ironically this was in the next email i opened this morning. i havent read
it yet, but i thought i would post

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:25 AM, paul annen <[email protected]> wrote:

> very true, and i also imagined that the reserve battery would also
> function as the starting battery. with a 24v or higher system, i would
> recomend replacing the starter with one made for the higher voltages.
>
> it might make the bike feel totally different, but what about putting your
> hub motor in the front wheel?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Kurt Nolte <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I was actually imagining it going the other way, not sure why I didn't
>> make that clearer. I envision the motor pack also being the starting
>> battery, as well as the reserve battery.
>>
>> One or two 12V cells would be devoted as the "stock" battery, and with a
>> little coding one could even let the pack controller use the 12V alternator
>> to recondition cells as life goes on. Any retrofit package for this would
>> likely include a rewound alternator, however.
>>
>> I realize not all bikes have a rear drum hub, but then not all bikes have
>> a chain drive either so that wouldn't be universal either. My target market
>> is still largely drum rears, and it would be easy to swap a drum rear wheel
>> on those with only disc brakes back there; there are many options, factory
>> and aftermarket.
>>
>> Kurt.
>> On Feb 16, 2012 12:35 PM, "paul annen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> you are correct that higher volts will require less amps to do the same
>>> work (watts is watts is watts), and i do like the retrofit option, you
>>> could also fairly easily use that rear break to do
>>> some regenerative functions as well. but not all bikes have the option of a
>>> rear wheel hub design, you might be better off driving off the existing
>>> chain. this way you could also incorporate it as a chain tensioner.
>>>
>>> are you imagining using the bikes charging system? we all know that
>>> these are weak links in the vintage hondas (another side note was a thought
>>> to have a small 30amp automotive alt mounted on the swing arm with a
>>> sprocket to bypass the rectifier, spring pull the tension on the alt and
>>> you have an automatic chain tensioner)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Kurt Nolte 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds like a good idea for a Range Extended Battery Electric, which I
>>>> feel is probably where the auto industry is going to head, for better or
>>>> worse.
>>>>
>>>> I like the modular idea, especially the ability to add/subtract and
>>>> hot-swap battery packs. One of my primary ideas would actually be to devise
>>>> a "retrofit" package to hybridize most bikes with minimally invasive common
>>>> parts.
>>>>
>>>> The core concept its the use of a "hub" or "internal stator" motor
>>>> design, pressed into place of the rear drum brake. This allows for a direct
>>>> drive DC design, high torque and the ability to run electric-only for a
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> Rear braking would now be electric, using a variable resistor to
>>>> determine braking load, tied to the stock brake pedal. The motor
>>>> controller's speed sensor would allow for ABS functionality without
>>>> additional parts, as a bonus, and the whole motor assembly shouldn't add
>>>> more than a pound or two, tops.
>>>>
>>>> Using this, I'd also downsize the engine, generally by a 1/3 but
>>>> obviously dependant on the individual bike. The motor torque added in the
>>>> bottom end of the range would allow riders to feel like the engine its much
>>>> bigger.
>>>>
>>>> I think that both motor and pack should operate at high voltage,
>>>> preferably 36-72+V. This will allow for smaller, more flexible wires and
>>>> also provide a beneficial bump in torque. The pack can still be be charged
>>>> by a 12V alternator using the right connections and isolator circuits. High
>>>> voltage packs are also better for the controllers, limiting max current
>>>> flow.
>>>>
>>>> That's it from me for now, when I'm on a proper keyboard I'll add more.
>>>>
>>>> Kurt
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 16, 2012 10:42 AM, "paul annen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > well, my idea was to use as many stock Honda parts as i could, so
>>>> that i could market it to honda after. i also want to use a 24v system.
>>>> this is to make the charging system easy. motor controller and basic
>>>> battery set on the chassis with modular extra batteries in saddle bags and
>>>> a "trunk" with the engine and mobile charger (also modular). my
>>>> engine/mobile charger is about as simple as it gets, small engine (can
>>>> offer diffrent engine sets for gas, diesel, LP.... ) set at a constant rpm
>>>> coupled to a 24v automotive alt (yes they make them, mostly for bigger
>>>> trucks).
>>>> >
>>>> > the modular thought is that if your daily commute is short enough you
>>>> dont need the extra weight (and wear) from the engine and batteries, simply
>>>> plug it in to charge, but longer commutes the extra batteries might be
>>>> needed, for longer trips you will want to have the engine for "on the road"
>>>> charging. yes, while cruising you will probably use more power then the alt
>>>> can keep up with, but if you stop every so often (and leave the charging
>>>> engine running) you can build charge back up.
>>>> >
>>>> > my first concept was using standard car batteries, (i was 12, cut me
>>>> some slack) now i am thinking that li ion makes a much better choice, but
>>>> thats also where the modular design comes in, as battery tech improves, you
>>>> can upgrade without scrapping the whole bike.
>>>> >
>>>> > not that ive spent any time thinking about this at all.. comments
>>>> and suggestions are welcome..
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.

Reply via email to