Jeepers Brian why didn't you say so earlier?

I tried your patch but found it a bit clunky and I think it had a refresh
problem as well.

Now you tell me all I have to do is undock the placement tools 
toolbar - and voila! No more panning problems. Doh!

Thanks for the tip.

Tom.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 4:55 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Auto-Pan patch <was> Speaking of Protel Bugs.
> 
> 
>     For those of you who didn't figure it out:
> 
>   "My auto-pan patch is a FULLY FUNCTIONAL insult to Protel."
> 
>     All I did was place 2 or more "Always On Top" windows 
> over Protel's display screen.
> 
>     This is why some people who have ATI & Matrox video 
> cards, or any other problematic brands, do not experience the 
> lockup of the
> mouse.  IT'S BECAUSE THEY HAVE 1 OR MORE TOOL BARS OVER THE 
> PROTEL PCB WINDOW.  This is IDENTICAL as having my 2 dummy windows, in
> my pan patch, over your Protel screen.
> 
>     For years now, Protel has had issues with panning-mouse 
> snagging, & if a fully functional fix is to add a few small windows
> always on top of Protel's display refresh area, then 
> something fundamentally weird with how Protel works within 
> the system when
> panning the screen.
> 
>     Perhaps at Protel, the panning issue never comes up, 
> because, they always test their software with the default tool applets
> floating over the PCB work area.  I like to place my tool 
> applets snapped along a vertical, or horizontal border.  This does not
> count since Protel doesn't have to draw beneath these tool windows.
> 
> ____________
> Brian Guralnick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice (514) 624-4003
> Fax (514) 624-3631
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Terry Creer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Auto-Pan patch <was> Speaking of Protel Bugs.
> 
> 
> > I've got a funny feeling he's talking about yours, Brian
> >
> > TC
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 3:27 PM
> > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Auto-Pan patch <was> Speaking of Protel Bugs.
> >
> >
> > > 2. ) I am also betting that the anti-intuitave panning is 
> still there (yes
> > > Ian, I know that you like it, and I know that you wrote a 
> routine to fx
> > it,
> > > but it still is backwards and unlike no other system in 
> the world).
> > >
> > > JaMi Smith
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Ian has an auto-pan patch?  What does it do?  Where can I get it?
> >
> > ____________
> > Brian Guralnick
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Voice (514) 624-4003
> > Fax (514) 624-3631
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "JaMi Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "JaMi Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:22 PM
> > Subject: [PEDA] Speaking of Protel Bugs.
> >
> >
> > > Speaking of Protel Bugs . . .
> > >
> > > What are the odds on whether your favorite Bug has been 
> fixed in DXP?
> > >
> > > 1. ) I am betting that the Keyboard / Mouse problem that 
> has been there
> > > since Protel 98 has not been fixed.
> > >
> > > 2. ) I am also betting that the anti-intuitave panning is 
> still there (yes
> > > Ian, I know that you like it, and I know that you wrote a 
> routine to fx
> > it,
> > > but it still is backwards and unlike no other system in 
> the world).
> > >
> > > 3. ) I am also betting that Protel's "Print Dialogue" box 
> is also still
> > > backwards as compared to the rest of the world (For those 
> that don't
> > > consider the way that Protel handles printing a bug, go 
> play with Adobe
> > > Acrobat (or any other Windows Application) for a while 
> then come back to
> > > Protel to see how it it is not done right). Also, show me 
> one other major
> > > application in the Windows world that has a Print Icon on 
> a toolbar that
> > > invokes a Printer Dialog Box that will not print anything 
> at all, as the
> > one
> > > in the PCB 3-D View (It only does printer setup).
> > >
> > > 4. ) I guess my one real question will be what have the done with
> > Schematic.
> > > Will it still act like a bastard sibling that has been 
> hastily patched
> > into
> > > a system where it is totally foreign "function" wise, or have they
> > actually
> > > taken the time to properly integrate it into the 
> environment so that
> > things
> > > like panning, zooming, and function keys, will work the 
> same as within the
> > > other applications.
> > >
> > > Who's giving what odds?
> > >
> > > What else do you have for the list?
> > >
> > > No fair on you guys who have been beta testing letting 
> the cat out of the
> > > bag.
> > >
> > > JaMi Smith
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> **************************************************************
> **********
> > > * Tracking #: 194767ADA7AA1E4E85C23695D58B302A7C6D1DC3
> > > *
> > > 
> **************************************************************
> **********
> >
> >
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *
> > * To leave this list visit:
> > * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
> > *
> > * Contact the list manager:
> > * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *
> > * Forum Guidelines Rules:
> > * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
> > *
> > * Browse or Search previous postings:
> > * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to