Hi Erik, > Another question about methods, while we're on the topic... For most of my > 'dm's the first argument is implied. For example, > > [dm message-add-int32> (N) > ... ] > > is expected to be called with the message (external symbol) followed by the > number to be added to the message. The message is then accessed by the '(: > ptr)' in the body. Is this the right way to do it, or should I make it more > explicit? Seemed to work as I was playing around with it, so I kept it, > even though I don't fully understand why it works.
As far as I understand it, this seems fine to me. In any case, experimenting with the various ways is the best. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
