Simon Yes indeed, what I see on your site does represent what I saw in real life when you showed me the original test prints. Banding obvious to the naked eye on all Canon prints, with none on the comparison Epson prints we made from the same file via my Epson 2100!
John ----- Original Message ----- From: "SimonMartin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: Re: [PRODIG] Canon i9100 story/big favour needed/am I going nuts or what...? > Shangara, > On Thursday, July 31, 2003, at 01:25 PM, Shangara Singh wrote: > > How about uploading a scan of the affected area? > > I didn't think I would get the lines to show up with my toy scanner. > The fact that they do show is testament to how obvious they are... > > Have a look at the two 'bwstepwedge' files here > <http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mailonix/canontest/>, there's a tif and a > jpg of the same scan. I have adjusted the levels a bit to bring the > lines out but it will nevertheless show you what I am on about. > > Perhaps John Begg can attest to the fact that this is a reasonable > representation of the problem. The lines can easily be seen with the > naked eye. > > Let me know what you think. I'll pass comments on to Canon one final > time. > > I really want this printer! It has separate ink tanks, an easily > replaceable head, it's A3 and not an Epson. If only I could get decent > prints from it... :-) > > Thanks again > > Simon > > Simon Martin > London Uk > 020 8386 5828 > =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
