I started with permissive, then just disabled altogether. SELinux is not 
the cause.

$ grep SELINUX /etc/selinux/config
SELINUX=disabled


On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 10:34:41 AM UTC-6, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 07:32 -0800, Justin Palmer wrote: 
> > > "didn't work" 
> > 
> > 
> > Meaning that the same display problem occurred after first installing 
> > Review Board via Yum. 
> > 
> > 
> > > "isn't kept up to date" 
> > 
> > 
> > # cat /etc/redhat-release 
> > CentOS Linux release 6.0 (Final) 
> > # yum list ReviewBoard 
> > Available Packages 
> > ReviewBoard.noarch                       1.7.27-1.el6 
> > epel 
> > 
>
> Ah, right. The problem with CentOS 6 is that a lot of the dependencies 
> in the distribution are old. I have been working on backporting 2.x to 
> that distribution, but it's slow going. I keep EPEL 7 up to date though. 
>
>
> > 
> > Installing via easy_install allowed me to pick up 2.0.12. 
> > 
> > 
> > > generally release updated versions into the epel-testing repository 
> > within 48 hours 
> > 
> > 
> > That's great! Thanks for this work. Native package management is 
> > definitely easier on users. 
> > 
>
> Yeah, that's my thought as well. 
>
> > 
> > > *should* be the preferred way to run Review Board on RHEL/CentOS 7 
> > 
> > 
> > I know that enterprise Linux distributions prefer not to change major 
> > versions, apis, etc. So while keeping up to date is a nice goal, you 
> > may hit resistance. I suppose that's when you introduce a number after 
> > the package name, e.g. ReviewBoard3. :-) 
> > 
>
> Well, this is more a matter of getting the dependencies packaged. Review 
> Board has a very good upgrade path and backwards-compatibility, so it's 
> definitely a candidate to update once I can get the dependencies lined 
> up properly. 
>
>
> > Christian stopped responding. I wonder if he ran out of ideas. Has 
> > anyone else deployed on RHEL/CentOS lately? How'd it go? 
> > 
> > 
>
> I've deployed it on RHEL 7 numerous times. The thing you might be 
> hitting is SELinux; right now we have no SELinux policy shipped with 
> Review Board, so it's possible that some of the content is getting 
> blocked. Can you try running 'sudo setenforce 0' and see if that clears 
> things up? 
>
> I'm working on making some changes on the Fedora side of things so that 
> if you deploy a site into /var/lib/reviewboard/sites, it will get all 
> the appropriate SELinux labels. This is not ready yet, but hopefully 
> within the next month. 
>
> > 
> > 
> > On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 9:00:33 AM UTC-6, Stephen Gallagher 
> > wrote: 
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 17:41 -0800, Justin Palmer wrote: 
> >         > I started with: 
> >         > 
> >         > 
> >         > $ yum install httpd mod_wsgi postgresql-server ReviewBoard 
> >         > $ service postgresql initdb 
> >         > $ service postgresql start 
> >         > $ createdb reviewboard 
> >         > $ createuser -P 
> >         > $ psql... grant all... 
> >         > $ rb-site install... 
> >         > $ chown -R... 
> >         > $ echo "Include apache-wsgi.conf" >> httpd.conf 
> >         > $ service httpd start 
> >         > 
> >         > 
> >         > 
> >         > 
> >         > When this didn't work and I realized it isn't kept 
> >         up-to-date, I went 
> >         > the easy_install route. 
> >         > 
> >         
> >         Umm, what do you mean by "didn't work" and "isn't kept up to 
> >         date"? 
> >         
> >         I maintain the EPEL 7 packages for ReviewBoard and generally 
> >         release 
> >         updated versions into the epel-testing repository within 48 
> >         hours of the 
> >         upstream release (in the case of 2.0.12, it was within 12 
> >         hours). 
> >         
> >         I'd love to know what was not working, so I can fix it... This 
> >         really 
> >         *should* be the preferred way to run Review Board on 
> >         RHEL/CentOS 7. 
> >         
> > -- 
> > Get the Review Board Power Pack at 
> > http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ 
> > --- 
> > Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ 
> > --- 
> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
> > --- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "reviewboard" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> > an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>
>

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to