Great so we're not missing much after all! I wish someone at Protel was
assigned to documentation. (And if there is, then the fact I simply wished
there were is an indication the job isn't being fulfilled properly.)

I understand holes in the documentation exist, but with the internet
available, there is no reason why they can't update the docs and post them.
The manual has been poor all along, and with each rev and acquisition, it
gets further behind.

Tony



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:14 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel usage
>
>
> Hi
>
> I have the designer handbook of Protel99SE. I submit that simulator,
> signal integrity and PLD is poorly documented.
>
> Wolfgang Geier
>
> JUMPtec AG

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to