It is my opinion that if I create a spell like "Bobs X Spell" and the stat block was all the OGC I used, then why should I be required to give away the other material that I might have put a lot of work into, especially if it was created for a specific world setting.
Jonathan M. Thompson Battlefield Press Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.battlefieldpress.com Makers of the Cityscape, Sherwood, and Pulp Fantasy Role Playing Games. "The resolve of our great nation is being tested. But make no mistake: We will show the world that we will pass this test." - George W Bush September 11, 2001 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lenze, Troy, (DC-Cap) Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:56 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Ogf-l] OGC Designation (Rant) What The Sigil was ranting about was things like where the name of a spell or monster are PI'd, so to use the monster or spell you need to change the name. This makes trying to find the spell or monster in the book it was taken from a lot harder and make the chain of OGC unclear. Also things like NPC's that have everything but the stat block as PI. That's pretty much an unusable bit of OGC, because all you can use is the statblock, not the actual character. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
