On 2 Feb 2018 at 16:25, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: > Well, I said I'd do it and apparently I did it: > > https://www.kilgus.net/2018/02/02/clonetastic-ql-sd-clone-working-with-goldcard-clone/
What surprises me is this: "With the original Verilog code my clone didn't work at all, so it's definitely not just the different chip." With a normal GC, the original QL-SD worked relatively well, compared to the SGC. On some GC systems it was even fully stable hardware-wise. So if we assume that the electrical characteristics of the XC9572 play a minor role, why did it not work _at_all_? A significant difference between Original GC and Tetroid? Peter _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List
