Andrew Dupont wrote: > That bothers me because simply querying '#story p:first-letter' > modifies the document. $$ is a mechanism for reading nodes, not > modifying them, so I think the confusion this would cause would > outweigh any syntactic elegance. > I agree. And that give me a much better picture of the vision for the $$ roadmap.
It would seem that additions in order of usefulness would be something like this: :not(s) :checked :enabled :disabled :first-child :last-child :empty :only-child :nth-child(n) :nth-last-child(n) :first-of-type :target :last-of-type :nth-of-type(n) :nth-last-of-type(n) I'll start drafting and testing my ideas for the top few. Regards, Ken --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
