Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > > At 10:55 AM 1/30/2002 -0400, Tim Fifield wrote: > >I get a "Warning: Unconnected net label on net ..." when I run ERC in the > >Sch editor. I'm trying to label a bus line with a the following net label > >AD[15..0] > > Others pointed out the problem with naming the individual nets as AD[0] > etc., but I have not personally tested bus labels of the form BUS[n..m] > where n>m. The examples in the manual and that I have used would have > AD[0..15], not AD[15..0]. It might not make any difference if Protel has > built a little more intelligence into the program than I might expect, but > it also would not make any difference if the bus labels were not used with > ports, since the bus label really only functions to link sheet entries and > ports to nets, bus labels are otherwise cosmetic. > > In other words, this particular problem was with the net names. But there > might also be a problem with the bus name. If anyone has seen decremented > names work in a functioning bus label, let us know! > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Abdulrahman Lomax > Easthampton, Massachusetts USA
I recalled having a problem with [0..15] vs [15..0] in the past, but checked a recent job and found I had used both orders on it (for different busses). -- Peter Bennett TRIUMF 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada GPS and NMEA info and programs: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *