Nick,

This design uses a multiplex scheme, which as discussed is considered 
undesirable as it impacts tube life.  I have seen this design but am 
looking for a direct drive alternative.  I am seeing that there is a 
"smartsocket" that supports this tube...interesting.

Thanks

On Monday, September 23, 2024 at 3:42:55 PM UTC-4 Nicholas Stock wrote:

> https://www.thomasnixie.com/the-gps-flw-nixie-clock
>
> Still available without tubes etc if you're interested...
>
> Nick
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:31 PM Chachi88 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think I have enough tubes to do 3 6-tube clocks.  I am also 
>> noticing that all the FLW circuits and boards I am finding seem to be 
>> multiplex drive, which is undesirable from what we have discussed...but I 
>> would love to be proven wrong.  If not, there might be an opportunity 
>> here...
>>
>> Thanks again y'all.
>> On Monday, September 23, 2024 at 12:10:01 PM UTC-4 MichaelB wrote:
>>
>>> I do. Still 5 or so in stock. Thanks Nick
>>>
>>> On Monday, September 23, 2024 at 8:26:10 AM UTC-7 Nicholas Stock wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's always the MOD_6 in case you're not familiar with it... I 
>>>> believe Michael may have some left?
>>>>
>>>> http://badnixie.com/Badnixie.com_Welcome.html
>>>>
>>>> @Michael Barile ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:05 AM Chachi88 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Richard,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks I will PM
>>>>>
>>>>> gregebert,
>>>>>
>>>>> Funny you should mention the B7971, in this lot with the NL8091s I 
>>>>> also received an armload of these tubes (they actually have the same 
>>>>> socket), funnily enough...  You wouldn't happen to have a FLW clock 
>>>>> design 
>>>>> using your circuitry available? That will be next on my hit-list and I 
>>>>> will 
>>>>> need kits to make 3 clocks (one will be a gift to the person who gave me 
>>>>> all these tubes).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks so much for your help, folks.
>>>>> On Thursday, September 19, 2024 at 2:32:49 AM UTC-4 Richard Scales 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I have some info at nixology.uk under the PRISM-18 project 
>>>>>> page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Full NTP Sync (clock needs wifi), web gui, pir activation, 
>>>>>> etc/etc/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PM me for any more info.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday 18 September 2024 at 21:33:00 UTC+1 Chachi88 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First off, thank you guys very much for your input here, I will 
>>>>>>> address them most recent to oldest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter,
>>>>>>> I apologize I cannot view this link I do not use facebook.  I also 
>>>>>>> cannot find a link to Richard Scales B-8091 clock PCB that you mention.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nicholas Stock,
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for showing me this website, I had come across it also, 
>>>>>>> but was discouraged by the "sold out" notification for this board.  Is 
>>>>>>> there any way I can message the seller, you think?  I really like all 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> features this board has already implemented for me...but maybe greg's 
>>>>>>> first 
>>>>>>> comment is calling my name...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gregebert,
>>>>>>> Thanks for the very informative points, I have addressed my 
>>>>>>> responses and followup questions individually below in *Italics.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #1. I dont like sockets because they put stress on the tube pins. 
>>>>>>> Some of them grip the pins very hard and it's difficult to insert or 
>>>>>>> remove 
>>>>>>> the tubes, which adds to the risk of bending or breaking the pins or 
>>>>>>> putting stress on the glass. Instead, I use socket pins soldered into 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> PCB, and the force to insert/remove tubes is very low.
>>>>>>> *Point taken, I will look at my sockets carefully before considering 
>>>>>>> using them.  Otherwise I will probably borrow your idea, cheers.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #2. Direct drive. There's no need to multiplex individual tubes, and 
>>>>>>> there's no cost benefit when tubes are worth hundreds of dollars apiece 
>>>>>>> and 
>>>>>>> the drive electronics is at most a few dollars. Multiplexing requires 
>>>>>>> higher current, and that degrades the tube's lifetime.
>>>>>>> *This is what I have understood as well, thanks for confirming.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #3. Use a current regulator, and set the current at the recommended 
>>>>>>> spec value; too high and you wear-out the tube. Too low and you risk 
>>>>>>> cathode poisoning. A single anode resistor per-tube is OK, but as the 
>>>>>>> anode 
>>>>>>> voltage varies, so does the current (no such problem with a current 
>>>>>>> regulator, though). You can mitigate this by using a higher anode 
>>>>>>> supply 
>>>>>>> voltage and larger anode resistor, at the expense of more wasted 
>>>>>>> energy. As 
>>>>>>> tubes age, their striking voltage may increase, so having a higher 
>>>>>>> anode 
>>>>>>> voltage will help mitigate this.
>>>>>>> *Understood, is this implemented a current regulator per tube or is 
>>>>>>> this a single current regulator?  If single current regulator, how do 
>>>>>>> you 
>>>>>>> account for possibly having varying current with different digit 
>>>>>>> activation? or am I missing an operating principle here?*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #4. PIR sensor. Turn off the tubes if nobody is there to watch them.
>>>>>>> *This will definitely be part of the overall clock design (also 
>>>>>>> incorporating a Noritake Itron 20 character 5x7 VFD).  I plan on having 
>>>>>>> a 
>>>>>>> smoked plexiglass case housing the electronics and VFD while mounting 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> nixie tubes on top. Which leads on to our next point...*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #5. Protect the tubes inside a case, and make sure there is enough 
>>>>>>> ventilation so the heat doesn't build-up inside. On my later designs I 
>>>>>>> have 
>>>>>>> a thermal sensor (sometimes several) so that software can monitor 
>>>>>>> critical 
>>>>>>> temperatures and shutdown if things get too warm.
>>>>>>> *If the tubes are always going to be high up in the air (on a 
>>>>>>> dedicated wall shelf), is casing them necessary? Could not casing them 
>>>>>>> cause convection heat to rise around them and risk stressing the glass? 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> The thermal sensor is a good idea, for the inside of my case I will 
>>>>>>> certainly implement this, probably in multiple spots as you suggested.  
>>>>>>> Do 
>>>>>>> people ever put thermocouples on the tubes themselves to monitor heat 
>>>>>>> or 
>>>>>>> could you see value in it?  I might consider that in my design.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #6. Depoisoning routine to exercise all cathodes.
>>>>>>> *This is not the first time I have read of depoisoning (a common 
>>>>>>> feature on most bonafide driver boards I have seen). I have also seen 
>>>>>>> there 
>>>>>>> are different marketed techniques for depoisoning: slot machine, 
>>>>>>> strobe, 
>>>>>>> etc...*
>>>>>>> *What are the principles behind cathode poisoning and the theory of 
>>>>>>> prevention? If this has already been documented somewhere please give 
>>>>>>> me 
>>>>>>> strength on my journey you send me on.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #7. Backlighting (or base lighting). I havn't done this on any of my 
>>>>>>> clocks, and I've never had problems with tubes not firing-up. Others 
>>>>>>> have 
>>>>>>> reported problems without backlighting. It can have aesthetic value, 
>>>>>>> though 
>>>>>>> I'm not fond of it.
>>>>>>> *I tend to agree with you, for me, this was considered aesthetically 
>>>>>>> not necessary, but if there is value in ensuring operation, I will plan 
>>>>>>> on 
>>>>>>> incorporating this in the design even if it is left partially 
>>>>>>> implemented 
>>>>>>> in hardware or neglected in software...*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That should cover the necessities for the tubes; there are always 
>>>>>>> lots of other features that can be done, especially if the clock has 
>>>>>>> open-source software (or you develop it on your own).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Thank you again sincerely for expounding this much on this, I in 
>>>>>>> the end, I am hoping to find a clock/driver board with open source 
>>>>>>> software 
>>>>>>> or just raw signal input pins exposed that way I can incorporate it in 
>>>>>>> with 
>>>>>>> my VFD with minimal additional effort expounded on the nixie driver 
>>>>>>> block 
>>>>>>> (because it has already been done probably way better than I would do 
>>>>>>> it on 
>>>>>>> a first pass).  I can then address it, animate it, etc. with a 
>>>>>>> microcontroller of my own...*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 11:05:11 AM UTC-4 Nicholas Stock 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pete also has a remote driver system that will work with B8091s... 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.pvelectronics.co.uk/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=43
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2024, at 07:16, Peter Doroba <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is the clock I made using Richard Scales B-8091 clock PCB.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/142414439207058/search/?q=b-8091
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 12:41:14 AM UTC-4 gregebert 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Those are very valuable tubes, so if you are willing to design 
>>>>>>>>> your own driver and the PC board, I would do that. I've made several 
>>>>>>>>> clocks 
>>>>>>>>> and never had a design problem that affected the tubes. Even if you 
>>>>>>>>> find a 
>>>>>>>>> board to purchase, see if any of the following apply:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some of my suggestions:
>>>>>>>>> #1. I dont like sockets because they put stress on the tube pins. 
>>>>>>>>> Some of them grip the pins very hard and it's difficult to insert or 
>>>>>>>>> remove 
>>>>>>>>> the tubes, which adds to the risk of bending or breaking the pins or 
>>>>>>>>> putting stress on the glass. Instead, I use socket pins soldered into 
>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>> PCB, and the force to insert/remove tubes is very low.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #2. Direct drive. There's no need to multiplex individual tubes, 
>>>>>>>>> and there's no cost benefit when tubes are worth hundreds of dollars 
>>>>>>>>> apiece 
>>>>>>>>> and the drive electronics is at most a few dollars. Multiplexing 
>>>>>>>>> requires 
>>>>>>>>> higher current, and that degrades the tube's lifetime.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #3. Use a current regulator, and set the current at the 
>>>>>>>>> recommended spec value; too high and you wear-out the tube. Too low 
>>>>>>>>> and you 
>>>>>>>>> risk cathode poisoning. A single anode resistor per-tube is OK, but 
>>>>>>>>> as the 
>>>>>>>>> anode voltage varies, so does the current (no such problem with a 
>>>>>>>>> current 
>>>>>>>>> regulator, though). You can mitigate this by using a higher anode 
>>>>>>>>> supply 
>>>>>>>>> voltage and larger anode resistor, at the expense of more wasted 
>>>>>>>>> energy. As 
>>>>>>>>> tubes age, their striking voltage may increase, so having a higher 
>>>>>>>>> anode 
>>>>>>>>> voltage will help mitigate this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #4. PIR sensor. Turn off the tubes if nobody is there to watch 
>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #5. Protect the tubes inside a case, and make sure there is enough 
>>>>>>>>> ventilation so the heat doesn't build-up inside. On my later designs 
>>>>>>>>> I have 
>>>>>>>>> a thermal sensor (sometimes several) so that software can monitor 
>>>>>>>>> critical 
>>>>>>>>> temperatures and shutdown if things get too warm.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #6. Depoisoning routine to exercise all cathodes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #7. Backlighting (or base lighting). I havn't done this on any of 
>>>>>>>>> my clocks, and I've never had problems with tubes not firing-up. 
>>>>>>>>> Others 
>>>>>>>>> have reported problems without backlighting. It can have aesthetic 
>>>>>>>>> value, 
>>>>>>>>> though I'm not fond of it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That should cover the necessities for the tubes; there are always 
>>>>>>>>> lots of other features that can be done, especially if the clock has 
>>>>>>>>> open-source software (or you develop it on your own).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 17, 2024 at 8:17:28 PM UTC-7 Chachi88 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am climbing stairs from the foot of the mountain to sit at the 
>>>>>>>>>> feet of all you nixie gurus.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What is the current state of the art for remote driver boards?  I 
>>>>>>>>>> am aware some of the older drivers are not as reliable or can cause 
>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>> tubes to degrade quicker.  Some of the new options I am seeing have 
>>>>>>>>>> "cathode poisoning prevention"  I have recently come upon qty 6 of 
>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>> NL8091's and their original sockets and socket mounting plate, which 
>>>>>>>>>> I wish 
>>>>>>>>>> to reuse for a clock. Are there any off the shelf boards even 
>>>>>>>>>> capable of 
>>>>>>>>>> driving this tube?  I was looking at a board on ebay that comes with 
>>>>>>>>>> an IR 
>>>>>>>>>> remote but it seems too good to be true, I would be willing to spend 
>>>>>>>>>> 5 
>>>>>>>>>> times as much for a board that was properly documented and put 
>>>>>>>>>> together and 
>>>>>>>>>> had some sort of pedigree...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for any advice or direction you can give.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bac36066-03e6-4a6e-a83a-69020b75572fn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bac36066-03e6-4a6e-a83a-69020b75572fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/24034a0a-3836-4449-9693-1eb861b77570n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/24034a0a-3836-4449-9693-1eb861b77570n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/6c53bfce-70bc-406b-8b68-04bb086d14a8n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/6c53bfce-70bc-406b-8b68-04bb086d14a8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/89307466-2c08-483e-8cfb-73abd5dc7b35n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to