From: "Marc Tassin, Ilium Software" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Maybe I am way off but that is the point of having a unique product.
>YOU thought of it and not someone else. Rules are one thing but I
>absolutley disagree with the suggestion that anyone should have an
>obligation (even if it is just a 'social' obligation) to release their
>creative property as Open. This is a business. Give everything away
>and there is no money.
I agree that there should be no obligation for creative content. I can't
imagine an economic reason why they don't want the names Open. The
"undercut with a softcover newsprint version" doesn't hold up as that could
be done anyway with the same stats and new names. I would think that the
most economic benefit would be gained by opening up the names so they can be
referred to in products (hopefully driving sales of the CC).
Walter
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
