> because the structures take care of all data points, not just coded > ones. But your /fils guides/ are rather special - they do the same > thing, unlike an ordinary grammar, so it's not really an argument. In > fact I would say that today we could derive a computable > transformation from the trees <=> ADL2 archetypes.
Yes... it just means adding the ADL concepts inside the ontology. > >> >> Such concept is described in a (already) 10 years old document >> (http://philippe.ameline.free.fr/download/texts/LigneDeVieForPrevention.pdf). > > yes this is an excellent document - it even has the distinction > between archetypes and (what we call) templates - the heading > 'Federating heterogeneous information'. I was fed at the proper source ;-) Philippe
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
