Actually, in this case, TIFF would simply be JPEG without the compression. The 'issue' is with the processing, not the final file format (unlike say a JPEG artifacting issue, which would be with the JPEG compression itself).
-Adam Markus Maurer wrote: > Hi Ken > but would'nt TIF be the ideal solution then? > greetings > Markus > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > K.Takeshita > Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 5:08 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: K10D review online > > > On 12/15/06 11:00 PM, "K.Takeshita", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Shooting JPEG is >>> like buying a Ferrari and driving at 30mph. >> Not necessarily. > > What I meant is that, getting the best possible results from jpeg right out > of camera, not leaving everything with post-processing, requires skill and > understanding of what you are doing. > > But then, there are many who do not even know what RAW means and just shoot > with whatever they have like P&S, spitting out jpeg only. And that's OK. > That's their style and as long as they are happy and can enjoy > photography..... > Some jpeg outputs are pretty good these days, DigiRebels for example > produce pretty good jpeg which appeal to average mass (Canon deliberately > tune so anyway). > > Ken > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
