On 13/03/2018 21:25, Philippe Ameline wrote:
* So the question is: if we have formal models of the structured
form such as archetypes (maybe even FHIR profiles), why bother
with the grammar strings?
This is a pivotal question, but you may remember that I am used to
putting it the other way around: if you can tell something using a
vocabulary and a grammar, why bother having a formal model of
structured forms? ;-)
because the structures take care of all data points, not just coded
ones. But your /fils guides/ are rather special - they do the same
thing, unlike an ordinary grammar, so it's not really an argument. In
fact I would say that today we could derive a computable transformation
from the trees <=> ADL2 archetypes.
Such concept is described in a (already) 10 years old document
(http://philippe.ameline.free.fr/download/texts/LigneDeVieForPrevention.pdf).
yes this is an excellent document - it even has the distinction between
archetypes and (what we call) templates - the heading 'Federating
heterogeneous information'.
- thomas
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org