Re: [Open_Gaming] OGL - Creature Collection

[Jason Lotito]

> Sure, but I want to use the names as well.  We know
> that the MM will have near 70% monsters released as
> OGC -don't you think WW could have released just ONE
> monster for other developers to use?  And I mean
> including THE NAME as that is certainly the most
> important part anyway.  They did not have to, I am
> just giving you feedback as a potential developer that
> it would have been helpful to me for WW to have
> released something I could use (once again, including
> the name).

Who do you think the book was developed for?  Developers or Consumers?  The
name is NOT the most important part.  I have used monster names
interchangeably for a long time, never with a problem.  The key is the
description, and that is not OGC. Fine..that is like me writing a ficitonal
novel and saying you can' reprint it.  So...the only thing you wanted was
the release of the name?  Why?

What is in a name?  A monster by any other name is just as horrific.



-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org