I suspect that people who don't shoot RAW don't realise that it is not very time-consuming at all once you get the hang of it, and provided you use good software.
I use Silkypix, having changed over from Capture One LE. I find that I can get better colour balance with Silkypix than I could with C1, and the batch processing means that it takes very little time to convert 100 or more images. In most cases I can then save to JPEG without having to use a conventional image editor like Photoshop. John On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:50:19 -0000, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ken > but would'nt TIF be the ideal solution then? > greetings > Markus > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > K.Takeshita > Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 5:08 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K10D review online > > > On 12/15/06 11:00 PM, "K.Takeshita", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Shooting JPEG is >>> like buying a Ferrari and driving at 30mph. >> >> Not necessarily. > > What I meant is that, getting the best possible results from jpeg right > out > of camera, not leaving everything with post-processing, requires skill > and > understanding of what you are doing. > > But then, there are many who do not even know what RAW means and just > shoot > with whatever they have like P&S, spitting out jpeg only. And that's OK. > That's their style and as long as they are happy and can enjoy > photography..... > Some jpeg outputs are pretty good these days, DigiRebels for example > produce pretty good jpeg which appeal to average mass (Canon deliberately > tune so anyway). > > Ken > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
