Hello Bruce,
 
What is the serial number of the reproducer on your machine and do you have a 
N-56 for it?
 
I am trying to get an idea of serial numbers of the Diamond B reproducers from 
1914.
 
Steve
 
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:47:54 +0000
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola 75 serial numbers
> 
> Do you have the same information on the Amberola V ? Mine is serial number 
> 845 . 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> From: "Andrew Baron" <[email protected]> 
> To: "Antique Phonograph List" <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 2:04:08 PM 
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola 75 serial numbers 
> 
> Thanks Al for these serial numbers. It's great to be able to put my Amberola 
> 50 in context of the total production, not only of its own model, but of the 
> series as a whole. 
> 
> Andrew Baron 
> 
> On Aug 25, 2013, at 12:14 AM, [email protected] wrote: 
> 
> > 
> > The highest Amberola 30 I recorded is just below 344000. The highest 
> > Amberola 50 I have recorded is just over 43000. The highest Amberola 75 in 
> > my data mine is just over 21000. So, Steve Medved's reproducer number is in 
> > the ballpark for production figures... 
> > Regards to all, 
> > Al 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Andrew Baron <[email protected]> 
> > To: Antique Phonograph List <[email protected]> 
> > Sent: Sat, Aug 24, 2013 7:49 pm 
> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola 75 serial numbers 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Steve ~ Do you have a sense of whether my nickel Diamond C reproducer 
> > 48233 
> > would be original to my Amberola 50 Serial #5662? Also, any idea when the 
> > Diamond C went from nickel to black paint (year and serial number, more or 
> > less)? 
> > 
> > At a glance it seems the serial number of my Diamond C is way too high for 
> > my 
> > machine unless one factors in the greater number of Amberola 30's being 
> > produced. Still seems like a high reproducer number for the 4-digit machine 
> > serial number, but I'd like to get your opinion. This Amberola 50 is 
> > otherwise 
> > one of the best-preserved I've seen, decent and original outside, mint 
> > under the 
> > lid, very quiet and smooth "low mile" motor, etc. 
> > 
> > Andrew Baron 
> > 
> > 
> > On Aug 24, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Steven Medved wrote: 
> > 
> >> It is a fairly low serial number, I worked on Amberola 30 number 137. My 
> >> 50 
> > is SM - - - 7488. I believe the 30 50 and 75 all had their own serial 
> > numbers 
> > as 137 had reproducer serial number 307 on it. SM is spring motor and 
> > number 
> > 137 did not have that on the ID plate. 
> >> 
> >> I believe just under 310,000 of the 30 50 and 75, 60, and 80's were made 
> >> as I 
> > have not seen a Diamond D reproducer over 310,000. 
> >> 
> >> Steve 
> >> 
> >>> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 18:15:24 -0700 
> >>> From: [email protected] 
> >>> To: [email protected] 
> >>> Subject: [Phono-L] Amberola 75 serial numbers 
> >>> 
> >>> Hello all 
> >>> I just noticed that the Amberola 75 I purchased at the APS show a couple 
> >>> of 
> > weeks ago is serial numbered SM - - - 7072. The three dashes appear on the 
> > ID 
> > plate. I had not noticed this on other machines. Is this a low serial 
> > number? 
> >>> Also, the drawers do not have the clips for record boxes in them as did 
> >>> my 
> > last 75. I thought at first that the drawers were replacements, but on 
> > close 
> > inspection they seem to be original, with no screw holes for the clips. Can 
> > anyone enlighten me? Did the earlier machines not have the clips? Or did 
> > the 
> > earlier ones HAVE the clips and later ones don't? 
> >>> Thanks 
> >>> John Robles 
> >>> _______________________________________________ 
> >>> Phono-L mailing list 
> >>> http://phono-l.org 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> >> Phono-L mailing list 
> >> http://phono-l.org 
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Phono-L mailing list 
> > http://phono-l.org 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Phono-L mailing list 
> > http://phono-l.org 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Phono-L mailing list 
> http://phono-l.org 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.org
                                          
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.org

Reply via email to