On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:12:34 +0200, Henning Hraban Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Again, I don't think that bibliographies are basic.
But I'm no scientific user.

Actually, I think bibliographies are VERY basic. I edit an academic journal; each article has to have its own bib and m-bib can only be used once per document, and the (old) version I use has a few bugs (will try the latest version after some mission-critical stuff is out; I've (amateurishly) hacked the old version so that it at least does what I want for now).

But ConTeXt really needs a full-fledged bibliography solution as part of the basic package I think.

Question: in what context (no pun intended) do you use InDesign? Where is ConTeXt not so applicable?


Professor Idris Samawi Hamid
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
ntg-context mailing list

Reply via email to