Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martijn van Oosterhout napsal(a): >> Not necessarily. pg_class is not shared yet without it you can't even >> find pg_database. Same deal with pg_type. All it means is that >> pg_collation in template1 must contain all the collations used in >> template1, which shouldn't be hard to arrange.
> I think, Collation situation is different, All the argument here is based on the premise that we should have database-level collation specifications, which AFAICS is not required nor suggested by the SQL spec. I wonder why we are allowing a nonstandard half-measure to drive our thinking, rather than solving the real problem which is column-level collations. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers