On 2 Feb 2018 at 16:25, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote:
> Well, I said I'd do it and apparently I did it:
What surprises me is this: "With the original Verilog code my clone
didn't work at all, so it's definitely not just the different chip."
With a normal GC, the original QL-SD worked relatively well,
compared to the SGC. On some GC systems it was even fully stable
hardware-wise. So if we assume that the electrical characteristics
of the XC9572 play a minor role, why did it not work _at_all_?
A significant difference between Original GC and Tetroid?
QL-Users Mailing List