I agree with Nick in that I have at lease 6 Muxed clocks that have been 
running for years on end without incident. And I  have 2 of Jeff’s/Pete 
Hands FLW clocks that have been running for years as well. BUT, the fact 
remains a direct drive clock will produce a brighter tube. So, if thats a 
concern, a direct drive design might be preferable. AND if you have 6) 
7971’s looking for a home, we still have Lumina Kits available! You will 
need to build you own case. 
http://www.badnixie.com/Badnixie.com_Welcome.html
On Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 10:17:38 AM UTC-7 Nicholas Stock wrote:

> Understood. However (and this has been a discussion many many times on 
> this forum), I think multiplexing gets too much hate. I've had multiplexed 
> (IN14) clocks that are still going strong over 10 years now with no 
> noticeable deterioration in the tube, so my opinion differs from some, in 
> fact you will find specific multiplexing details in some nixie tube 
> datasheets (Burroughs wrote an application note on just this topic - 
> https://neonkev.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/n101.pdf). I understand 
> all the comments about increased current for similar brightness etc and how 
> that *may* impact tube life, especially when dealing with tubes that are 
> becoming rarer and rarer, but it may be a bit overly cautious?
>
> ... bracing for the can of worms this may unleash on the forum.... :)
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:59 AM Chachi88 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Nick,
>>
>> This design uses a multiplex scheme, which as discussed is considered 
>> undesirable as it impacts tube life.  I have seen this design but am 
>> looking for a direct drive alternative.  I am seeing that there is a 
>> "smartsocket" that supports this tube...interesting.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Monday, September 23, 2024 at 3:42:55 PM UTC-4 Nicholas Stock wrote:
>>
>>> https://www.thomasnixie.com/the-gps-flw-nixie-clock
>>>
>>> Still available without tubes etc if you're interested...
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:31 PM Chachi88 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think I have enough tubes to do 3 6-tube clocks.  I am also 
>>>> noticing that all the FLW circuits and boards I am finding seem to be 
>>>> multiplex drive, which is undesirable from what we have discussed...but I 
>>>> would love to be proven wrong.  If not, there might be an opportunity 
>>>> here...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again y'all.
>>>> On Monday, September 23, 2024 at 12:10:01 PM UTC-4 MichaelB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I do. Still 5 or so in stock. Thanks Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, September 23, 2024 at 8:26:10 AM UTC-7 Nicholas Stock wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's always the MOD_6 in case you're not familiar with it... I 
>>>>>> believe Michael may have some left?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://badnixie.com/Badnixie.com_Welcome.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Michael Barile ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:05 AM Chachi88 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Richard,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks I will PM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gregebert,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Funny you should mention the B7971, in this lot with the NL8091s I 
>>>>>>> also received an armload of these tubes (they actually have the same 
>>>>>>> socket), funnily enough...  You wouldn't happen to have a FLW clock 
>>>>>>> design 
>>>>>>> using your circuitry available? That will be next on my hit-list and I 
>>>>>>> will 
>>>>>>> need kits to make 3 clocks (one will be a gift to the person who gave 
>>>>>>> me 
>>>>>>> all these tubes).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your help, folks.
>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 19, 2024 at 2:32:49 AM UTC-4 Richard Scales 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think I have some info at nixology.uk under the PRISM-18 project 
>>>>>>>> page.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Full NTP Sync (clock needs wifi), web gui, pir activation, 
>>>>>>>> etc/etc/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PM me for any more info.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  - Richard
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday 18 September 2024 at 21:33:00 UTC+1 Chachi88 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First off, thank you guys very much for your input here, I will 
>>>>>>>>> address them most recent to oldest.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peter,
>>>>>>>>> I apologize I cannot view this link I do not use facebook.  I also 
>>>>>>>>> cannot find a link to Richard Scales B-8091 clock PCB that you 
>>>>>>>>> mention.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nicholas Stock,
>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for showing me this website, I had come across it 
>>>>>>>>> also, but was discouraged by the "sold out" notification for this 
>>>>>>>>> board.  
>>>>>>>>> Is there any way I can message the seller, you think?  I really like 
>>>>>>>>> all 
>>>>>>>>> the features this board has already implemented for me...but maybe 
>>>>>>>>> greg's 
>>>>>>>>> first comment is calling my name...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> gregebert,
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the very informative points, I have addressed my 
>>>>>>>>> responses and followup questions individually below in *Italics.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #1. I dont like sockets because they put stress on the tube pins. 
>>>>>>>>> Some of them grip the pins very hard and it's difficult to insert or 
>>>>>>>>> remove 
>>>>>>>>> the tubes, which adds to the risk of bending or breaking the pins or 
>>>>>>>>> putting stress on the glass. Instead, I use socket pins soldered into 
>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>> PCB, and the force to insert/remove tubes is very low.
>>>>>>>>> *Point taken, I will look at my sockets carefully before 
>>>>>>>>> considering using them.  Otherwise I will probably borrow your idea, 
>>>>>>>>> cheers.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #2. Direct drive. There's no need to multiplex individual tubes, 
>>>>>>>>> and there's no cost benefit when tubes are worth hundreds of dollars 
>>>>>>>>> apiece 
>>>>>>>>> and the drive electronics is at most a few dollars. Multiplexing 
>>>>>>>>> requires 
>>>>>>>>> higher current, and that degrades the tube's lifetime.
>>>>>>>>> *This is what I have understood as well, thanks for confirming.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #3. Use a current regulator, and set the current at the 
>>>>>>>>> recommended spec value; too high and you wear-out the tube. Too low 
>>>>>>>>> and you 
>>>>>>>>> risk cathode poisoning. A single anode resistor per-tube is OK, but 
>>>>>>>>> as the 
>>>>>>>>> anode voltage varies, so does the current (no such problem with a 
>>>>>>>>> current 
>>>>>>>>> regulator, though). You can mitigate this by using a higher anode 
>>>>>>>>> supply 
>>>>>>>>> voltage and larger anode resistor, at the expense of more wasted 
>>>>>>>>> energy. As 
>>>>>>>>> tubes age, their striking voltage may increase, so having a higher 
>>>>>>>>> anode 
>>>>>>>>> voltage will help mitigate this.
>>>>>>>>> *Understood, is this implemented a current regulator per tube or 
>>>>>>>>> is this a single current regulator?  If single current regulator, how 
>>>>>>>>> do 
>>>>>>>>> you account for possibly having varying current with different digit 
>>>>>>>>> activation? or am I missing an operating principle here?*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #4. PIR sensor. Turn off the tubes if nobody is there to watch 
>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>> *This will definitely be part of the overall clock design (also 
>>>>>>>>> incorporating a Noritake Itron 20 character 5x7 VFD).  I plan on 
>>>>>>>>> having a 
>>>>>>>>> smoked plexiglass case housing the electronics and VFD while mounting 
>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>> nixie tubes on top. Which leads on to our next point...*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #5. Protect the tubes inside a case, and make sure there is enough 
>>>>>>>>> ventilation so the heat doesn't build-up inside. On my later designs 
>>>>>>>>> I have 
>>>>>>>>> a thermal sensor (sometimes several) so that software can monitor 
>>>>>>>>> critical 
>>>>>>>>> temperatures and shutdown if things get too warm.
>>>>>>>>> *If the tubes are always going to be high up in the air (on a 
>>>>>>>>> dedicated wall shelf), is casing them necessary? Could not casing 
>>>>>>>>> them 
>>>>>>>>> cause convection heat to rise around them and risk stressing the 
>>>>>>>>> glass?  
>>>>>>>>> The thermal sensor is a good idea, for the inside of my case I will 
>>>>>>>>> certainly implement this, probably in multiple spots as you 
>>>>>>>>> suggested.  Do 
>>>>>>>>> people ever put thermocouples on the tubes themselves to monitor heat 
>>>>>>>>> or 
>>>>>>>>> could you see value in it?  I might consider that in my design.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #6. Depoisoning routine to exercise all cathodes.
>>>>>>>>> *This is not the first time I have read of depoisoning (a common 
>>>>>>>>> feature on most bonafide driver boards I have seen). I have also seen 
>>>>>>>>> there 
>>>>>>>>> are different marketed techniques for depoisoning: slot machine, 
>>>>>>>>> strobe, 
>>>>>>>>> etc...*
>>>>>>>>> *What are the principles behind cathode poisoning and the theory 
>>>>>>>>> of prevention? If this has already been documented somewhere please 
>>>>>>>>> give me 
>>>>>>>>> strength on my journey you send me on.*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #7. Backlighting (or base lighting). I havn't done this on any of 
>>>>>>>>> my clocks, and I've never had problems with tubes not firing-up. 
>>>>>>>>> Others 
>>>>>>>>> have reported problems without backlighting. It can have aesthetic 
>>>>>>>>> value, 
>>>>>>>>> though I'm not fond of it.
>>>>>>>>> *I tend to agree with you, for me, this was considered 
>>>>>>>>> aesthetically not necessary, but if there is value in ensuring 
>>>>>>>>> operation, I 
>>>>>>>>> will plan on incorporating this in the design even if it is left 
>>>>>>>>> partially 
>>>>>>>>> implemented in hardware or neglected in software...*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That should cover the necessities for the tubes; there are always 
>>>>>>>>> lots of other features that can be done, especially if the clock has 
>>>>>>>>> open-source software (or you develop it on your own).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Thank you again sincerely for expounding this much on this, I in 
>>>>>>>>> the end, I am hoping to find a clock/driver board with open source 
>>>>>>>>> software 
>>>>>>>>> or just raw signal input pins exposed that way I can incorporate it 
>>>>>>>>> in with 
>>>>>>>>> my VFD with minimal additional effort expounded on the nixie driver 
>>>>>>>>> block 
>>>>>>>>> (because it has already been done probably way better than I would do 
>>>>>>>>> it on 
>>>>>>>>> a first pass).  I can then address it, animate it, etc. with a 
>>>>>>>>> microcontroller of my own...*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 11:05:11 AM UTC-4 Nicholas 
>>>>>>>>> Stock wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pete also has a remote driver system that will work with 
>>>>>>>>>> B8091s... 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.pvelectronics.co.uk/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=43
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024, at 07:16, Peter Doroba <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is the clock I made using Richard Scales B-8091 clock PCB.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/142414439207058/search/?q=b-8091
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 12:41:14 AM UTC-4 gregebert 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Those are very valuable tubes, so if you are willing to design 
>>>>>>>>>>> your own driver and the PC board, I would do that. I've made 
>>>>>>>>>>> several clocks 
>>>>>>>>>>> and never had a design problem that affected the tubes. Even if you 
>>>>>>>>>>> find a 
>>>>>>>>>>> board to purchase, see if any of the following apply:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Some of my suggestions:
>>>>>>>>>>> #1. I dont like sockets because they put stress on the tube 
>>>>>>>>>>> pins. Some of them grip the pins very hard and it's difficult to 
>>>>>>>>>>> insert or 
>>>>>>>>>>> remove the tubes, which adds to the risk of bending or breaking the 
>>>>>>>>>>> pins or 
>>>>>>>>>>> putting stress on the glass. Instead, I use socket pins soldered 
>>>>>>>>>>> into the 
>>>>>>>>>>> PCB, and the force to insert/remove tubes is very low.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #2. Direct drive. There's no need to multiplex individual tubes, 
>>>>>>>>>>> and there's no cost benefit when tubes are worth hundreds of 
>>>>>>>>>>> dollars apiece 
>>>>>>>>>>> and the drive electronics is at most a few dollars. Multiplexing 
>>>>>>>>>>> requires 
>>>>>>>>>>> higher current, and that degrades the tube's lifetime.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #3. Use a current regulator, and set the current at the 
>>>>>>>>>>> recommended spec value; too high and you wear-out the tube. Too low 
>>>>>>>>>>> and you 
>>>>>>>>>>> risk cathode poisoning. A single anode resistor per-tube is OK, but 
>>>>>>>>>>> as the 
>>>>>>>>>>> anode voltage varies, so does the current (no such problem with a 
>>>>>>>>>>> current 
>>>>>>>>>>> regulator, though). You can mitigate this by using a higher anode 
>>>>>>>>>>> supply 
>>>>>>>>>>> voltage and larger anode resistor, at the expense of more wasted 
>>>>>>>>>>> energy. As 
>>>>>>>>>>> tubes age, their striking voltage may increase, so having a higher 
>>>>>>>>>>> anode 
>>>>>>>>>>> voltage will help mitigate this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #4. PIR sensor. Turn off the tubes if nobody is there to watch 
>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #5. Protect the tubes inside a case, and make sure there is 
>>>>>>>>>>> enough ventilation so the heat doesn't build-up inside. On my later 
>>>>>>>>>>> designs 
>>>>>>>>>>> I have a thermal sensor (sometimes several) so that software can 
>>>>>>>>>>> monitor 
>>>>>>>>>>> critical temperatures and shutdown if things get too warm.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #6. Depoisoning routine to exercise all cathodes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> #7. Backlighting (or base lighting). I havn't done this on any 
>>>>>>>>>>> of my clocks, and I've never had problems with tubes not firing-up. 
>>>>>>>>>>> Others 
>>>>>>>>>>> have reported problems without backlighting. It can have aesthetic 
>>>>>>>>>>> value, 
>>>>>>>>>>> though I'm not fond of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That should cover the necessities for the tubes; there are 
>>>>>>>>>>> always lots of other features that can be done, especially if the 
>>>>>>>>>>> clock has 
>>>>>>>>>>> open-source software (or you develop it on your own).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 17, 2024 at 8:17:28 PM UTC-7 Chachi88 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am climbing stairs from the foot of the mountain to sit at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the feet of all you nixie gurus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What is the current state of the art for remote driver boards?  
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am aware some of the older drivers are not as reliable or can 
>>>>>>>>>>>> cause the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> tubes to degrade quicker.  Some of the new options I am seeing 
>>>>>>>>>>>> have 
>>>>>>>>>>>> "cathode poisoning prevention"  I have recently come upon qty 6 of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> NL8091's and their original sockets and socket mounting plate, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> which I wish 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to reuse for a clock. Are there any off the shelf boards even 
>>>>>>>>>>>> capable of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> driving this tube?  I was looking at a board on ebay that comes 
>>>>>>>>>>>> with an IR 
>>>>>>>>>>>> remote but it seems too good to be true, I would be willing to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> spend 5 
>>>>>>>>>>>> times as much for a board that was properly documented and put 
>>>>>>>>>>>> together and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> had some sort of pedigree...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for any advice or direction you can give.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bac36066-03e6-4a6e-a83a-69020b75572fn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bac36066-03e6-4a6e-a83a-69020b75572fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/24034a0a-3836-4449-9693-1eb861b77570n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/24034a0a-3836-4449-9693-1eb861b77570n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/6c53bfce-70bc-406b-8b68-04bb086d14a8n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/6c53bfce-70bc-406b-8b68-04bb086d14a8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/89307466-2c08-483e-8cfb-73abd5dc7b35n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/89307466-2c08-483e-8cfb-73abd5dc7b35n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/107c0a87-4aa3-49e4-9bca-db4c14c66e36n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to