Hi!
Two friends of mine have Sigma 24/2.8 lens - one for Pentax AF mount,
another for Minolta mount. The pictures I've seen are not bad at all.
Especially if one takes into account price difference between Sigma
and similar native lens. Also construction of this very lens is very
good. It is mostly metal and it is sturdy.
Naturally, this is yet another bit of anecdotal evidence...
And of course, if one faces the choice between not having a certain
lens (focal length) all together and a reasonably 3rd party offer, I
think it is really no-brainer... At least so it seems for me... Humbly
of course...
Boris
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying Pat White
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying Pentxuser
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying Brendan
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying Alan Chan
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying Brendan
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying David Madsen
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Camdir
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying Alan Chan
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Alan Chan
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Ryan Lee
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Boris Liberman
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Alan Chan
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Cotty
- RE: Henry's Camera very annoying Cotty
- Was: Henry's Camera very annoying, + annoying things Malcolm Smith
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Pentxuser
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Cotty
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Ryan Lee
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Cotty
- Re: Henry's Camera very annoying Alan Chan

