Good point On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on the graduation - I agree with Kevan, that this (little) > community is on the right way. > > Instead of being a sub-project, I'd vote to have OWB becoming a TLP. > One reason is that by being "standalone" it is easier to ensure the project is > tied to closely to Geronimo, which makes distribution on other > containers easier. > > -Matthias > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Mohammad Nour > El-Din<[email protected]> wrote: >> -1 >> >> Allow me to disagree with you Gurkan, IMHO I think OWN should be a TLP >> project. I know it is to some extent related to JEE but IMO it defines >> a generic and extensible model for dependency injection and contextual >> programming which is not restricted to JEE, so being a sub-project to >> Geronimo will give the community users the impression that we only >> support JEE. I think we should follow the model of Tomcat and OpenEJB, >> which is a separate TLP and being integrable with other ASF projects >> like Geronimo for example. >> >> And for the communit, being a separate TLP will not be affected and we >> could get more contributers and committers and a big example on that >> is DBlevins. >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Mark Struberg<[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: Graduation? >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 8:23 PM >>>> Hi Kevan; >>>> >>>> Firstly its very good news for us! >>>> >>>> I personally think that we can continue to implement OWB as >>>> a sub-project under Geronimo. Geronimo has a stable >>>> community so we can also benefit from its diverse community >>>> and its reputation. Moreover, it ease the integration OWB >>>> with other Geronimo modules like EJB, JSF etc. >>>> >>>> So this is my +1 as it is a sub-project under Geronimo. >>>> >>>> --Gurkan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 6:00:44 PM >>>> Subject: Graduation? >>>> >>>> All, >>>> I wanted to checkpoint with the community about their >>>> thoughts regarding Incubator Graduation. I don't want the >>>> community to be too focused on implementation issues and >>>> forget about an important goal -- getting you out of the >>>> Apache Incubator! >>>> >>>> IMO, this community displays nearly all of the >>>> characteristics that I would look for from a successful >>>> Incubator project: you've successfully created several >>>> releases while operating in a clear, open, and welcoming >>>> manner. All of this while facing some significant challenges >>>> as the JSR 299 spec has been an ever shifting target. >>>> >>>> I'd like to see us moving towards graduation. To start >>>> things off, is the community interested in becoming a >>>> top-level project? Or would you rather graduate as a >>>> sub-project of an existing TLP? >>>> >>>> --kevan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour >> ---- >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" >> - Albert Einstein >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
