/3) =
>>>>> coswt    (when cos wt = cos -wt)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Adrie
>>>>>> Net terug van muziek sessie. Maak je geen zorgen over mijn
>>>>>> opslingeringen.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You're worries about my state of resonance rise gives me the idea
>> that
>>>>>> you seem to understand the direction i want to go to. I am  taking
>> some
>>>>>> more time to write a propper answer to your mail.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But for the time being i can tell you my findings of the mu state in
>>> the
>>>>>> wave equation.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The resonance rise situation is dangerous because you are than
>>>>>> suceptable to energy absorbtion. I don't yet know what kind of Energy
>>> but
>>>>>> it causes your sensation levels to rise above sustainable levels.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Famous mechanical example of resonance rise too! high: tecoma bridge
>>>>>> resonance rise! <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zczJXSxnw>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Like this bridge can distort and break  a subconscious mind can
>>>>>> distort(psychosis) and break(schizofrenia, dissosiation disorders)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I believe i found the mu state in resonanance theory but have never
>>> been
>>>>>> able to communicate it with anyone.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> basic resonance rise equation:  e^iwt + e^-iwt = 2coswt
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^(-iwt+pi/3) = coswt
>> (when
>>>>>> cos wt = cos -wt)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Have fun!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> met vriendelijke groeten Eddo Rats
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> **
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2013/4/6 ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Eddo, read learrn and chill-out a bit.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mu state . Zen and the art.......someone quoting Roberts
>> observations
>>> on
>>>>>>> wiki.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)*<
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Good but no good article.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Under “unasking the question” there is a snippet from Zen where
>> Robert
>>>>>>> makes a numer of big mistakes.The entire thinkingline of Robert
>> about
>>>>>>> circuits and on/off caracteristics is wrong.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Computercircuits are never in a Mu-state.Only on first sight they
>> seem
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be awaiting for zero power or power on as in on/off.What Robert is
>>>>>>> depicting is a normal light circuit,a bulb, power on or of light on
>> or
>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>> , zero or not zero.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Integrated computer circuits have three different states, and zero
>> or
>>>>>>> non
>>>>>>> zero is not one of them.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> High impendance (!)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_impedance
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You will be able to find digital electronics and analogue
>> electronics.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Now it is very easy to find where Robert goes wrong ,In digital
>>>>>>> electronics
>>>>>>> and computer circuits there are three different states, and they are
>>>>>>> not Mu.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Robert tought that analogue electronics have the same properties of
>>> the
>>>>>>> digital ones
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Not being an electronic engineer,Robert will always miss the word he
>>> was
>>>>>>> looking for
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> to make his entire point of view correct....”resonance rise” this
>> was
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> term he missed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> and to understand this
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance_(alternating-current_circuits)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Now my point for you Eddo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You are taking the term “resonance rise” out of the technical
>>>>>>> connotation
>>>>>>> and understand it as “Opslingering”but this connotation makes me
>>> realise
>>>>>>> where you want to point out with your wave equations, you are trying
>>> to
>>>>>>> avoid your own mu states,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> but fail to find the words, like Pirsig.Pirsig avoided his own Mu
>>>>>>> states!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The trick is in the imaginary slow-motion of indiana jones his whip,
>>> the
>>>>>>> resonance rise in de wave is reflecting back to the hand that is on
>>> the
>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>> of the whip,but the reflection moves up in amplitude depending on
>> the
>>>>>>> lenght of the whip and the induced amplitude in the first place.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This kind of reasearch is what you should be performing Eddo,instead
>>> of
>>>>>>> pissing of Mr Buchanan.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> en Blijf weg van “opslingering”!--resonance rise, en de stilte van
>> de
>>>>>>> Mu.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Study these things before you will become Mu only, there is enough
>> to
>>>>>>> grasp.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Groet , Adrie
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2013/4/6 Eddo Rats <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> @dumb
>>>>>>>> Typical you to pick this part being my soft spot as someone with a
>>>>>>>> psychiatric hystory being honest about it. You are not a
>> philosopher
>>>>>>> but a
>>>>>>>> moq philosophologist a politician and a narcistic priest that
>> wants
>>>>>>> me out
>>>>>>>> of his church. Good luck with your church. You win! :D  probably
>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>> mathematics at highschool. This is that above the door
>>>>>>>> Plato<
>> http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Plato.html
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> inscribed
>>>>>>>> "Let no one who is not a geometer enter"
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> My advice to you, read ZMM where pirsig goes to chicago again and
>>>>>>> again and
>>>>>>>> again and again. Look in   the mirror and think very hard. To me
>>>>>>> you're a
>>>>>>>> lost case but never give up hope .
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2013/4/5 david buchanan <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Eddo answered the million dollar question: What's the point?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ...Understanding this relationship became even more important
>>> during
>>>>>>>>> psychotic episodes when i noticed that the amounts of sensation
>> i
>>>>>>> had to
>>>>>>>>> deal with became so high that it had a distorting effect on the
>>>>>>>> personality
>>>>>>>>> i was (as a collection of concepts in my subconscious mind).
>> This
>>>>>>> made me
>>>>>>>>> even work harder to be able to understand this relationship.
>> Now
>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>> twenty years i thought of a way to understand this, and this
>> gives
>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>> tools
>>>>>>>>> in my head to regulate myself when the sensations tend to become
>>> to
>>>>>>> high.
>>>>>>>>> So "the point" to me has very personal value...
>>>>>>>>> P.S. Lets continue this discussion in the new thread i made
>>> "Quality
>>>>>>>>> defined!" because we are hijacking this thread which was started
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> another purpose by somebody else.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> dmb says:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sorry, but I'm not interested. Since Pirsig says (about a
>> thousand
>>>>>>> times)
>>>>>>>>> that Quality can't be defined and since your interested in
>> mostly
>>>>>>>> yourself,
>>>>>>>>> I don't think you're even talking about the MOQ. That's the
>> point
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> purpose of this forum and I'm not qualified to help you regulate
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> sensations anyway.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>>>>>> Archives:
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>>>>> Archives:
>>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> parser
>>>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>>>> Archives:
>>>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> parser
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to