Of course we should contribute missing concepts - that's a given (and
the mechanisms for doing so are always improving), but read my post
again, that is not really the main problem with where we are now - I'm
talking about strategic directions.
- thomas
On 14/03/2018 23:19, Mikael Nyström wrote:
Hi Pablo,
I totally agree with you.
Regards
Mikael
*From:*openEHR-technical
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*Pablo Pazos
*Sent:* den 13 mars 2018 19:01
*To:* For openEHR clinical discussions
<[email protected]>
*Cc:* For openEHR technical discussions
<[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again
" but in some cases, /it is missing concepts/"
Shouldn't we contribute?
Is the same as openEHR, there are missing archetypes and we need the
community, users, clinical modelers and engineers to contribute.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
