On 13/03/2018 21:25, Philippe Ameline wrote:
* So the question is: if we have formal models of the structured form such as archetypes (maybe even FHIR profiles), why bother with the grammar strings?This is a pivotal question, but you may remember that I am used to putting it the other way around: if you can tell something using a vocabulary and a grammar, why bother having a formal model of structured forms? ;-)
because the structures take care of all data points, not just coded ones. But your /fils guides/ are rather special - they do the same thing, unlike an ordinary grammar, so it's not really an argument. In fact I would say that today we could derive a computable transformation from the trees <=> ADL2 archetypes.
Such concept is described in a (already) 10 years old document (http://philippe.ameline.free.fr/download/texts/LigneDeVieForPrevention.pdf).
yes this is an excellent document - it even has the distinction between archetypes and (what we call) templates - the heading 'Federating heterogeneous information'.
- thomas
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
