John to Andre:
The essence of the Giant is SOM and if you can't see that then I don't
even know what you're doing here.
Andre:
Since you say you have a good grasp of the MoQ John let me ask you: do
you agree that 'the Giant' is a social pov? And do you agree that SOM is
an intellectual pov? And lastly, do you agree that there is a difference
between social pov's and intellectual pov's?
If you say yes to all three questions, which you should, 'cos you know
the MoQ so well, then how can you maintain that 'the essence'(Hamilton's
spirit?)of the Giant (a social pov) is SOM (an intellectual pov)?
John:
SOM says values are subjective. SOM says subjects are real. Therefore,
SOM must say that values are real and you are contradicting yourself.
Andre:
Sorry John but the SOM asserts that values are unreal.
John:
I don't expect to get bombarded by charges of "you just don't get the
MOQ" all the time simply because my questions and searchings go beyond
the normal orthodoxy of interpretation, prevalent amongst MDer's and
most particularly you and dmb. Fair enough?
Andre:
This is fair enough John but I have yet to find an UNorthodox
interpretation of yours that trumps an MoQ interpretation. Thus far I
have seen only confusion and a lot of twitter.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
