Horace Ho wrote: > > Just a weird mid-night thought... > > ... CodeWarrior is ported to Linux, BeOS; > Bugs we've talked hundred times got fixed; > Thousands of college students join PalmOS; > Apps are developed and more devices sold; > Is this a win-win-win (3COM-devloper-users)? OSS is not the panacea to everything, especially for companies who's business it is to sell products. GCC is OSS, and available. -- Brian Mathis Direct Edge http://www.directedge.com
- Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWarrior? Horace Ho
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chuck Eckenroed
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Christian Vandendorpe
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Chris Yourch
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Brian Mathis
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Steve Sabram
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Tim Hewitt
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Eric Arseneau
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Catherine E. White
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Michael Brinkman
- RE: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Richard Hartman
- Re: Do you think 3COM should open-source CodeWa... Jun-Kiat Lam
