Hi Darren,

Not yet. The next release will have the 512x256 compatibility, the
rescaling, the paging and the command line parameter.

The first two are done, the third is working but needs more work, and the
last is still to do.

Should take a few days.

Rgds,

D.

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Darren Branagh via Ql-Users <
ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Have you released any of your updates yet?
>
> Just wondering if they can be tested.
>
> Darren Branagh
>
> Sent from My Android Phone.
>
> On 10 Sep 2017 23:18, "Bob Spelten via Ql-Users" <ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Op Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:19:22 +0200 schreef Daniel Baum via Ql-Users <
> > ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>:
> >
> > One more thing:
> >>
> >> I should add that limiting the number of displayed records to 1000 works
> >> fine, so I could fix the problem by using a paging arrangement.
> >>
> >> The test _dbs has 3111 records by 6 fields making 18666 menu items.
> > That is well within the limit of items (<32K) WMAN2 can handle in the AW.
> > Records times Fields must be less.
> > But there is also a limit in S*Basic of 65K for indexing second and third
> > dimensions, in this case Fields x Field_length (including length word).
> > As you used Fields as the first dimension instead, 2nd (Records: 3111)
> > times 3rd (length: 20 +2) would be just too much.
> > As records will in most cases be the highest number, making it the first
> > dimension is the best choice.
> > So checking these limits and using paging is the only option for a large
> > database that exceed these limits.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > --
> > The BSJR QL software site at: "http://members.upc.nl/b.spelten/ql/";
> > _______________________________________________
> > QL-Users Mailing List
> >
> _______________________________________________
> QL-Users Mailing List
>
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List

Reply via email to