Brian Mathis wrote: > Horace Ho wrote: > > > > Just a weird mid-night thought... > > > > ... CodeWarrior is ported to Linux, BeOS; > > Bugs we've talked hundred times got fixed; > > Thousands of college students join PalmOS; > > Apps are developed and more devices sold; > > Is this a win-win-win (3COM-devloper-users)? > > OSS is not the panacea to everything, especially for companies who's > business it is to sell products. GCC is OSS, and available. > Also Metrowerks is now owned by Motorola and not 3Com. If you want OSS, use Gcc. Steve > > -- > Brian Mathis > Direct Edge > http://www.directedge.com
- Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWarrior? Horace Ho
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chuck Eckenroed
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Christian Vandendorpe
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chris Yourch
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Steve Sabram
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Tim Hewitt
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Eric Arseneau
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Catherine E. White
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Michael Brinkman
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Richard Hartman
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Jun-Kiat Lam
