Pack of hounds. ruff ruff ruff. Watch out for the
new "Baying Lotito" mastiff I am making. Don't worry
though, all bluff with no bite. :>
ps. Unfortunately, you will not be able to use it
Jason as only the stats and "combat" stuff will be
open.
--- Jason Lotito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sure, but I want to use the names as well. We
> know
> > that the MM will have near 70% monsters released
> as
> > OGC -don't you think WW could have released just
> ONE
> > monster for other developers to use? And I mean
> > including THE NAME as that is certainly the most
> > important part anyway. They did not have to, I am
> > just giving you feedback as a potential developer
> that
> > it would have been helpful to me for WW to have
> > released something I could use (once again,
> including
> > the name).
>
> Who do you think the book was developed for?
> Developers or Consumers? The
> name is NOT the most important part. I have used
> monster names
> interchangeably for a long time, never with a
> problem. The key is the
> description, and that is not OGC. Fine..that is like
> me writing a ficitonal
> novel and saying you can' reprint it. So...the only
> thing you wanted was
> the release of the name? Why?
>
> What is in a name? A monster by any other name is
> just as horrific.
>
>
>
> -------------
> For more information, please link to
www.opengamingfoundation.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
