180° 90° 0° 90° 180
2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > @Adrie > Correction again1: > > I thought my phase shifted formula represented the mu state according to > Pirsig but I am Not sure now > > e^i(wt+pi/3) + e^-i(wt+pi/3) = coswt (when cos wt = cos -wt) > . > This is the stable state, like a 3 phase motor or generator > > When you add energy(increasing rotation speed, exitement, increase > heartrate) you come at a potential resonance rise point at phase +pi/2 or > +90° This is Technally the same potential resonance rice point as at phase > 0pi or 2pi where you potentially come by energy and rotation speed > reduction. than this point must represent wu and at 90 degrees must be wei. > than sixty degrees must be the middle stable way. I am just speculating > here, other poeple can have other opinions. > > Greetings Eddo Rats =4th post so enough for today. :D > > > 2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > > > correction again; mu state: e^i(wt+pi/3) + e^-i(wt+pi/3) = coswt (when > > cos wt = cos -wt) > > > > Just woke up this can't be right, the math in my head is graphical, > that's > > why these errors. I am an Engineer, not a Mathematiciam :D > > > > > > 2013/4/7 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > > > >> correction; basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^-(iwt+pi/3) = > >> coswt (when cos wt = cos -wt) > >> > >> > >> 2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Hi Adrie > >>> Net terug van muziek sessie. Maak je geen zorgen over mijn > >>> opslingeringen. > >>> > >>> You're worries about my state of resonance rise gives me the idea that > >>> you seem to understand the direction i want to go to. I am taking some > >>> more time to write a propper answer to your mail. > >>> > >>> But for the time being i can tell you my findings of the mu state in > the > >>> wave equation. > >>> > >>> The resonance rise situation is dangerous because you are than > >>> suceptable to energy absorbtion. I don't yet know what kind of Energy > but > >>> it causes your sensation levels to rise above sustainable levels. > >>> > >>> Famous mechanical example of resonance rise too! high: tecoma bridge > >>> resonance rise! <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zczJXSxnw> > >>> > >>> Like this bridge can distort and break a subconscious mind can > >>> distort(psychosis) and break(schizofrenia, dissosiation disorders) > >>> > >>> > >>> I believe i found the mu state in resonanance theory but have never > been > >>> able to communicate it with anyone. > >>> > >>> basic resonance rise equation: e^iwt + e^-iwt = 2coswt > >>> > >>> basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^(-iwt+pi/3) = coswt (when > >>> cos wt = cos -wt) > >>> > >>> > >>> Have fun! > >>> > >>> met vriendelijke groeten Eddo Rats > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ** > >>> > >>> > >>> 2013/4/6 ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> Eddo, read learrn and chill-out a bit. > >>>> > >>>> Mu state . Zen and the art.......someone quoting Roberts observations > on > >>>> wiki. > >>>> > >>>> *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)*< > >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)> > >>>> > >>>> Good but no good article. > >>>> > >>>> Under “unasking the question” there is a snippet from Zen where Robert > >>>> makes a numer of big mistakes.The entire thinkingline of Robert about > >>>> circuits and on/off caracteristics is wrong. > >>>> > >>>> Computercircuits are never in a Mu-state.Only on first sight they seem > >>>> to > >>>> be awaiting for zero power or power on as in on/off.What Robert is > >>>> depicting is a normal light circuit,a bulb, power on or of light on or > >>>> off > >>>> , zero or not zero. > >>>> > >>>> Integrated computer circuits have three different states, and zero or > >>>> non > >>>> zero is not one of them. > >>>> > >>>> High impendance (!) > >>>> > >>>> Under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_impedance > >>>> > >>>> You will be able to find digital electronics and analogue electronics. > >>>> > >>>> Now it is very easy to find where Robert goes wrong ,In digital > >>>> electronics > >>>> and computer circuits there are three different states, and they are > >>>> not Mu. > >>>> > >>>> Robert tought that analogue electronics have the same properties of > the > >>>> digital ones > >>>> > >>>> Not being an electronic engineer,Robert will always miss the word he > was > >>>> looking for > >>>> > >>>> to make his entire point of view correct....”resonance rise” this was > >>>> the > >>>> term he missed. > >>>> > >>>> and to understand this > >>>> > >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance_(alternating-current_circuits) > >>>> > >>>> Now my point for you Eddo > >>>> > >>>> You are taking the term “resonance rise” out of the technical > >>>> connotation > >>>> and understand it as “Opslingering”but this connotation makes me > realise > >>>> where you want to point out with your wave equations, you are trying > to > >>>> avoid your own mu states, > >>>> > >>>> but fail to find the words, like Pirsig.Pirsig avoided his own Mu > >>>> states! > >>>> > >>>> The trick is in the imaginary slow-motion of indiana jones his whip, > the > >>>> resonance rise in de wave is reflecting back to the hand that is on > the > >>>> end > >>>> of the whip,but the reflection moves up in amplitude depending on the > >>>> lenght of the whip and the induced amplitude in the first place. > >>>> > >>>> This kind of reasearch is what you should be performing Eddo,instead > of > >>>> pissing of Mr Buchanan. > >>>> > >>>> en Blijf weg van “opslingering”!--resonance rise, en de stilte van de > >>>> Mu. > >>>> > >>>> Study these things before you will become Mu only, there is enough to > >>>> grasp. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Groet , Adrie > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2013/4/6 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> > @dumb > >>>> > Typical you to pick this part being my soft spot as someone with a > >>>> > psychiatric hystory being honest about it. You are not a philosopher > >>>> but a > >>>> > moq philosophologist a politician and a narcistic priest that wants > >>>> me out > >>>> > of his church. Good luck with your church. You win! :D probably > >>>> dropped > >>>> > mathematics at highschool. This is that above the door > >>>> > Plato<http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Plato.html > > > >>>> > inscribed > >>>> > "Let no one who is not a geometer enter" > >>>> > > >>>> > My advice to you, read ZMM where pirsig goes to chicago again and > >>>> again and > >>>> > again and again. Look in the mirror and think very hard. To me > >>>> you're a > >>>> > lost case but never give up hope . > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > 2013/4/5 david buchanan <[email protected]> > >>>> > > >>>> > > Eddo answered the million dollar question: What's the point? > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > ...Understanding this relationship became even more important > during > >>>> > > psychotic episodes when i noticed that the amounts of sensation i > >>>> had to > >>>> > > deal with became so high that it had a distorting effect on the > >>>> > personality > >>>> > > i was (as a collection of concepts in my subconscious mind). This > >>>> made me > >>>> > > even work harder to be able to understand this relationship. Now > >>>> after > >>>> > > twenty years i thought of a way to understand this, and this gives > >>>> me > >>>> > tools > >>>> > > in my head to regulate myself when the sensations tend to become > to > >>>> high. > >>>> > > So "the point" to me has very personal value... > >>>> > > P.S. Lets continue this discussion in the new thread i made > "Quality > >>>> > > defined!" because we are hijacking this thread which was started > >>>> with > >>>> > > another purpose by somebody else. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > dmb says: > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Sorry, but I'm not interested. Since Pirsig says (about a thousand > >>>> times) > >>>> > > that Quality can't be defined and since your interested in mostly > >>>> > yourself, > >>>> > > I don't think you're even talking about the MOQ. That's the point > >>>> and > >>>> > > purpose of this forum and I'm not qualified to help you regulate > >>>> your > >>>> > > sensations anyway. > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > >>>> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >>>> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >>>> > > Archives: > >>>> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >>>> > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > >>>> > > > >>>> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > >>>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >>>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >>>> > Archives: > >>>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >>>> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> parser > >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list > >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >>>> Archives: > >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
