[Ian] Ian adds, would anyone like to continue, or join that up with the topics of intellectual coherence as intellectual patterns - with or without working definitions of coherence and intellect, which as Arlo already noted may be ultimately unavoidable for some patterns?
[Arlo] As I mentioned off-line, but will restate here. 'Coherence' has nothing to do with 'undefined' or 'indefinable'. That DQ is not defined in the MOQ is not a sign of 'incoherence'. That it requires 'poetics' to get at it is not a sign of 'incoherence'. All you doing with this is reducing 'coherence' to 'objectivist/scientistic/SOMist', which is the SOURCE OF YOUR ERROR in the first place. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
