To all, I will second that rule to do the preview. I was in a situation where IF had I done it I would have realized what it did to me before I just went on fat dump an happy making changes to an existing design. The 99SE synchronizer works very well. I have completed many designs now (being a newcommer) with no problems other than like above self induced. I do however agree with the person talking about how Protel updates board and schematic from library, it is a little less than I had hoped for in my setup. I really wish the footprints would REALLY update all symbols from the library. It does but it will not use those new footprints on a board you need to go into th eschematic for each unique part and force it to that new footprint. ie if you get properties of the symbol you see a pulldowm menu for footprint which now does contain the new part too BUT until you select the new footprint you will still see the old footprint on the board.
Bob Robert M. Wolfe, C.I.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:03 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] multi sheet problems > At 08:09 PM 12/20/01 -0500, Brian Guralnick wrote: > >It may look > >potentially bug prone, but I've learned to always do a "Preview Changes", > >then "Apply > >changes" instead of just "Execute" to help with the feeling that > >everything will get > >messed up. After 2 to 3 times with a simple PCB, you will never want to > >go back to > >the old ways. > > Mr. Guralnick's process is recommended, particularly when only a few > changes are being made. It only takes a moment to look over a few macros > and confirm that everything looks okay. > > >However, I have learned not to use the update with old PCB98 documents > >unless I have > >completely made sure that all of the old libs conform within my latest P99 > >setup. > > As far as I know, there is no problem with older designs if you don't allow > footprint updates. You might consider running update once without allowing > footprint changes, then run it again allowing it and see if any macros are > created.... > > Again, as far as I have seen, no changes are made unless a macro is created > and accepted. Another reason to get in the habit of previewing changes. > It's too easy to change a footprint and not notice it until a few hours > later when all the backups have been overwritten. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Abdulrahman Lomax > Easthampton, Massachusetts USA > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://firstname.lastname@example.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *