I think I have some info at nixology.uk under the PRISM-18 project page.

Full NTP Sync (clock needs wifi), web gui, pir activation, 
etc/etc/

PM me for any more info.


 - Richard

On Wednesday 18 September 2024 at 21:33:00 UTC+1 Chachi88 wrote:

> First off, thank you guys very much for your input here, I will address 
> them most recent to oldest.
>
> Peter,
> I apologize I cannot view this link I do not use facebook.  I also cannot 
> find a link to Richard Scales B-8091 clock PCB that you mention.
>
> Nicholas Stock,
> Thanks a lot for showing me this website, I had come across it also, but 
> was discouraged by the "sold out" notification for this board.  Is there 
> any way I can message the seller, you think?  I really like all the 
> features this board has already implemented for me...but maybe greg's first 
> comment is calling my name...
>
> gregebert,
> Thanks for the very informative points, I have addressed my responses and 
> followup questions individually below in *Italics.*
>
> #1. I dont like sockets because they put stress on the tube pins. Some of 
> them grip the pins very hard and it's difficult to insert or remove the 
> tubes, which adds to the risk of bending or breaking the pins or putting 
> stress on the glass. Instead, I use socket pins soldered into the PCB, and 
> the force to insert/remove tubes is very low.
> *Point taken, I will look at my sockets carefully before considering using 
> them.  Otherwise I will probably borrow your idea, cheers.*
>
> #2. Direct drive. There's no need to multiplex individual tubes, and 
> there's no cost benefit when tubes are worth hundreds of dollars apiece and 
> the drive electronics is at most a few dollars. Multiplexing requires 
> higher current, and that degrades the tube's lifetime.
> *This is what I have understood as well, thanks for confirming.*
>
> #3. Use a current regulator, and set the current at the recommended spec 
> value; too high and you wear-out the tube. Too low and you risk cathode 
> poisoning. A single anode resistor per-tube is OK, but as the anode voltage 
> varies, so does the current (no such problem with a current regulator, 
> though). You can mitigate this by using a higher anode supply voltage and 
> larger anode resistor, at the expense of more wasted energy. As tubes age, 
> their striking voltage may increase, so having a higher anode voltage will 
> help mitigate this.
> *Understood, is this implemented a current regulator per tube or is this a 
> single current regulator?  If single current regulator, how do you account 
> for possibly having varying current with different digit activation? or am 
> I missing an operating principle here?*
>
> #4. PIR sensor. Turn off the tubes if nobody is there to watch them.
> *This will definitely be part of the overall clock design (also 
> incorporating a Noritake Itron 20 character 5x7 VFD).  I plan on having a 
> smoked plexiglass case housing the electronics and VFD while mounting the 
> nixie tubes on top. Which leads on to our next point...*
>
> #5. Protect the tubes inside a case, and make sure there is enough 
> ventilation so the heat doesn't build-up inside. On my later designs I have 
> a thermal sensor (sometimes several) so that software can monitor critical 
> temperatures and shutdown if things get too warm.
> *If the tubes are always going to be high up in the air (on a dedicated 
> wall shelf), is casing them necessary? Could not casing them cause 
> convection heat to rise around them and risk stressing the glass?  The 
> thermal sensor is a good idea, for the inside of my case I will certainly 
> implement this, probably in multiple spots as you suggested.  Do people 
> ever put thermocouples on the tubes themselves to monitor heat or could you 
> see value in it?  I might consider that in my design.*
>
> #6. Depoisoning routine to exercise all cathodes.
> *This is not the first time I have read of depoisoning (a common feature 
> on most bonafide driver boards I have seen). I have also seen there are 
> different marketed techniques for depoisoning: slot machine, strobe, etc...*
> *What are the principles behind cathode poisoning and the theory of 
> prevention? If this has already been documented somewhere please give me 
> strength on my journey you send me on.*
>
> #7. Backlighting (or base lighting). I havn't done this on any of my 
> clocks, and I've never had problems with tubes not firing-up. Others have 
> reported problems without backlighting. It can have aesthetic value, though 
> I'm not fond of it.
> *I tend to agree with you, for me, this was considered aesthetically not 
> necessary, but if there is value in ensuring operation, I will plan on 
> incorporating this in the design even if it is left partially implemented 
> in hardware or neglected in software...*
>
> That should cover the necessities for the tubes; there are always lots of 
> other features that can be done, especially if the clock has open-source 
> software (or you develop it on your own).
>
> *Thank you again sincerely for expounding this much on this, I in the end, 
> I am hoping to find a clock/driver board with open source software or just 
> raw signal input pins exposed that way I can incorporate it in with my VFD 
> with minimal additional effort expounded on the nixie driver block (because 
> it has already been done probably way better than I would do it on a first 
> pass).  I can then address it, animate it, etc. with a microcontroller of 
> my own...*
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 11:05:11 AM UTC-4 Nicholas Stock wrote:
>
>> Pete also has a remote driver system that will work with B8091s... 
>>
>> https://www.pvelectronics.co.uk/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=43
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2024, at 07:16, Peter Doroba <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> This is the clock I made using Richard Scales B-8091 clock PCB.
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/groups/142414439207058/search/?q=b-8091
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 12:41:14 AM UTC-4 gregebert wrote:
>>
>>> Those are very valuable tubes, so if you are willing to design your own 
>>> driver and the PC board, I would do that. I've made several clocks and 
>>> never had a design problem that affected the tubes. Even if you find a 
>>> board to purchase, see if any of the following apply:
>>>
>>> Some of my suggestions:
>>> #1. I dont like sockets because they put stress on the tube pins. Some 
>>> of them grip the pins very hard and it's difficult to insert or remove the 
>>> tubes, which adds to the risk of bending or breaking the pins or putting 
>>> stress on the glass. Instead, I use socket pins soldered into the PCB, and 
>>> the force to insert/remove tubes is very low.
>>>
>>> #2. Direct drive. There's no need to multiplex individual tubes, and 
>>> there's no cost benefit when tubes are worth hundreds of dollars apiece and 
>>> the drive electronics is at most a few dollars. Multiplexing requires 
>>> higher current, and that degrades the tube's lifetime.
>>>
>>> #3. Use a current regulator, and set the current at the recommended spec 
>>> value; too high and you wear-out the tube. Too low and you risk cathode 
>>> poisoning. A single anode resistor per-tube is OK, but as the anode voltage 
>>> varies, so does the current (no such problem with a current regulator, 
>>> though). You can mitigate this by using a higher anode supply voltage and 
>>> larger anode resistor, at the expense of more wasted energy. As tubes age, 
>>> their striking voltage may increase, so having a higher anode voltage will 
>>> help mitigate this.
>>>
>>> #4. PIR sensor. Turn off the tubes if nobody is there to watch them.
>>>
>>> #5. Protect the tubes inside a case, and make sure there is enough 
>>> ventilation so the heat doesn't build-up inside. On my later designs I have 
>>> a thermal sensor (sometimes several) so that software can monitor critical 
>>> temperatures and shutdown if things get too warm.
>>>
>>> #6. Depoisoning routine to exercise all cathodes.
>>>
>>> #7. Backlighting (or base lighting). I havn't done this on any of my 
>>> clocks, and I've never had problems with tubes not firing-up. Others have 
>>> reported problems without backlighting. It can have aesthetic value, though 
>>> I'm not fond of it.
>>>
>>> That should cover the necessities for the tubes; there are always lots 
>>> of other features that can be done, especially if the clock has open-source 
>>> software (or you develop it on your own).
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, September 17, 2024 at 8:17:28 PM UTC-7 Chachi88 wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am climbing stairs from the foot of the mountain to sit at the feet 
>>>> of all you nixie gurus.
>>>>
>>>> What is the current state of the art for remote driver boards?  I am 
>>>> aware some of the older drivers are not as reliable or can cause the tubes 
>>>> to degrade quicker.  Some of the new options I am seeing have "cathode 
>>>> poisoning prevention"  I have recently come upon qty 6 of the NL8091's and 
>>>> their original sockets and socket mounting plate, which I wish to reuse 
>>>> for 
>>>> a clock. Are there any off the shelf boards even capable of driving this 
>>>> tube?  I was looking at a board on ebay that comes with an IR remote but 
>>>> it 
>>>> seems too good to be true, I would be willing to spend 5 times as much for 
>>>> a board that was properly documented and put together and had some sort of 
>>>> pedigree...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for any advice or direction you can give.
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bac36066-03e6-4a6e-a83a-69020b75572fn%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bac36066-03e6-4a6e-a83a-69020b75572fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/6d4df471-9eea-4c60-8b1e-62a2800cce37n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to