Peter Tribble <peter.trib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Ben Rockwood <b...@cuddletech.com> wrote:
> > However, the OpenSolaris distribution ("Indiana") is reasonably within
> > the jurisdiction of the board.
>
> I don't believe that to be true. I don't think that Sun ever actually built
> Indiana; the current OpenSolaris distro isn't recognizable (to me, at
> least) as either anything the community has input to or a distro that
> might legitimately be described as Indiana as originally promoted.
This is why I doubt that it makes sense to use Indiana as a prototype
implementation that other distributions should follow for compatibility.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
ogb-discuss mailing list
ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
