Only thing is that CodeWarrior does not belong to 3Com but to Metrowerks. Different companies. Open sourcing doesnt necessarily means that problems will be fixed faster. Look at the Mozilla project and how long it's taking to achieve something because the code is so complicated. Chris At 12:16 AM 12/18/1999 -0800, you wrote: >Just a weird mid-night thought... > >... CodeWarrior is ported to Linux, BeOS; >Bugs we've talked hundred times got fixed; >Thousands of college students join PalmOS; >Apps are developed and more devices sold; >Is this a win-win-win (3COM-devloper-users)? > > --- Christian Vandendorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.zorglub.com
- Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWarrior? Horace Ho
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chuck Eckenroed
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Christian Vandendorpe
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chris Yourch
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Steve Sabram
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Tim Hewitt
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Eric Arseneau
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Catherine E. White
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Michael Brinkman
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Richard Hartman
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Jun-Kiat Lam
