correction again; mu state: e^i(wt+pi/3) + e^-i(wt+pi/3) = coswt (when cos wt = cos -wt)
Just woke up this can't be right, the math in my head is graphical, that's why these errors. I am an Engineer, not a Mathematiciam :D 2013/4/7 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > correction; basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^-(iwt+pi/3) = > coswt (when cos wt = cos -wt) > > > 2013/4/8 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> > >> Hi Adrie >> Net terug van muziek sessie. Maak je geen zorgen over mijn opslingeringen. >> >> You're worries about my state of resonance rise gives me the idea that >> you seem to understand the direction i want to go to. I am taking some >> more time to write a propper answer to your mail. >> >> But for the time being i can tell you my findings of the mu state in the >> wave equation. >> >> The resonance rise situation is dangerous because you are than suceptable >> to energy absorbtion. I don't yet know what kind of Energy but it causes >> your sensation levels to rise above sustainable levels. >> >> Famous mechanical example of resonance rise too! high: tecoma bridge >> resonance rise! <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-zczJXSxnw> >> >> Like this bridge can distort and break a subconscious mind can >> distort(psychosis) and break(schizofrenia, dissosiation disorders) >> >> >> I believe i found the mu state in resonanance theory but have never been >> able to communicate it with anyone. >> >> basic resonance rise equation: e^iwt + e^-iwt = 2coswt >> >> basic resonance mu state: e^(iwt+pi/3) + e^(-iwt+pi/3) = coswt (when >> cos wt = cos -wt) >> >> >> Have fun! >> >> met vriendelijke groeten Eddo Rats >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ** >> >> >> 2013/4/6 ADRIE KINTZIGER <[email protected]> >> >>> Eddo, read learrn and chill-out a bit. >>> >>> Mu state . Zen and the art.......someone quoting Roberts observations on >>> wiki. >>> >>> *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)*< >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)> >>> >>> Good but no good article. >>> >>> Under “unasking the question” there is a snippet from Zen where Robert >>> makes a numer of big mistakes.The entire thinkingline of Robert about >>> circuits and on/off caracteristics is wrong. >>> >>> Computercircuits are never in a Mu-state.Only on first sight they seem to >>> be awaiting for zero power or power on as in on/off.What Robert is >>> depicting is a normal light circuit,a bulb, power on or of light on or >>> off >>> , zero or not zero. >>> >>> Integrated computer circuits have three different states, and zero or non >>> zero is not one of them. >>> >>> High impendance (!) >>> >>> Under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_impedance >>> >>> You will be able to find digital electronics and analogue electronics. >>> >>> Now it is very easy to find where Robert goes wrong ,In digital >>> electronics >>> and computer circuits there are three different states, and they are not >>> Mu. >>> >>> Robert tought that analogue electronics have the same properties of the >>> digital ones >>> >>> Not being an electronic engineer,Robert will always miss the word he was >>> looking for >>> >>> to make his entire point of view correct....”resonance rise” this was the >>> term he missed. >>> >>> and to understand this >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance_(alternating-current_circuits) >>> >>> Now my point for you Eddo >>> >>> You are taking the term “resonance rise” out of the technical connotation >>> and understand it as “Opslingering”but this connotation makes me realise >>> where you want to point out with your wave equations, you are trying to >>> avoid your own mu states, >>> >>> but fail to find the words, like Pirsig.Pirsig avoided his own Mu states! >>> >>> The trick is in the imaginary slow-motion of indiana jones his whip, the >>> resonance rise in de wave is reflecting back to the hand that is on the >>> end >>> of the whip,but the reflection moves up in amplitude depending on the >>> lenght of the whip and the induced amplitude in the first place. >>> >>> This kind of reasearch is what you should be performing Eddo,instead of >>> pissing of Mr Buchanan. >>> >>> en Blijf weg van “opslingering”!--resonance rise, en de stilte van de Mu. >>> >>> Study these things before you will become Mu only, there is enough to >>> grasp. >>> >>> >>> >>> Groet , Adrie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2013/4/6 Eddo Rats <[email protected]> >>> >>> > @dumb >>> > Typical you to pick this part being my soft spot as someone with a >>> > psychiatric hystory being honest about it. You are not a philosopher >>> but a >>> > moq philosophologist a politician and a narcistic priest that wants me >>> out >>> > of his church. Good luck with your church. You win! :D probably >>> dropped >>> > mathematics at highschool. This is that above the door >>> > Plato<http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Plato.html> >>> > inscribed >>> > "Let no one who is not a geometer enter" >>> > >>> > My advice to you, read ZMM where pirsig goes to chicago again and >>> again and >>> > again and again. Look in the mirror and think very hard. To me >>> you're a >>> > lost case but never give up hope . >>> > >>> > >>> > 2013/4/5 david buchanan <[email protected]> >>> > >>> > > Eddo answered the million dollar question: What's the point? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ...Understanding this relationship became even more important during >>> > > psychotic episodes when i noticed that the amounts of sensation i >>> had to >>> > > deal with became so high that it had a distorting effect on the >>> > personality >>> > > i was (as a collection of concepts in my subconscious mind). This >>> made me >>> > > even work harder to be able to understand this relationship. Now >>> after >>> > > twenty years i thought of a way to understand this, and this gives me >>> > tools >>> > > in my head to regulate myself when the sensations tend to become to >>> high. >>> > > So "the point" to me has very personal value... >>> > > P.S. Lets continue this discussion in the new thread i made "Quality >>> > > defined!" because we are hijacking this thread which was started with >>> > > another purpose by somebody else. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > dmb says: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Sorry, but I'm not interested. Since Pirsig says (about a thousand >>> times) >>> > > that Quality can't be defined and since your interested in mostly >>> > yourself, >>> > > I don't think you're even talking about the MOQ. That's the point and >>> > > purpose of this forum and I'm not qualified to help you regulate your >>> > > sensations anyway. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> > > Archives: >>> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> > > >>> > Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> > Archives: >>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> parser >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> >> >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
