we are not talking about legacy, we are talking about creating contents. Creating contents cost money too. Sm
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Lc <[email protected]> wrote: > i gave up > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ryan McDougall <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Lc <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi all >> > >> > Quote: >> > There is no current release plan for ModreX except to get as much of >> > it done as soon as possible. It is the server component we will be >> > developing the viewer component against, so it needs to be done for >> > reX-NG. Probably the first "release" of it will be as a whole as >> > "reX-NG". >> > >> > I disagree with that. Some of us want to test modrex in our grid. We >> need at >> > least a regular working modrex from time to time in order to create, >> test >> > contents. >> > Modrex without contents will be a failure and according the high >> technicity >> > behind Rex, it won't be easy to bring creators working on it. >> > >> > Providing a binary will more than enough at the moment. >> > >> > Thanks to think about that. >> > Sacha >> >> I think there is nothing wrong with community contributed binaries >> based on what is publicly available. >> >> Please understand that with our extremely limited resources, any time >> spent making ModreX work on legacy demos means we are not spending >> time on the future. >> >> That is not to say no one can make ModreX work where you want it to, >> it just means the community has to step in a contribute what they >> need. Scratch their own itch as it is. >> >> If there is something you need from reX, and you want to do it >> yourself, let me know and I'll do what it takes to enable you to help >> yourself. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ this list: http://groups.google.com/group/realxtend realXtend home page: http://www.realxtend.org/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
