On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 12:32 +0100, Enda Dunican wrote: > Yes I agree with this last email. If there was an ideal language out > there everybody would be using it. Be prepared to be browbeaten from > the soapbox when you start a topic like this.
Or it could have been an excellent exchange of people's experiences with an interesting pool of ideas created. It is a pity this email stifled that. > Enda > > > Can I perhaps pre-empt a pile of responses in this soon-to-be-long > thread with > my following meta-response: > > "I think you should use <insert favourite language here> because <insert > standard reasons here>. In particular I've run into problems with > <insert > non-favourite language here> because <insert anecdote here>. You may > also > want to take into account <insert checklist of features of favourite > language > here> which isn't handled too well by <insert non-favourite language > here>. > Disclaimer: This worked for me but may not work for you, so shop > around". > > If everyone could just fill out the template it'd save a lot of time. > > Peter :-). > -- Russel. ============================================================ Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: http://www.russel.org.uk/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part