Another good point

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Hi Mohammad;
>>
>> Actually there is no reason not to accept your statements, you are totally
>> right! . Why I want to subproject under Geronimo is that its diverse
>> community(including user base) , and stable development activities.  Another
>> reason to be subproject is that until to now, we were not so successful to
>> extend our user community, for example;  a low mail traffic at OWB u...@...
>> list. But being subproject under Geronimo we can also get more attraction
>> from users.
>
> Once it is part of Geronimo - being integrated - and users start using it,
> they will be traffic on the OWB list. Keep in mind that this is a
> young standard.
> (and there were some negative comments in the wider JavaEE space about
> web-beans anyway - that maybe also a reason why folks aren't looking at it,
> yet) (I also have a hate/love affair with WebBeans ;-) )
>
>>
>> And one more reason is that  Geronimo may support ongoing development
>> activities to achieve OWB's being a full spec compliant. Geronimo has a
>> great experienced team who could help us to make this possible.
>
> that happens by default, as Geronimo has to have JSR 299 to be JavaEE6
> compliant. Geronimo helped us a lot on MyFaces 1.2. But still I am more
> confident with having a TLP.
>
>>
>> But as you said, definitely OWB can also be TLP as its own.
>>
>> What do other folks think about ?
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> --Gurkan
>>
>> 2009/9/9 Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]>
>>
>>> -1
>>>
>>> Allow me to disagree with you Gurkan, IMHO I think OWN should be a TLP
>>> project. I know it is to some extent related to JEE but IMO it defines
>>> a generic and extensible model for dependency injection and contextual
>>> programming which is not restricted to JEE, so being a sub-project to
>>> Geronimo will give the community users the impression that we only
>>> support JEE. I think we should follow the model of Tomcat and OpenEJB,
>>> which is a separate TLP and being integrable with other ASF projects
>>> like Geronimo for example.
>>>
>>> And for the communit, being a separate TLP will not be affected and we
>>> could get more contributers and committers and a big example on that
>>> is DBlevins.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Mark Struberg<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > LieGrue,
>>> > strub
>>> >
>>> > --- On Tue, 9/8/09, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> From: Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]>
>>> >> Subject: Re: Graduation?
>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>> >> Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 8:23 PM
>>> >> Hi Kevan;
>>> >>
>>> >> Firstly its very good news for us!
>>> >>
>>> >> I personally think that we can continue to implement OWB as
>>> >> a sub-project under Geronimo.  Geronimo has a stable
>>> >> community so we can also benefit from its diverse community
>>> >> and its reputation. Moreover, it ease the integration OWB
>>> >> with other Geronimo modules like EJB, JSF etc.
>>> >>
>>> >> So this is my +1 as it is a sub-project under Geronimo.
>>> >>
>>> >> --Gurkan
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ________________________________
>>> >> From: Kevan Miller <[email protected]>
>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 6:00:44 PM
>>> >> Subject: Graduation?
>>> >>
>>> >> All,
>>> >> I wanted to checkpoint with the community about their
>>> >> thoughts regarding Incubator Graduation. I don't want the
>>> >> community to be too focused on implementation issues and
>>> >> forget about an important goal -- getting you out of the
>>> >> Apache Incubator!
>>> >>
>>> >> IMO, this community displays nearly all of the
>>> >> characteristics that I would look for from a successful
>>> >> Incubator project: you've successfully created several
>>> >> releases while operating in a clear, open, and welcoming
>>> >> manner. All of this while facing some significant challenges
>>> >> as the JSR 299 spec has been an ever shifting target.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'd like to see us moving towards graduation. To start
>>> >> things off, is the community interested in becoming a
>>> >> top-level project? Or would you rather graduate as a
>>> >> sub-project of an existing TLP?
>>> >>
>>> >> --kevan
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>> - Mohammad Nour
>>> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
>>> ----
>>> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
>>> - Albert Einstein
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gurkan Erdogdu
>> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Reply via email to