>>>"The name is NOT the most important part. "
Sure...tell that to:
Coca-Cola
Mickey Mouse
McDonalds
Disney
Tolkein (ie: the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings)
WOTC (Pokemon)
At 04:30 PM 10/16/2000, you wrote:
> > Sure, but I want to use the names as well. We know
> > that the MM will have near 70% monsters released as
> > OGC -don't you think WW could have released just ONE
> > monster for other developers to use? And I mean
> > including THE NAME as that is certainly the most
> > important part anyway. They did not have to, I am
> > just giving you feedback as a potential developer that
> > it would have been helpful to me for WW to have
> > released something I could use (once again, including
> > the name).
>
>Who do you think the book was developed for? Developers or Consumers? The
>name is NOT the most important part. I have used monster names
>interchangeably for a long time, never with a problem. The key is the
>description, and that is not OGC. Fine..that is like me writing a ficitonal
>novel and saying you can' reprint it. So...the only thing you wanted was
>the release of the name? Why?
>
>What is in a name? A monster by any other name is just as horrific.
>
>
>
>-------------
>For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
