i agree that something which was obviously presented as a 'buy me'
feature and which has no benefit other than to impress a Dilbert type
manager should either have been fixed, improved or at least apologized
for.
(BTW, it is ok to end a sentence with a preposition, advice to the
contrary notwithstanding)

as to the refund check i don't think that it is either in the mail or
part of the license agreement

in fact if the present trend continues (and i hate to float any new
ideas), and not in particular to Protel, we will soon have to PAY to
report bugs ('bugs' otherwise in other fields of endeavor more properly
referred to as 'errors' or 'mistakes' or 'oversights')

of course as the future seems to portend (UCITA anyone?) after our time
limited use EULA runs out we will not have to PAY for the right to be
able to report 'bugs', we will simply be out of business

Dennis Saputelli


Andrew Jenkins wrote:
> 
> On 05:09 PM 2/7/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Protel should either fix it or send out refund checks.
> 

-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
www.integratedcontrolsinc.com            Integrated Controls, Inc.    
   tel: 415-647-0480                        2851 21st Street          
      fax: 415-647-3003                        San Francisco, CA 94110

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to