rrg  

Messages by Date

• 2008/07/09 [RRG] Terminology RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/09 [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/09 [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Christian Vogt
• 2008/07/09 RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator louise.burness
• 2008/07/09 [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Christian Vogt
• 2008/07/09 [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Christian Vogt
• 2008/07/09 re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Xu Xiaohu
• 2008/07/08 re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Xu Xiaohu
• 2008/07/08 Re: re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Hongbin Luo
• 2008/07/08 re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Xu Xiaohu
• 2008/07/08 re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Xu Xiaohu
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format William Herrin
• 2008/07/08 RE: [RRG] perceived privacy issue Peter Sherbin
• 2008/07/08 RE: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Tony Li
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format William Herrin
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] perceived privacy issue William Herrin
• 2008/07/08 RE: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Tony Li
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Possible Identifier Properties HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Dino Farinacci
• 2008/07/08 RE: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format Tony Li
• 2008/07/08 RE: [RRG] perceived privacy issue Tony Li
• 2008/07/08 [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/08 [RRG] perceived privacy issue RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Lixia Zhang
• 2008/07/08 [RRG] Possible Identifier Properties RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/08 RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Tony Li
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Lixia Zhang
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Terminology redux William Herrin
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Terminology redux Scott Brim
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Terminology redux Scott Brim
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Terminology redux Noel Chiappa
• 2008/07/08 [RRG] Terminology redux RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/08 Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator William Herrin
• 2008/07/08 RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Tony Li
• 2008/07/07 Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/07/07 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/07 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/07/07 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Peter Sherbin
• 2008/07/04 re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Xu Xiaohu
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator William Herrin
• 2008/07/04 RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Tony Li
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Should the identifier be used as local locator Scott Brim
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Should the identifier be used as local locator Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Peter Sherbin
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Marshall Eubanks
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Peter Sherbin
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator Scott Brim
• 2008/07/04 [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator RJ Atkinson
• 2008/07/04 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/03 [RRG] Should the identifier be used as local locator Xu Xiaohu
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Joel M. Halpern
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Scott Brim
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Tom Petch
• 2008/07/03 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/07/02 RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Tony Li
• 2008/07/02 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/07/02 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Scott Brim
• 2008/07/02 RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Tony Li
• 2008/07/02 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Robert Bonomi
• 2008/07/02 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Scott Brim
• 2008/07/02 RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Noel Chiappa
• 2008/07/02 RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Peter Sherbin
• 2008/07/02 RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Noel Chiappa
• 2008/07/01 RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Tony Li
• 2008/07/01 Re: lisp-interest archive? [Re: [RRG] Re: LISP-ALT's long path problem again] David Meyer
• 2008/06/30 lisp-interest archive? [Re: [RRG] Re: LISP-ALT's long path problem again] Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/30 RE: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Templin, Fred L
• 2008/06/30 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/30 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/30 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/06/30 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Scott Brim
• 2008/06/30 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Scott Brim
• 2008/06/30 RE: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Templin, Fred L
• 2008/06/29 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF David Meyer
• 2008/06/29 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF David Meyer
• 2008/06/29 [RRG] Re: LISP-ALT's long path problem again Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/29 [RRG] LISP-ALT's long path problem again Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/29 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/29 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Marshall Eubanks
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? David Conrad
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/06/28 [RRG] OITRDs & PTRs: "partial deployment" support of packets from non-ITR networks Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? David Conrad
• 2008/06/28 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Re: Not separate namespaces: Loc-ID-separation, map-encap etc. Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? David Conrad
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Re: Not separate namespaces: Loc-ID-separation, map-encap etc. Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Yakov Rekhter
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Re: Not separate namespaces: Loc-ID-separation, map-encap etc. Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Yakov Rekhter
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/27 [RRG] Re: Not separate namespaces: Loc-ID-separation, map-encap etc. Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Yakov Rekhter
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Yakov Rekhter
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? David Williamson
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Joel M. Halpern
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/27 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/27 [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF Jari Arkko
• 2008/06/26 [RRG] Not separate namespaces: Loc-ID-separation, map-encap etc. Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/26 [RRG] Committees vs. small teams, IPv4 fix absolutely required Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... David Conrad
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Stephen Sprunk
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? David Conrad
• 2008/06/26 [RRG] Map-encap can & will reduce the cost of multihoming Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Eliot Lear
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/26 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Yakov Rekhter
• 2008/06/25 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/25 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/25 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? James Kempf
• 2008/06/25 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? James Kempf
• 2008/06/25 RE: [RRG] IPv4: how bad, when to fix? Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/25 RE: [RRG] IPv4: how bad, when to fix? Marcus Brunner
• 2008/06/24 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space David Conrad
• 2008/06/24 [RRG] Take 2: AA, BB, CC Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/24 [RRG] IPv4: how bad, when to fix? Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/24 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/24 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Yakov Rekhter
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Shane Amante
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/23 re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Xu Xiaohu
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Dino Farinacci
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Scott Brim
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Scott Brim
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? James Kempf
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? William Herrin
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/23 RE: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Marcus Brunner
• 2008/06/23 Re: [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Lixia Zhang
• 2008/06/21 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Peter Sherbin
• 2008/06/21 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space HeinerHummel
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Conceptual vs. specific - another discussion list? Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/20 [RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG? Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Eliot Lear
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space David Williamson
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/20 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Dan Jen
• 2008/06/20 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Tony Li
• 2008/06/20 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Tony Li
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Eliot Lear
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Scott Brim
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Eliot Lear
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Scott Brim
• 2008/06/20 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
• 2008/06/19 RE: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Tony Li
• 2008/06/19 [RRG] What does "architectural" mean? Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/19 [RRG] 3 potential consensus questions Robin Whittle
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? David R Oran
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... William Herrin
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space William Herrin
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... David Conrad
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Noel Chiappa
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Moving forward... Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on? Brian E Carpenter
• 2008/06/19 Re: [RRG] Consensus? End-user networks need their own portable address space Brian E Carpenter

• Earlier messages
• Later messages