Thank you both!

Matthias Koeppe schrieb am Donnerstag, 15. September 2022 um 18:17:11 UTC+2:

> On Wednesday, September 14, 2022 at 11:40:12 PM UTC-7 seb....@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
>> What is the proposed workflow to merge the develop branch after a new 
>> release into PR (or other) branches of your fork (i.e re-basing)? Obviously 
>> this is possible by pushing on sync in the web interface or typing gh 
>> repo sync USERNAME/sage -b branch in the command line. But how do you 
>> resolve conflicts?
>>
> Like Dima explained, all of the PR syncing is just additional convenience. 
> You can continue to just do all merging on your computer using the very 
> same git commands and just push the updated branch to your repo. It will 
> then be automatically reflected in the PR.
>  
>
>> If a PR is linked to the Issue, you can alternatively comment on the PR.
>>
>> It sounds like wasting time by searching for comments. Can’t we define a 
>> preference here? This seems to be a part of the decentralized structure 
>> that Travis is criticizing.
>>
> In actual practice, this is a non-problem, it is obvious where a comment 
> should go. 
> And in fact, also on Trac we often have overlapping discussions in related 
> tickets, and Sage developers have been able to navigate this quite well.
> But yes, we can provide explicit guidance to Sage developers. I've added a 
> few bits to 
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/migration-from-trac-to-Git**b in 
> this direction. Help is welcome in expanding this.
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/97302f85-b937-4859-815d-85092eb3596fn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to