Christian Vandendorpe wrote: > > Only thing is that CodeWarrior does not belong to 3Com but to Metrowerks. > Different companies. > > Open sourcing doesnt necessarily means that problems will be fixed faster. > Look at the Mozilla project and how long it's taking to achieve something > because the code is so complicated. > > Chris Heh, just want to jump in and defend here, as someone somewhat participating in Mozilla. The reason it's taking so long is because about 8 months into it they scrapped the whole code base completely, and started 100% from scratch. -- Brian Mathis Direct Edge http://www.directedge.com
- Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWarrior? Horace Ho
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chuck Eckenroed
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Christian Vandendorpe
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chris Yourch
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Steve Sabram
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Tim Hewitt
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Eric Arseneau
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Catherine E. White
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Michael Brinkman
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Richard Hartman
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Jun-Kiat Lam
