Tom C wrote: > Yeah it was condescending. True enough. I apologize. :-) > > Nothing wrong with well executed snapshots either. > > My point is probably multi-fold. > > Most people probably will not notice or look for the difference between 4x6 > size snapshots of any DSLR. However, they may read a review, and when they > read that the out-of-camera .jpg is lacking in sharpness and/or dynamic > range (regardless of whether they understand the terms) from Pentax, they > may look elsewhere. > > If I and others know this, why doesn't Pentax? > > Tom C. >
Because, as even Phil Askey admits, the 'issue' is typically not visible in prints up to A3 in size, but only when pixel-peeping at 100%. In other words, it's irrelevant. -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
