Re: 答复: cvsup failed
On Jan 18, 2007, at 10:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server, like this: Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused ... i have change many cvsup server , all of then result in then same, what should i do? I don't know what servers you tried, but you might try the servers listed in the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ cvsup.html#HANDBOOK-MIRRORS-CHAPTER-SGML-MIRRORS-CN-CVSUP If those also result in the connection refused you should post your supfile to provide a little more information. --Guido On Jan 19, 2007, at 3:14 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i have try several servers , such as cvsup.tw.freebsd.org, cvsup.freebsdchina.org , cvsup.jp.freebsd.org, cvsup.freebsd.org, etc. all of then can normaly ping. As far as I can see there no problem with the supfile. I'm not sure if you checked the other reply: Check that your firewall is allowing outgoing tcp/5999. written by: Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This also might be the problem. --guido this is my ports-supfile: # $FreeBSD: src/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile,v 1.33 2004/12/19 02:31:45 brueffer Exp $ # # This file contains all of the "CVSup collections" that make up the # FreeBSD-current ports collection. # # Defaults that apply to all the collections # # IMPORTANT: Change the next line to use one of the CVSup mirror sites # listed at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mirrors.html. #*default host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org *default host=cvsup.FreeBSDChina.org #*default host=cvsup3.FreeBSDChina.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix # If you seem to be limited by CPU rather than network or disk bandwidth, try # commenting out the following line. (Normally, today's CPUs are fast enough # that you want to run compression.) *default compress ## Ports Collection. # # The easiest way to get the ports tree is to use the "ports-all" # mega-collection. It includes all of the individual "ports-*" # collections, #ports-all # These are the individual collections that make up "ports-all". If you # use these, be sure to comment out "ports-all" above. # # Be sure to ALWAYS cvsup the ports-base collection if you use any of the # other individual collections below. ports-base is a mandatory collection # for the ports collection, and your ports may not build correctly if it # is not kept up to date. ports-base ports-accessibility ports-arabic ports-archivers ports-astro #ports-audio ports-benchmarks ports-biology #ports-cad ports-chinese ports-comms ports-converters ports-databases ports-deskutils ports-devel ports-dns ports-editors #ports-emulators #ports-finance #ports-french ports-ftp #ports-games #ports-german ports-graphics ports-hebrew ports-hungarian ports-irc #ports-japanese ports-java #ports-korean ports-lang ports-mail ports-math ports-mbone ports-misc ports-multimedia ports-net ports-net-mgmt ports-news #ports-palm ports-polish #ports-portuguese #ports-print #ports-russian ports-science ports-security ports-shells ports-sysutils ports-textproc ports-ukrainian ports-vietnamese ports-www ports-x11 ports-x11-clocks ports-x11-fm ports-x11-fonts ports-x11-servers ports-x11-themes ports-x11-toolkits ports-x11-wm is there any error in my ports-supfile? Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
- Original Message - From: "Jay Chandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "freebsd-questions" Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 5:33 PM Subject: Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term) > > > > > > Have any of these disclaimers ever proven to be even the slightest bit > legally enforceable? > No they are not. You cannot enforce something when you do not have the recipient make an informed commitment to it. For example, you can hold a gun to someone's head and make them sign a contract. The second you walk away they take the contract to a court and bam, it's invalidated because they signed under duress. And if you look at recent court decisions, the definition of signing under duress has been -exceedingly- stretched these days. Nowadays if someone can convince a court that the contract holder ddn't completely inform them of every last little condition, they can invalidate the contract. And this is a signed, notarized, witnessed contract we are talking about. The idea that something like these disclaimers, or for that matter, software shrink wrap licenses, would hold any legal water is just preposterous. > I mean, for God's sake, they're at the bottom of the message, > essentially telling you not to read the message you just read. > It would make no difference where they were in the message. The people insisting on these disclaimers have absolutely no legal knowledge whatsoever. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD challenged by Internet
- Original Message - From: "RW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:43 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD challenged by Internet > On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:43:02 -0800 > "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Also, these companies simply > > cannot afford to put their best programming and design > > talent on solving things like slow DNS resolver queries > > through their proxy, when these problems are reported. > > The OP said that there was no problem with linux and windows, and > that's consistent with what I saw on my d-link ADSL router. Presumably > FreeBSD is doing something slightly different. Yes, it is, it's making IPv6 DNS queries. There's a long story to this that started a couple years ago when the roots inserted (against a number of people's recommendations) records Things are fine if a downstream nameserver only speaks ipv4. The problem is the newer versions of bind have been coming with IPv6 transition support. If they are run on hosts that have IPv6 support that are connected to IPv4 networks, your supposed to run named with the -4 option. Unfortunately this isn't widely known. As a result when a resolver like FreeBSD's that is IPv6 compliant makes a DNS lookup it will often make a IPv6 lookup, and this trashes the DNS caches in these little routers. If you recompile the kernel with INET6 removed from the config I think it will fix the problem. Not an obvious or easy solution for a lot of people. Or you can contact all the hosts you lookup and tell them to have the admins check their nameservers. ;-) > I wouldn't have expected > these things to be tested against *BSD, but you would think that OS-X > would behave like FreeBSD. > Well, Windows Vista will probably do this too so a lot more folks are going to piss and moan I think before too long. > > > Yet, do the customers that actually have these devices, > > after going through 2 or 3 of them in that many years, > > actually stop one day and say "Gee, I'm really stupid > > to keep urinating my money away on these cheezy > > little routers when I could spend $600 on a nice new > > Cisco 800 series and get expert Cisco support on it, and > > it would work and I could then just forget about it" > > Draytek is a useful halfway house for domestic and soho use - I've > never heard anyone have a bad word to say about their wired > dsl-routers. Cisco is overkill for most people. > There's others. Your local ISP will have their favorites. > > config your DSL modem out of routing mode and into bridging > > mode. > > That's doesn't really buy you all that much, cheap hardware isn't > going to be more reliable in bridged-mode. DNS proxy problems are > not a big deal since it's easy to manually configure servers, or turn-on > recursive lookups. It does eliminate the problems that some > NAT routers have with large numbers of simultaneous connections though. > > These problems is particularly acute in countries where PPPoA is the > norm. FreeBSD has no significant support for usb or pci PPPoA modems, > that leaves us with routers, half-bridge modems, and full-bridging > (where the ISP supports PPPoE over atm). And these bridged modems are > really just adapted nat-routers. Not true. For example the Westell 36R 516 series are true bridges. They are DMT devices and have worked on every DMT ADSL line I've tried. Of course, you have to firmware update them (not obvious) and configure the vpi/vci in them (also not obvious, and requires windows 98 and their program to do it) And they are cheap as dirt on Ebay. And the other thing is that just about all the DSL setups I've seen in bridging mode do the PPPoE/PPPoA conversion automagically. You plug in your PC to the modem, send it PPPoE frames, the modem encapsulates the PPPoE frames in PPPoA packets, sends them out to the DSLAM, the DSLAM strips off the PPPoA header and forwards the PPPoE packets onward to the BRAS/LNS (the PPP server) at the ISP. If you have an internal PPPoA card, all that happens is when the recieving DSLAM gets the "pure" PPPoA frames from your DSL modem over the DSL line, it adds a PPPoE header before sending it onwards (over ethernet) to the BRAS/LNS (the PPP server) So the ISP's PPP server sees PPPoE in either case. > I do envy Linux's support for pci > PPPoA modems. > If they are implemented like winmodems where most of the work is offloaded to the CPU then you should be thankful FreeBSD doesen't support them. I think there's a lot of confusion out there over this PPPoE/PPPoA thing. ADSL is a layer 1 protocol. ATM runs over ADSL as a layer 2 protocol (as is Ethernet) PPP is a layer 3 protocol. PPPoA is PPP over an ATM network. PPPoE is PPP over an Ethernet network. When you do PPPoE over a DSL network it's effectively PPPoEoA. > > > Anyway, I think you should have availed yourself of your ISP's > > tech support department first. And if your ISP's support > > department stinks - some unfortunately do - th
no data from USB mouse
I am having no success at all in getting a Microsoft Optical Wireless Desktop Pro mouse to work in FreeBSD 6.2-RC2. The kernel sees it as: ums0: Microsoft Microsoft Wireless Optical Desktop ums0: 5 buttons and Z dir and a TILT dir. cat /dev/usm0 gives no data, no matter what buttons are pushed on the mouse. After looking online, I saw a few things to try, the first of which to recompile the kernel with USB_dEBUG option enabled. After doing this, and cranking hw.usb.usm.debug up to 10, I still can get nothing out of the usm0, however, typing cat /dev/usm0 and then hitting ^C gives this following message: (note the system has been rebooted with a second wired mouse attached at usm0, so the offending device has moved to usm1 ) ums_intr: sc=0xc50bf000 status=6 ums_intr: data = 00 00 00 00 00 00 The relevant portion of usbdevs -dv is: Controller /dev/usb2: addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), Intel(0x) , rev 1.00 uhub2 port 1 addr 2: low speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Microsoft Wireless Optical De sktop® 1.00(0x008a), Microsoft(0x045e), rev 73.73 ukbd0 ums1 I have verified that this mouse does work in windows, but have no idea what is going on. Please give me some pointers on anything else I can try. Should this be asked on freebsd-usb? Thanks, Andrew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Transport Mode IPSEC
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:07 AM Subject: Re: Transport Mode IPSEC > On 1/18/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:25 AM > > Subject: Re: Transport Mode IPSEC > > > > > > > On 1/18/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dan, > > > > > > > > You do realize, don't you, that since both of these hosts are on a > > switch, > > > > and are using unicast traffic to communicate with each other, that they > > > > cannot be sniffed, don't you? > > > > > > > > You might read up on ethernet switching technology a bit before > > > > answering that. > > > > > > I'm sorry to be the one to make this remark but it's > > > you who needs to read a bit to learn (a) how to sniff > > > traffic off most Ethernet switches from D-Link to > > > Cisco; (b) what other security risks unprotected NFSv3 > > > shares pose. > > > > Yeah, sure I've heard that one before. > > > > Why don't you go ahead and elaborate one of your favorite > > theoretical attacks out of one of those books that "proves" > > that an attacker can "sniff most switches" so I can have the > > fun of knocking it down by real-world hardware implementations > > that you can actually buy and use right now. > > > > Don't be a fool. Ethernet switch manufacturers aren't stupid and > > have read the same stuff your citing. They combat them 2 ways. > > The first is used on the expensive switches and it's called filtering > > and allows switch manufacturer salespeople to have something to > > dog and pony. The second is used on the cheapo switches and > > it's called using a wussy CPU on the switch so that the second > > you try attacking the switch with one of your fancy attacks to > > sniff it, the switch just rolls over and dies, passing so few packets > > that every connection through it looses tremendous numbers of > > packets, and hell breaks loose as all users start screaming. > > > > been there, done that. Those work just dandy in the lab and > > in your CCIE class with 3 hosts setup for the purpose of > > demonstrating the attacks. But try it on a production network some > > day and the side-effects will kill you. > > Okay, I'm sorry to have sounded a bit rough before > I even parsed your name :-) You don't need to throw > bits of your knowledge at unsuspecting bystanders, > too. ;) > OK, truce then. :-) > Most attacks I can imagine, I read/heard about or > seen in the worst of my nightmares - I wouldn't be > able to reproduce or describe in detail. Actually they sound a lot more interesting than they are in practice. There are two general ethernet attacks out there. The first is a MAC-based, you impersonate someone's MAC and IP address (preferably a machine that happens to be switched off at the moment) to get some sort of elevated privilege on a server somewhere, or you do it while the other machine is online, in order to take it offline, or do it to the gateway in order to disrupt internet access, (usually) Quite a lot of fun things can be done with MAC and IP spoofing, and there was a lot of this in early university campus dorm networks when they were first setup. Schools screamed about it and switch vendors responded with intelligent switches that blurred the distinction between layer 1, 2 and 3 and the rule of thumb nowadays is to deploy those in networks where you have potential attackers. The best switches can notify the admin when someone is pulling one of these stunts and the admin can program in advance port lockdowns and such, so that the wanna-be college freshman that thinks he's smart gets a visit from campus security when he pulls this kind of thing. The second are in the high-speed rate family. You send out a lot of itty-bitty packets at a high rate of speed. One trick is to vary the MAC address on each packet so you overflow the switch internal mac tables and cause the switch to basically become a big hub - when that happens you run your sniffer and try to steal passwords, etc. Once more, the aforementiond intelligent switches are the way to deal with this. Both of these attacks depend on the attacker being on the local LAN, or a machine he has compromised being on the local LAN. It is, of course, true that there's a lot of cheap switches on the market and there are corporations that deploy them. However your dealing with an environment here where if an attacker gains control of a machine on the inside, he can get far more useful data from inserting a keystroke logger into the compromised operating system than bothering with running LAN attacks. Or, t
freeBSD installation on intel xeon server SR2500ALBRP model
Hello, Plaese can u inform me that FreeBSD is compatible over intel xeon server with model no SR2500ALBRP. Thanks Naveeed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
On 1/19/07, Jay Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have any of these disclaimers ever proven to be even the slightest bit legally enforceable? I mean, for God's sake, they're at the bottom of the message, essentially telling you not to read the message you just read. [...] They *assume* that you will start reading the email "bottom-up", as my experience says such "disclaimers" are added in those corporations where "top-posting" is a norm. :-) Cheers, Amarendra ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ra0
The hardware was donated. So I don't know exactly what it is. I found this in dmesg ar0: 58644MB status: READY Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 10:40:27 UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (803.02-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x686 Stepping = 6 Features=0x383f9ffMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE> real memory = 268353536 (255 MB) avail memory = 253063168 (241 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xe408-0xe40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe700-0xe7ff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xb800-0xb80f at device 4.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xb400-0xb41f irq 3 at device 4.2 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 4.3 (no driver attached) atapci1: port 0xb000-0xb007,0xa800-0xa803,0xa400-0xa407,0xa000-0xa003,0x9800-0x983f mem 0xe400-0xe401 irq 10 at device 7.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 atapci2: port 0x9400-0x9407,0x9000-0x9003,0x8800-0x8807,0x8400-0x8403,0x8000-0x800f mem 0xe380-0xe3803fff irq 4 at device 10.0 on pci0 ata4: on atapci2 ata5: on atapci2 xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x7800-0x787f mem 0xe300-0xe37f irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 miibus0: on xl0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:01:03:2c:70:ed pci0: at device 12.0 (no driver attached) fdc0: port 0x3f2-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc-0xc97ff,0xcc000-0xc, 0xd-0xd3fff,0xd4000-0xd67ff,0xd8000-0xd87ff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 uhub1: ALCOR Generic USB Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/11.00, addr 3, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 803015461 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: DVDROM at ata0-master UDMA33 ad8: 58644MB at ata4-master UDMA100 ad10: 58644MB at ata5-master UDMA100 ar0: 58644MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad8 at ata4-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad10 at ata5-master Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1a stray irq7 xl0: link state changed to UP stray irq7 stray irq7 stray irq7 too many stray irq 7's: not logging anymore Sincerely, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jan 18, 2007, at 8:33 PM, Daniel Marsh wrote: On 1/19/07, Joshua Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have two drives connected to a PCI ATA100 card. When I went to install FreeBSD I see three drives. ad10, ad8 and ar0. I am guessing this is some kind of Raid so used FreeBSD's auto config option for that drive and installed it on that one drive. Did I just install a Raid 1 config? I guess my question is what exactly did I just do? Does your motherboard have onboard raid, or are you plugged into a raid card at all? If so, does your raid controller automatically create a raid device based on the hard drives connected? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
On 1/18/07, Questions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Let me preface this mail by saying: I'm an idiot. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, you don't have to say it! I have a piece of networking equipment that does not have a "factory defaults" button on it. it has to be RMA'd and returned to the manufacturer if you can't remember login credentials (forgot username,pass/IP, etc) I was assigning the unit an IP address of 172.20.1.x but I typod it. 127.20.1.x and as you can guess, I can't connect to the unit from any other device now. 127.x is loopback. I have tried assigning a 127.20.1.x address to an ethernet interface in a FreeBSD box, and removinging the 127.0.0.1/8 on localhost. I've also gone into the routing table, and removed all traces of routes for 127.x and finally, *tried* creating a route for 127.20.1.x to go out the ethernet interface (link #2) The problem with everything above is: no matter what ip/subnet combination I use, I get a message (when adding the route) that the network is unreachable. Then, when I try to ping the device from the fbsd box, I get "ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address" My question is: Is it possible in any way, to change the 127 routing to pass out my ethernet card long enough to re-ip this device? I haven't yet come up with a decent solution. Thanks for any thoughts, Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" What's the piece of equipment? Is there a serial(comm) port ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD challenged by Internet
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Hi Bob, > > As I am ad administrator of an ISP that is a DSL > ISP that offers DSL, and also runs FreeBSD on it's > servers, I am going to address your point. > > The problem your having is present on MANY of > these "some box(s) which connects me to to net" > Generally, it's older Linksys and Netgear routers that > are the worst offenders. The newer devices don't > generally have this problem - the manufacturers aren't > completely stupid, and do learn from their mistakes - > bot not always. I'm still seeing stupid crap like this in > even the latest boxes. > > Now, here's where I'm going to take you somewhat to > task. You have to understand some things about marketing > these boxes. > > When a company like Airlink101 produces a > "cable/DSL" ethernet router and sells it for $30, > or a company like 2 Wire, or Westell, or ActionTec, > produces a DSL modem/router combo that sells > for $60, it is absolutely impossible for them to make > a profit doing this unless they configure their support > offering so that the quality of technical support you > get is on the level of that which would be provided by > your average 6 year old. Also, these companies simply > cannot afford to put their best programming and design > talent on solving things like slow DNS resolver queries > through their proxy, when these problems are reported. > > Instead when they get these problems, they spend the > R&D money and talent they have building next year's > model - which is then sold for another $30, next year. > > Slow DNS queries are just one of the problems on a > very long, long, long laundry list of problems with these > small cheapo routers. > > Yet, do the customers that actually have these devices, > after going through 2 or 3 of them in that many years, > actually stop one day and say "Gee, I'm really stupid > to keep urinating my money away on these cheezy > little routers when I could spend $600 on a nice new > Cisco 800 series and get expert Cisco support on it, and > it would work and I could then just forget about it" > > Of course not. So, who do you think ends up picking > up the slack? I'll tell you, it's us ISP's that's who. > > If you were our DSL customer and you called in with > this problem, we would have known immediately what > it was, and instructed you in how to correct the configuration. > In your case the absolute best way is to ditch your > router and turn on pppoe on your BSD box and config > your DSL modem out of routing mode and into bridging > mode. Or your cable modem, or whatever. > > You wouldn't get that as a response if you were running > Windows - since Windows attracts security crackers like > dog shit attracts flies - but any UNIX - be it Linux, MacOS X > or whatever, you would get that response. > > Anyway, I think you should have availed yourself of your ISP's > tech support department first. And if your ISP's support > department stinks - some unfortunately do - then drop service > and get a better one. There's plenty more ISP's in the > phone book. > > Ted > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob McIsaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:32 PM > Subject: FreeBSD challenged by Internet > > > >> Hi: >> >> This is not exactly a question rather it is wrapup for a >> series of questions. I had a tricky, confusing problem >> getting FreeBSD on the net but I was able to solve it >> with help from this list.. Ian Smith in particular. >> >> blah,blah. >> Hi Ted: Thanks for your thoughtful reply. My ISP has or used to have some kind of optical modem in the basement. There was a direct RJ45 LAN cable from there to my condo. Two years ago they provided a Cayman 3300 Broadband Gateway modem for my computer jack. So they probably swapped other equipment between me and the 'net. But this setup worked the same with Linux and old win98. But FreeBSD was not pleased with this setup. Perhaps it was ISP hardware, ISP configuration, or some error within BSD. But I cannot determine root cause. I just know that BSD does not accept a private IP as being from a nameserver. So DNS requests must be routed to an actual nameserver. And that requires altering the DHCP lease in my case. My setup works but it is still outputting IPv6 packets. The logic expressed within /etc says that IPv6 is disabled by default. Another mystery. Cheers, -Bob- PS: You top-poster... how did you get away with it? :-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
no pv entries: increase vm.pmap.shpgperproc
Hi, My freebsd box runs the apache httpd2.0 server, postgresql8.1server, Recently, I got the below info in /var/crash. “Dump header from device /dev/da0s1b Architecture: i386 Architecture Version: 2 Dump Length: 1073127424B (1023 MB) Blocksize: 512 Dumptime: Wed Jan 17 16:39:08 2007 Hostname: myhost.mydomain.com Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump Version String: FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Apr 25 15:07:33 CST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MYKNL Panic String: no pv entries: increase vm.pmap.shpgperproc Dump Parity: 2383301964 Bounds: 49 Dump Status: good” I had searched in google, but I didn’t know how to do. Are there any suggestions? Thanks, peter___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
jboss powering down my machine?
when i try to launch jboss thru eclipse on my bsd 6.2 machine, it gets about half way thru and then the machine powers down. as i understood bsd, it was not possible for that to happen. is there a log somewhere that i can look at to try to figure this out? i can't find anything very useful on my own. thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ra0
On 1/19/07, Joshua Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have two drives connected to a PCI ATA100 card. When I went to install FreeBSD I see three drives. ad10, ad8 and ar0. I am guessing this is some kind of Raid so used FreeBSD's auto config option for that drive and installed it on that one drive. Did I just install a Raid 1 config? I guess my question is what exactly did I just do? Does your motherboard have onboard raid, or are you plugged into a raid card at all? If so, does your raid controller automatically create a raid device based on the hard drives connected? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dummynet howto?
Hey all, In dummynet, what's an appropriate queue size for a 50 Megabit pipe? And is there a general rule-of-thumb or calcluation I should be doing (i.e. limitation size times some number or something?) -Dan -- "Hitler, Satan, those Hanson kids, anything. Just not the curious anteater." -Peter Scolari, as Wayne Szalinki in "Honey, I Shrunk The Kids--The Series" Dan Mahoney Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[OT] mail disclaimers [ was Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term) ]
> > [ snip much ado about mail etiquette and sigs and whatnot ] > > > > I started using the lists from work years ago when I was > > establishing the FreeBSD servers and it was easier to get > > Q&A stuff done... Since then the weenies have come along > > and changed out a perfectly servicable Postfix / Cyrus > > mail system with M$ Exchg(barf), and the beanies wanted the > > disclaimers .. > > > > Have any of these disclaimers ever proven to be even the slightest bit > legally enforceable? > > I mean, for God's sake, they're at the bottom of the message, > essentially telling you not to read the message you just read. Probably just as enforceable as the shrink-wrap licence on Windows. (By using this CD, you agree to be bound by the EULA which you will get a chance to review when installing the software...) -- Matt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
Murray Taylor wrote: -Original Message- From: Greg Albrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 11:42 AM To: Murray Taylor Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term) On 18/01/07, Murray Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Top posting" is only one issue. Others of great importance are trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny fragments, and not writing one-line paragraphs. Your .sig is a good example of things that people should remove from replies. Greg Exactly! And not only my .sig which I do have control over whether I add it or not, and also the [EMAIL PROTECTED] stupid corporate disclaimer also (over which I have no control) sigh mjt (no .sig) since i seem to be in the mood to muddy the waters today: have you considered using a mail address outside of your corporation? one which doesn't automatically add that disclaimer. i've never been fond of using my work email address for anything outside of work, but that's me. maybe this is an obvious answer but it is one way to please the etiquette overlords. -g -- Greg Albrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I started using the lists from work years ago when I was establishing the FreeBSD servers and it was easier to get Q&A stuff done... Since then the weenies have come along and changed out a perfectly servicable Postfix / Cyrus mail system with M$ Exchg(barf), and the beanies wanted the disclaimers .. sigh Have any of these disclaimers ever proven to be even the slightest bit legally enforceable? I mean, for God's sake, they're at the bottom of the message, essentially telling you not to read the message you just read. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today's Excuse: PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ra0
I have two drives connected to a PCI ATA100 card. When I went to install FreeBSD I see three drives. ad10, ad8 and ar0. I am guessing this is some kind of Raid so used FreeBSD's auto config option for that drive and installed it on that one drive. Did I just install a Raid 1 config? I guess my question is what exactly did I just do? Sincerely, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Albrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 11:42 AM > To: Murray Taylor > Cc: freebsd-questions > Subject: Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term) > > On 18/01/07, Murray Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > "Top posting" is only one issue. Others of great importance are > > > trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny > fragments, and > > > not writing one-line paragraphs. Your .sig is a good example of > > > things that people should remove from replies. > > > > > > Greg > > > > Exactly! And not only my .sig which I do have control over whether > > I add it or not, and also the [EMAIL PROTECTED] stupid corporate > disclaimer also > > (over which I have no control) sigh > > > > mjt (no .sig) > > since i seem to be in the mood to muddy the waters today: > > have you considered using a mail address outside of your corporation? > one which doesn't automatically add that disclaimer. i've never been > fond of using my work email address for anything outside of work, but > that's me. maybe this is an obvious answer but it is one way to please > the etiquette overlords. > > -g > > -- > Greg Albrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I started using the lists from work years ago when I was establishing the FreeBSD servers and it was easier to get Q&A stuff done... Since then the weenies have come along and changed out a perfectly servicable Postfix / Cyrus mail system with M$ Exchg(barf), and the beanies wanted the disclaimers .. sigh mjt ( .sig applies here ];-0 ) -- "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein -- --- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
On 18/01/07, Murray Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Top posting" is only one issue. Others of great importance are > trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny fragments, and > not writing one-line paragraphs. Your .sig is a good example of > things that people should remove from replies. > > Greg Exactly! And not only my .sig which I do have control over whether I add it or not, and also the [EMAIL PROTECTED] stupid corporate disclaimer also (over which I have no control) sigh mjt (no .sig) since i seem to be in the mood to muddy the waters today: have you considered using a mail address outside of your corporation? one which doesn't automatically add that disclaimer. i've never been fond of using my work email address for anything outside of work, but that's me. maybe this is an obvious answer but it is one way to please the etiquette overlords. -g -- Greg Albrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Flash 9
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:37:10 +0600 Bachilo Dmitry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't you guys know? There would not be any sound, because linux flash 9 uses > ALSA, not OSS. If there would be some wrapper sometime, we will hear the > flash, if there would not be such thing, we would not. > No I didn't know that :-) Well I am going back to version 7, works perfectly with Opera even on sites that demand version 8. Best regards, Rico ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Daylight savings time / 6.1 and 4.11
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josef Grosch > Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 10:59 AM > To: hal > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Daylight savings time / 6.1 and 4.11 > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:31:22PM -0700, hal wrote: > > This came down from above?! > > > > Beginning in 2007, Daylight Savings Time will be lengthened > one month > > by starting three weeks earlier (2AM on the second Sunday > in March) > > and ending one week later (2AM on the first Sunday in November). > > > > > > What patch levels do I need to be at for my 4.7 and 6.1 > systems to be > > daylight savings 2007 ready? > > > > Currently: 4.11-RELEASE-p25 > > > > Currently: 6.1-RELEASE-p10 > > > > hal > > > This is an issue here at work. We have very many FreeBSD 4.x > machines and a > growing number of FreeBSD 6.x. The change when daylight > saving time starts > and ends is an issue for machines in the United States and, we think, > those in Canada. The way to check if your zone file is > correct is to do > > zdump -v /etc/localtime | more > > Look for the following > > > /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 > 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 > /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 > 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 > /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 > 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 > /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 > 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 > > If you see this, your zone file will handle the change > correctly. The 6.x > series has the corrected zone files. 4.x does not have this. > The best way > to handle this is to copy the zone file from > /usr/share/zoneinfo on a 6.x > machine to your 4.x. > > > Josef > port misc/zoneinfo runs on all os versions, fixes all zone files caveat: current ports tree caveat: only works if the DST change has been added to the NIST master files mjt --- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
> -Original Message- > From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 10:13 AM > To: Murray Taylor > Cc: Dak Ghatikachalam; freebsd-questions > Subject: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term) > > [heavily trimmed, subject line clarified, format breakage recovered] > > On Thursday, 18 January 2007 at 16:31:41 +1100, Murray Taylor wrote: > > On Thursday, 18 January 2007 11:48 AM, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: > >> What if someone is emailing from a thread while I am replying at > >> the same time, would that not happen ? Would I be getting complains > >> again that I am "top-posting" > > > > Top-posting defined simply ... > > > > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > A: Top-posting. > > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > > Yes, that's a nice one. > > > Unfortunately all Micro$lop 'standard' email clients and a few > > others put the cursor at the top of the email, so the bad habit has > > developed across the world both domestically and in businesses, to > > write there, rather than continuing the email thread at the bottom. > > I think the biggest problem with Microsoft MUAs is not where they > position the cursor, but the difficulty they cause in editing the > text. My editor also positions the cursor at the very top when I > reply to a message. But it also makes it possible to tidy things up. > > "Top posting" is only one issue. Others of great importance are > trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny fragments, and > not writing one-line paragraphs. Your .sig is a good example of > things that people should remove from replies. > > Greg > -- Exactly! And not only my .sig which I do have control over whether I add it or not, and also the [EMAIL PROTECTED] stupid corporate disclaimer also (over which I have no control) sigh Mail etiquette and general netiquette are subjects that are not taught when the unwashed are given computers... mjt (no .sig) --- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 03:24:44PM -0800, Greg Albrecht wrote: > On 18/01/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"Top posting" is only one issue. Others of great importance are > >trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny fragments, and > >not writing one-line paragraphs. Your .sig is a good example of > >things that people should remove from replies. > > i've been wanting to chime in on this. perhaps it should be taken into > consideration that a good number of MODERN email clients support > automatic threading of messages. this allows me to see each reply to a > message after the original message, in succession. i understand that > different people configure and use their email clients in different > ways, but why is there such a pandering towards one versus the other. > my email software (gmail right now but has been mutt and thunderbird > in the past) makes it really easy for me to get the context of a > message as soon as it arrives. perhaps it's time for the rest of the > world to step up and add auto-threading to their mta's? Just a nitpick: wouldn't it be the MUA's job? Also, threading in the MUA isn't perfect because sometimes the headers are munged and the threading gets broken. The MUA can try to correct this, though it may well be unable to. Gmail, itself, appears susceptible--haven't you ever seen singleton messages that are clearly part of a mail thread? > ps: there's no need to reiterate how 'hard' it is for you to have to > 'scroll down' to read the original message in a reply, how is that any > different than me having to scroll down to read your reply? Two points here: 1) Inconsistent top/bottom posting within the same thread is a pain for everyone to read through. This almost demands that consistency be maintained, and that consistency must be determined by the community. This community generally prefers bottom-posting. which leads to: 2) As an outsider coming into a new group, it's generally considered nice to follow that group's conventions, /especially/ when it's not particularly hard to do so. While you're right that scrolling to read the original is not difficult, if the majority of people on the list (including the list admins) prefer bottom-posting, it would seem appropriate to change your own behavior rather than to expect everyone else to change theirs. Etiquette is generally just a way of showing respect for other people while interacting with them. It's not required, and it's not always easy (certainly it's harder than just doing whatever we want) but in general, I think the world is a nicer place when everyone is respectful of other people's (and their community's) wishes, as long as the wishes aren't too onerous. Erik ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Daylight savings time / 6.1 and 4.11
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 01:31:22PM -0700, hal wrote: > This came down from above?! > > Beginning in 2007, Daylight Savings Time will be lengthened one month > by starting three weeks earlier (2AM on the second Sunday in March) > and ending one week later (2AM on the first Sunday in November). > > > What patch levels do I need to be at for my 4.7 and 6.1 systems to be > daylight savings 2007 ready? > > Currently: 4.11-RELEASE-p25 > > Currently: 6.1-RELEASE-p10 > > hal This is an issue here at work. We have very many FreeBSD 4.x machines and a growing number of FreeBSD 6.x. The change when daylight saving time starts and ends is an issue for machines in the United States and, we think, those in Canada. The way to check if your zone file is correct is to do zdump -v /etc/localtime | more Look for the following /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 09:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 01:59:59 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 11 10:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Mar 11 03:00:00 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 08:59:59 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:59:59 2007 PDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-25200 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 4 09:00:00 2007 UTC = Sun Nov 4 01:00:00 2007 PST isdst=0 gmtoff=-28800 If you see this, your zone file will handle the change correctly. The 6.x series has the corrected zone files. 4.x does not have this. The best way to handle this is to copy the zone file from /usr/share/zoneinfo on a 6.x machine to your 4.x. Josef -- FreeBSD 6.2 | Supreme executive power derives from a mandate Josef Grosch| from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ceremony. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Portupgrade error
Got it sorted-- thanks for all who helped. --Jay ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Multi Boot Installtion FreeBSd+Fedora+Debian
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:52:22 +0530 Anuj Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now with the FreeBSD 6.1 installation cd , Installations stops after > detecting my hard disk. I unplugged my 2nd IDE (with data) as it > sometimes it shows me data read error thinking it may causing problem. > Still the problem is same, i can not proceed beyond the detection of my > first IDE detection. Hi Anuj, what does exactly happen? what part of the installation process ? If you are already in the ncurses interface, you can switch to another VT (Alt-F2 throught to F4 at least should work ), where far more detailed information about the installation process is shown. I think Alt-F2 should give you a console where you can issue some commands to see what's going on. Best, _ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause." Dostoevsky I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Does Firefox run on the SPARC64 port of FreeBSD?
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:59:17PM +0100, Christian Baer wrote: > Michael Johnson wrote: > > > Firefox only runs on >= 601101 sparc64. > > I am guessing that means a special revision of the UltraSPARC II processor, > but I don't really know, because google gets a lot of hits, mainly > explaining all sorts of soft that seems to have the same problem, but none > of these hits really explain the meaning behind this. > > So even though this is getting a little OT: > In English, please! That's a number indicating a version of FreeBSD, see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#AEN5722 Basically, it does not work on 6.1-RELEASE, so you should consider updating to 6.2-RELEASE. Kris pgpJmirFqR5mK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Mail etiquette
On 18/01/07, Peter A. Giessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2007/01/18 14:24, Greg Albrecht seems to have typed: > threading of messages. this allows me to see each reply to a > message after the original message, in succession. i understand that > different people configure and use their email clients in different > ways, but why is there such a pandering towards one versus the other. I think the bigger problem is when a few people do it one way and everyone else does it another way.The consensus on this list has been time after time, "bottom-posting". Nothing is harder to read or interpret who said what than when a couple "top-posts" and everyone else "bottom-posts". Also, as Greg (groggy)'s e-mail demonstrates, "bottom-posting" fits well with the philosophy of answering each question one by one as you flow down the message. e.g.: > Question 1 Answer 1 > Question 2 Answer 2 This is not possible (or not as clear) with "top-posting". excelent point peter. i'm hoping people will catch on to this just as soon as they stop pulling into the crosswalk at a red lights, stop parking too close to my car, stop putting recyclable plastic in the trash, stop throwing their cigarette butts down the storm drain, stop feeding stray cats, stop breaking into cars, stop buying goods produced in sweat shops and most importantly stop voting republican. *crossing my fingers*, -g -- Greg Albrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail etiquette
On 2007/01/18 14:24, Greg Albrecht seems to have typed: > threading of messages. this allows me to see each reply to a > message after the original message, in succession. i understand that > different people configure and use their email clients in different > ways, but why is there such a pandering towards one versus the other. I think the bigger problem is when a few people do it one way and everyone else does it another way.The consensus on this list has been time after time, "bottom-posting". Nothing is harder to read or interpret who said what than when a couple "top-posts" and everyone else "bottom-posts". Also, as Greg (groggy)'s e-mail demonstrates, "bottom-posting" fits well with the philosophy of answering each question one by one as you flow down the message. e.g.: > Question 1 Answer 1 > Question 2 Answer 2 This is not possible (or not as clear) with "top-posting". ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Portupgrade error
George Vanev wrote: Portupgrade is trying to add a group www with gid 80 which already exists. Try "cat /etc/goup | grep 80" (without quotes) to see which group is assigned gid 80. Then you can take measures changing the gid of that group. Regards -- George Vanev What's strange is that 80 is allocated for apache. I've removed that line, and still encounter the same error. Any thoughts? Thanks, incidentally-- this one's kinda hairy. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today's Excuse: PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Portupgrade error
On 1/19/07, Jay Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How do I remove a group so that FreeBSD's ports tree doesn't see it as already allocated? I was upgrading using portupgrade, when Apache errored. Error output below: ---> Build of www/apache22 ended at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:18 -0800 (consumed 00:06:25) ---> Updating dependency info ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-gettext-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-mbstring-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-mhash-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-openssl-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-pcre-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-session-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-xml-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/squirrelmail-1.4.9a/+CONTENTS ---> Uninstallation of apache-2.2.3 started at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:18 -0800 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a package ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version ---> Deinstalling 'apache-2.2.3' ---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so.2 as /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libapr-1.so.2 ---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so.2 as /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libaprutil-1.so.2 pkg_delete: package 'apache-2.2.3' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled (but I'll delete it anyway): php5-5.2.0 ===> If you plan to do not reinstall apache22, you can safely remove /usr/local/etc/apache22. [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 43 packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] ---> Uninstallation of apache-2.2.3 ended at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:46 -0800 (consumed 00:00:27) ---> Installation of www/apache22 started at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:46 -0800 ---> Installing the new version via the port ===> Installing for apache-2.2.4 ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.5 - found ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on shared library: iconv.3 - found pw: gid `80' has already been allocated Adding group "www" failed... *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.70165.20 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=apache-2.2.3 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.2.3 make reinstall ---> Updating dependency info egrep: /var/db/pkg/apache-2.2.3/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory ---> Restoring the old version pw: gid `80' has already been allocated Adding group "www" failed... pkg_add: install script returned error status -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today's Excuse: PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED]" Portupgrade is trying to add a group www with gid 80 which already exists. Try "cat /etc/goup | grep 80" (without quotes) to see which group is assigned gid 80. Then you can take measures changing the gid of that group. Regards -- George Vanev ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
On 18/01/07, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Top-posting defined simply ... > > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > Unfortunately all Micro$lop 'standard' email clients and a few > others put the cursor at the top of the email, so the bad habit has > developed across the world both domestically and in businesses, to > write there, rather than continuing the email thread at the bottom. "Top posting" is only one issue. Others of great importance are trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny fragments, and not writing one-line paragraphs. Your .sig is a good example of things that people should remove from replies. i've been wanting to chime in on this. perhaps it should be taken into consideration that a good number of MODERN email clients support automatic threading of messages. this allows me to see each reply to a message after the original message, in succession. i understand that different people configure and use their email clients in different ways, but why is there such a pandering towards one versus the other. my email software (gmail right now but has been mutt and thunderbird in the past) makes it really easy for me to get the context of a message as soon as it arrives. perhaps it's time for the rest of the world to step up and add auto-threading to their mta's? just my $0.02. -g ps: there's no need to reiterate how 'hard' it is for you to have to 'scroll down' to read the original message in a reply, how is that any different than me having to scroll down to read your reply? -- Greg Albrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) An Indie, Hip Hop and IDM Podcast: The Letter G http://theletterg.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Mail etiquette (was: What is this mean by this term)
[heavily trimmed, subject line clarified, format breakage recovered] On Thursday, 18 January 2007 at 16:31:41 +1100, Murray Taylor wrote: > On Thursday, 18 January 2007 11:48 AM, Dak Ghatikachalam wrote: >> What if someone is emailing from a thread while I am replying at >> the same time, would that not happen ? Would I be getting complains >> again that I am "top-posting" > > Top-posting defined simply ... > > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? Yes, that's a nice one. > Unfortunately all Micro$lop 'standard' email clients and a few > others put the cursor at the top of the email, so the bad habit has > developed across the world both domestically and in businesses, to > write there, rather than continuing the email thread at the bottom. I think the biggest problem with Microsoft MUAs is not where they position the cursor, but the difficulty they cause in editing the text. My editor also positions the cursor at the very top when I reply to a message. But it also makes it possible to tidy things up. "Top posting" is only one issue. Others of great importance are trimming your posts, not breaking the lines into tiny fragments, and not writing one-line paragraphs. Your .sig is a good example of things that people should remove from replies. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgpw5QifRmGZU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Portupgrade error
How do I remove a group so that FreeBSD's ports tree doesn't see it as already allocated? I was upgrading using portupgrade, when Apache errored. Error output below: ---> Build of www/apache22 ended at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:18 -0800 (consumed 00:06:25) ---> Updating dependency info ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-gettext-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-mbstring-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-mhash-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-openssl-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-pcre-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-session-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/php5-xml-5.2.0/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/squirrelmail-1.4.9a/+CONTENTS ---> Uninstallation of apache-2.2.3 started at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:18 -0800 ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a package ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version ---> Deinstalling 'apache-2.2.3' ---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/libapr-1.so.2 as /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libapr-1.so.2 ---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/libaprutil-1.so.2 as /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libaprutil-1.so.2 pkg_delete: package 'apache-2.2.3' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled (but I'll delete it anyway): php5-5.2.0 ===> If you plan to do not reinstall apache22, you can safely remove /usr/local/etc/apache22. [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 43 packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] ---> Uninstallation of apache-2.2.3 ended at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:46 -0800 (consumed 00:00:27) ---> Installation of www/apache22 started at: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:31:46 -0800 ---> Installing the new version via the port ===> Installing for apache-2.2.4 ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.5 - found ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on shared library: expat.6 - found ===> apache-2.2.4 depends on shared library: iconv.3 - found pw: gid `80' has already been allocated Adding group "www" failed... *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/apache22. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.70165.20 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=apache-2.2.3 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.2.3 make reinstall ---> Updating dependency info egrep: /var/db/pkg/apache-2.2.3/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory ---> Restoring the old version pw: gid `80' has already been allocated Adding group "www" failed... pkg_add: install script returned error status -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today's Excuse: PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh public key authentification
On Thursday 18 January 2007 16:44, Christian Baer wrote: > The problem was not the authorized_keys file itself, it was my home > directory. I don't think so. More likely, it was the .ssh directory itself. -- Kirk Strauser pgpXWYQbAuWpq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: disable cntl+alt+del function
Sean Murphy wrote: cntl+alt+del at the console without being logged in reboots the server. The server runs through its shutdown procedure and reboots. How do I disable this function? You could compile the kernel with: options SC_DISABLE_REBOOT ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh public key authentification
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:14:34 -0600 Noel Jones wrote: > Did you copy the displayed "Public key for pasting into OpenSSH" from > PuttyGEN, or did you paste the actual contents of the public key? > Putty's on-disk format for public keys is not compatible with OpenSSH. Yeah, I got that right. sshd wants to have the key in one line, while PuTTY-keygen makes several lines out of them. The problem were the homedir permissions (see other post). Regards Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh public key authentification
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:50:52 -0600 Parker Anderson wrote: > Have you verified the permissions of the authorized_keys file on the > server? If you have permissions set too loose (e.g. unneeded > read/write permission to groups/other users), sshd may be refusing to > trust that file. The directory has mode 700 and the file hast 600. Restricting these any further could result in a problem. :-) > You may wish to give this a read (it mostly just covers those points): > http://www.freebsddiary.org/ssh-authorized-keys.php Ok, I did that. Now it works! :-) The problem was not the authorized_keys file itself, it was my home directory. This had mode 770, which seemed fine to me as it is owned by christian:christian. Making it group-readable shouldn't pose a security problem, as only I will be in this group. However, sshd didn't see it that way, it seems. Now that I changed it to 750, all is fine. :-) Thanks für your help! Good night! Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Munyak > Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 4:20 AM > To: FreeBSD Questions; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fwd: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Bachilo Dmitry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Jan 10, 2007 10:54 PM > Subject: Re: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > We have an employee who spends quite a bit of time on the net and > > currently have no way of analyzing where they go. Are > there any decent > > proxy servers that I can put them on to see where they are going? > > > > -Tom > > I have recently installed Dansguardian + Squid onto 6.1-REALEASE. My > approach was not as an in-line, but rather transparent mode. Our proxy > server is in the DMZ. All outbound http requests from the LAN are > redirected at the firewall to the server in the DMZ. This approach > eliminates users ability to by-pass the proxy, as no changes to > browser settings are made. > > If the proxy dies, all I need to do (temporarily) is disable the > redirector in the firewall. > > So far, this setup works rather well. There are plenty of free tools > for analyzing the logs. The plus for us, by incorporating > Dansguardian, is the ability to further customize what is acceptable > and what's not. > > ~ Don > ___ Add calamaris from the ports and you have a good squid log analyser in the bundle. mjt --- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --- ### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ### ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to install the 3945ABG Driver on a fresh FreeBSD 6.2 install?
On Thursday 18 January 2007 23:15, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 1/18/07, Daniel Tourde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello again, > > Hi Daniel, > > > I built it. It works but it complains and sometimes it shuts down > > itself... > > About the complains, see below.. > What do you mean by it shuts down itself? Does the link goes down? > Does the module unloads? ... > > > That would be nice to know where to report the error messages > > The driver was written by > Damien Bergamini bergaminifree.fr> > > > Jan 18 20:24:55 guenevere kernel: rx tail flags error 702 > > I also see dozens of these messages on my logs, but it doesn't seem to > affect the normal operation of the wireless card. > > > Daniel Hi Could someone please give a link to this driver ? It would save me 30 bucks for a new wireless card :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Multi Boot Installtion FreeBSd+Fedora+Debian
Hello, I had 3 OS installed on 40 GB IDE hard disk, Windows nt+ Debian + Fedora recently I decided to completely remove windows from my pc and install FreeBSD 6.1, 2nd IDE I use for data backup only. I deleted windows partition installed on the primary partition, with the fdisk utility of FreeBSD installation. After saving changes, I rebooted machine to reconfirm, and read manual again, to avoid data loss. Now with the FreeBSD 6.1 installation cd , Installations stops after detecting my hard disk. I unplugged my 2nd IDE (with data) as it sometimes it shows me data read error thinking it may causing problem. Still the problem is same, i can not proceed beyond the detection of my first IDE detection. my partitions: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/hdc: 40.0 GB, 40060403712 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4870 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdc1 383486936041827+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hdc3 2 342 2725632 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hdc5 * 383 395 104359+ 83 Linux /dev/hdc6 396 777 3068383+ 83 Linux /dev/hdc7 7781414 5116671 83 Linux /dev/hdc814151541 1020096 83 Linux /dev/hdc915421605 514048+ 83 Linux /dev/hdc10 16061987 3068383+ 83 Linux /dev/hdc11 19882116 1036161 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hdc12 21172129 104391 83 Linux /dev/hdc13 21302320 1534176 83 Linux /dev/hdc14 23212384 514048+ 83 Linux /dev/hdc15 23853276 7164958+ 83 Linux Partition table entries are not in disk order and [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 22 0 39121488 hdc 22 1 1 hdc1 22 32725632 hdc3 22 5 104359 hdc5 22 63068383 hdc6 22 75116671 hdc7 22 81020096 hdc8 22 9 514048 hdc9 22103068383 hdc10 22111036161 hdc11 2212 104391 hdc12 22131534176 hdc13 2214 514048 hdc14 22157164958 hdc15 22162723616 hdc16 I reinstalled the grub 2 times,, still the problem is same. Thanks and regards anugunj "anuj" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: disable cntl+alt+del function
On 1/18/07, Sean Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: cntl+alt+del at the console without being logged in reboots the server. The server runs through its shutdown procedure and reboots. How do I disable this function? add the line options SC_DISABLE_REBOOT in your kernel config file and rebuild+reinstall it -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: disable cntl+alt+del function
On Thursday 18 January 2007 16:55, Sean Murphy wrote: > cntl+alt+del at the console without being logged in reboots the server. > The server runs through its shutdown procedure and reboots. How do I > disable this function? Add this to your kernel config file: options SC_DISABLE_REBOOT JN ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to install the 3945ABG Driver on a fresh FreeBSD 6.2 install?
On 1/18/07, Daniel Tourde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Pietro, Again... PS: There are many drivers around on the net. That would be nice to indicate where you found that one, coz it seems to work... ;) Figured out, I took it from here: http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/wpi/wpi-freebsd-20061109.tgz -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
disable cntl+alt+del function
cntl+alt+del at the console without being logged in reboots the server. The server runs through its shutdown procedure and reboots. How do I disable this function? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to install the 3945ABG Driver on a fresh FreeBSD 6.2 install?
On 1/18/07, Daniel Tourde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello again, Hi Daniel, I built it. It works but it complains and sometimes it shuts down itself... About the complains, see below.. What do you mean by it shuts down itself? Does the link goes down? Does the module unloads? ... That would be nice to know where to report the error messages The driver was written by Damien Bergamini bergaminifree.fr> Jan 18 20:24:55 guenevere kernel: rx tail flags error 702 I also see dozens of these messages on my logs, but it doesn't seem to affect the normal operation of the wireless card. Daniel -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: DHCP server questions
Darryl Hoar wrote: Thanks Chuck. I do grok that rebooting is only really needed for new kernel installs. Just making network design decisions and want to avoid those "Oh, crap" moments. -Darryl I haven't found too many mutually exclusive services on Unix. In theory, if we did away with redundancy, and got a honkin' HUGE server to handle the load, we could run our entire University on one FreeBSD box (didn't they used to call that a Mainframe?). -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Today's Excuse: PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How-to build / make / install
Thanks, here's the latest attempts I've made... Have you had a look in the ports tree to see if you can find Hobbit there? Yes, no port is available. Otherwise, gmake is available from ports/devel/gmake, just do cd ports/devel/gmake and make install clean and then you've got it. added gmake before hand. # make, then # make install clean gcc and g++ are also installed. Then you do MAKE=gmake ./configure-server or whatever in the source catalog for hobbit. Not sure what the source catalog is?? from /hobbit-4.2.0 folder don-bsd# ./configure Configuration script for Hobbit This script asks a few questions and builds a Makefile to compile Hobbit Checking your make-utility GNU make is required to build Hobbit. If it is available as "gmake", run configure as: 'MAKE=gmake ./configure.server' don-bsd# I can see that this message is from the file "configure.server". Snip of code below. {snip from configure.server file} echo "Checking your make-utility" MAKEVER=`$MAKE -version 2>&1 | head -n 1 | awk '{print $1 " " $2}'` if test "$MAKEVER" != "GNU Make" then echo "GNU make is required to build Hobbit." echo "If it is available as \"gmake\", run configure as: 'MAKE=gmake $0'" exit 1 fi echo "Checking pre-requisites for building Hobbit" echo "" . build/fping.sh echo ""; echo "" . build/rrd.sh echo ""; echo "" . build/pcre.sh echo ""; echo "" {...end-snip} But seems to bail right after the echo "If it is available as \"gmake\"... Thanks Don ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What is this mean by this term
On Thursday 18 January 2007 10:51, Hugo Silva wrote: > Please don't feed the trolls. The weird thing is that I'd personally vouch for jdow not being a troll. I'm not sure where that came from. -- Kirk Strauser pgp1HsMf6qBzQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: DHCP server questions
> -Original Message- > From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: DHCP server questions > > > On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Darryl Hoar wrote: > > I am considering modifying my web/email server by adding DHCP server > > duties to it. Any problems with this idea ? I can reboot the > > server if > > I need to without screwing up the clients that already have IP > > assigned, > > can't I ? > > No, the DHCP server is a rather lightweight daemon and will not add > much load to your current system. And yes, one could reboot the > machine acting as your DHCP server without screwing up the clients > which have already gotten a IP/lease. > > Note that rebooting a Unix system is normally not needed for > anything > short of installing a new kernel... > > -- > -Chuck > Thanks Chuck. I do grok that rebooting is only really needed for new kernel installs. Just making network design decisions and want to avoid those "Oh, crap" moments. -Darryl ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Flash 9
Bachilo Dmitry wrote: В сообщении от Четверг 18 января 2007 09:15 Naim написал(a): On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:17:21 -0500 "Chad Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see it in linux compat layer http://www.freshports.org/www/linux-flashplugin9/ ;) -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED]" Does it work for anyone though? I just installed it and it gets no sound or it freezes depending on the site. I have the same situation, no sound! Best regards, Rico Don't you guys know? There would not be any sound, because linux flash 9 uses ALSA, not OSS. If there would be some wrapper sometime, we will hear the flash, if there would not be such thing, we would not. What would happen if one used the linux-alsa-libs from ports? Would that help with sound? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: DHCP server questions
On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Darryl Hoar wrote: I am considering modifying my web/email server by adding DHCP server duties to it. Any problems with this idea ? I can reboot the server if I need to without screwing up the clients that already have IP assigned, can't I ? No, the DHCP server is a rather lightweight daemon and will not add much load to your current system. And yes, one could reboot the machine acting as your DHCP server without screwing up the clients which have already gotten a IP/lease. Note that rebooting a Unix system is normally not needed for anything short of installing a new kernel... -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sendmail problem
On 2007/01/18 10:56, David Banning seems to have typed: > Since I do not want to run sendmail-sasl from the ports, do I really > need the definitions that you outline above? I ask this because > the errors pop up as a result of my erroneous ports install/deinstall. No, but you need to take steps to prevent an open SMTP relay, otherwise you'll be banned from delivering to any ISP as a spammer. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Incorrect kernel time on laptop boot
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 07:41:49AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Gilbert Cao wrote: > > > > Hi the list, > > > > I currently experienced a problem with my Sony Vaio VGN-FE31B laptop. > > Each time I boot, the kernel time seems to be set with the wrong date time. > > When I poweroff the machine, wait for some minutes and reboot again, the > > kernel time is set with a few seconds after the "wrong" time on shutdown. > > If you're dual-booting with Windows, the cause is that Windows will > set the BIOS to wall-time, while FreeBSD sets the BIOS to UTC. One way > to fix this is to run tzsetup and set FreeBSD to run with wall-time. Well, yes, I have dual boot with Windows, and I know it needs to have BIOS clock set to local time. My FreeBSD is "tzsetup" to local time, no UTC, and it has a /etc/wall_cmos_clock file and "adjkerntz -i" running. At the time I wrote, my laptop still has its date and time set to yesterday evening (local time), and it was powered off the whole day, today. However, if I boot it with a FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT-200610 kernel, its date and time is set correctly. So, I might concluded that something has changed between 200610 and 200611 snapshots. Anyway, I don't know if it can help but here is a result from : $ sysctl kern.timecounter >> kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.mask: 65535 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.counter: 17348 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.frequency: 1193182 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.quality: 0 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.mask: 16777215 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.counter: 15466075 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.frequency: 3579545 kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.quality: 1000 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.mask: 4294967295 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.counter: 886479930 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.frequency: 1662511500 kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.quality: -100 kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0 kern.timecounter.nbinuptime: 1387464 kern.timecounter.nnanouptime: 8 kern.timecounter.nmicrouptime: 74273 kern.timecounter.nbintime: 92905 kern.timecounter.nnanotime: 13 kern.timecounter.nmicrotime: 92892 kern.timecounter.ngetbinuptime: 120493 kern.timecounter.ngetnanouptime: 173 kern.timecounter.ngetmicrouptime: 174462 kern.timecounter.ngetbintime: 0 kern.timecounter.ngetnanotime: 2 kern.timecounter.ngetmicrotime: 330562 kern.timecounter.nsetclock: 3 kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(-100) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0) dummy(-100) kern.timecounter.tick: 1 kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 0 .. and a dmesg output from my laptop: >> Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Jan 14 15:35:13 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VAIO WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5500 @ 1.66GHz (1662.51-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f6 Stepping = 6 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xe39d> AMD Features=0x2010 AMD Features2=0x1 Cores per package: 2 real memory = 1609105408 (1534 MB) avail memory = 1558872064 (1486 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_throttle1: on cpu1 acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT device_attach: acpi_throttle1 attach returned 6 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 battery0: on acpi0 acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 nvidia0: mem 0xd100-0xd1ff,0xb000-0xbfff,0xd000-0xd0ff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: mem 0xd230-0xd2303fff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0 pcib2: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: irq 16 at device 28.1 on pci0 pci4: on pcib3 pcib4: irq 18 at device 28.2 on pci0 pci6: on pcib4 pci6: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcib5: irq 21 at device 28.3 on pci0 pci8: on pcib5 uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIAN
DHCP server questions
Greetings, I am considering modifying my web/email server by adding DHCP server duties to it. Any problems with this idea ? I can reboot the server if I need to without screwing up the clients that already have IP assigned, can't I ? thanks, Darryl ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sendmail problem
On 2007/01/18 10:14, David Banning seems to have typed: > I started by getting this error on startup. > > STARTTLS: ServerCertFile missing Check you /etc/mail/.mc file. You should have something like: define(`CERT_DIR',`')dnl define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/.key')dnl define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/.crt')dnl define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/l.key')dnl define(`confAUTH_OPTIONS', `A,p,y')dnl define(`confTLS_SRV_OPTIONS', `V')dnl You are trying to configure Sendmail with encrypted authentication. You can't just blindly install sendmail if you are running a mailserver. Much reading of the sendmail.org manuals is in your future I would say. The following links helped get me started: http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/auth.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/freebsd/sendmail.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cvsup failed
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:52:00PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > when i use cvsup to update port tree, it always refused by server, like > this: > > Connecting to cvsup.freebsdchina.org > Cannot connect to cvsup.freebsdchina.org: connection refused > ... > > i have change many cvsup server , all of then result in then same, > > what should i do? Check that your firewall is allowing outgoing tcp/5999. -- Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- "Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck" - Curly ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to install the 3945ABG Driver on a fresh FreeBSD 6.2 install?
Hello again, > > I hate to say this but this driver only seems to compile on -CURRENT as > > far as i can tell (and as far as the conversation at > > I don't remember from where I downloaded it, but this one [attached] > works fine on 6-STABLE for me! > make > make install > kldload if_wpi I built it. It works but it complains and sometimes it shuts down itself... That would be nice to know where to report the error messages Jan 18 20:23:59 guenevere kernel: config chan 6 flags 8035 cck f ofdm 15 Jan 18 20:23:59 guenevere kernel: wpi0: link state changed to DOWN Jan 18 20:23:59 guenevere kernel: scan finished Jan 18 20:24:30 guenevere last message repeated 6 times Jan 18 20:24:50 guenevere last message repeated 4 times Jan 18 20:24:55 guenevere kernel: rx tail flags error 702 Jan 18 20:24:55 guenevere kernel: scan finished Jan 18 20:25:26 guenevere last message repeated 6 times Jan 18 20:26:52 guenevere last message repeated 17 times Jan 18 20:26:52 guenevere kernel: config chan 6 flags 8035 cck f ofdm 15 Jan 18 20:26:52 guenevere kernel: config chan 6 flags 8035 Jan 18 20:26:52 guenevere kernel: wpi0: link state changed to UP Jan 18 20:26:59 guenevere dhclient: New IP Address (wpi0): 192.168.1.7 Jan 18 20:26:59 guenevere dhclient: New Subnet Mask (wpi0): 255.255.255.0 Jan 18 20:26:59 guenevere dhclient: New Broadcast Address (wpi0): 192.168.1.255 Jan 18 20:26:59 guenevere dhclient: New Routers (wpi0): 192.168.1.1 Jan 18 20:28:52 guenevere kernel: rx tail flags error 702 Jan 18 20:29:24 guenevere last message repeated 3 times Jan 18 20:31:15 guenevere last message repeated 6 times Daniel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Mobile IPv6
>I would like to ask you a few questions. > I am trying to implement an IPv6 testbed as a part of my thesis. > Following the instructions for the 4.9 release and using 6.2 I tried to > recompile the Kernel but there are not options for IPv6.Does mobile IPv6 > supported by the current release (6.2)? > Do I have to use the snap from KAME project or MIPv6 is already embedded in > the release? > If this is the case, I will have only to manipulate rc.conf and rtadvd.conf. > Is there any guide how I will configure the MIPv6 in the 6.x release? > Respectfully, > Ioannis Kandirakis > PS:my email are :[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sendmail problem
My problem is not with receiving but seems to be only with sending to certain locations. I started by getting this error on startup. STARTTLS: ServerCertFile missing Jan 18 13:52:53 3s1 sm-mta[30650]: started as: /usr/sbin/sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m I learned that someone's mail was not getting delivered I then installed from the ports sendmail-sasl, ran into -more- problems, deinsallled it, then went back to my original install by simply going to /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail and; make clean; make depend; make install It seems be running except emails to certain servers are not accepted. I still get the error; STARTTLS: ServerCertFile missing and now the following error messages, which indicate a refused connection on the target end. Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22894]: STARTTLS: ClientCertFile missing Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22894]: STARTTLS: ClientKeyFile missing Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22894]: STARTTLS: CACertPath missing Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22894]: STARTTLS: CACertFile missing Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22894]: STARTTLS: CRLFile missing Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22894]: STARTTLS=client, init=1 Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22898]: k3OF0cpa014374: SYSERR(root): readqf: ./qfk3OF0cpa014374: incomplete queue file read Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22898]: k3OF1vpa013996: SYSERR(root): readqf: ./qfk3OF1vpa013996: incomplete queue file read Jan 18 13:30:00 3s1 sendmail[22898]: l0IEkjc0043268: makeconnection (cluster3.eu.messagelabs.com. [194.106.220.35]) failed: Connection refused by cluster3.eu.messagelabs. com. Any pointers would be useful. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports - make index fail
Kris Kennaway schrieb: On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:25:58AM -0800, ann kok wrote: Hi all I install 6.2 and update the port by cvsup but i fail to make index Thank you Add delta 1.26 2006.11.27.16.49.49 oliver Shutting down connection to server Finished successfully f62# cd /usr/ports f62# make index Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..perl: not found Install perl. Kris Or run "make fetchindex". Gabor ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports - make index fail
In the last episode (Jan 18), Kris Kennaway said: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:25:58AM -0800, ann kok wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I install 6.2 and update the port by cvsup > > > > but i fail to make index > > > > Thank you > > > > Add delta 1.26 2006.11.27.16.49.49 oliver > > Shutting down connection to server > > Finished successfully > > f62# cd /usr/ports > > f62# make index > > Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..perl: not found > > Install perl. Or run "make fetchindex", which will download a pre-built INDEX file. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports - make index fail
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:25:58AM -0800, ann kok wrote: > Hi all > > I install 6.2 and update the port by cvsup > > but i fail to make index > > Thank you > > Add delta 1.26 2006.11.27.16.49.49 oliver > Shutting down connection to server > Finished successfully > f62# cd /usr/ports > f62# make index > Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..perl: not found Install perl. Kris pgpiCIX8gISbS.pgp Description: PGP signature
ports - make index fail
Hi all I install 6.2 and update the port by cvsup but i fail to make index Thank you Add delta 1.26 2006.11.27.16.49.49 oliver Shutting down connection to server Finished successfully f62# cd /usr/ports f62# make index Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..perl: not found ===> arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed *** Error code 1 perl: not found ===> accessibility/at-poke failed *** Error code 1 2 errors Before reporting this error, verify that you are running a supported version of FreeBSD (see http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/) and that you have a complete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the "ports-all" collection, and have no "refuse" files.) If that is the case, then report the failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] together with relevant details of your ports configuration (including FreeBSD version, your architecture, your environment, and your /etc/make.conf settings, especially compiler flags and WITH/WITHOUT settings). Note: the latest pre-generated version of INDEX may be fetched automatically with "make fetchindex". *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports. *** Error code 1 Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: md5sum is missing, but not entirely
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:29:44AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The command to calculate md5 sums is 'md5', not 'md5sum', > > > and it is part of the base. > ... > > > Not sure why apropos md5 shows md5sum and gmd5sum (g for gnu?), > > > maybe it's from a port. > > > I also suspect that gmd5sum is a link to md5sum or vice versa. > > gmd5sum is indeed from a port, but md5sum does not exist at all > on my system, either as an executable or as a manpage. md5 does > exist, as both an executable and a manpage. Either md5 or gmd5sum > can be used to verify downloads; as someone else mentioned they > produce the same results (although formatted differently). > > > The coreutils package installs the GNU utilities that form the > > basis of Linux distributions - grep, chmod etc. Since most of > > these names clash with the FreeBSD base system, the binaries all > > get renamed with a "g" prefix. The GNU docs still internally > > refer to them with their original names e.g. "man gmd5sum" will > > refer to md5sum > > It still seems like a bug that apropos includes "md5sum(1)" in its > output, when no such manpage exists. Bug in that port's manpage. Talk to the port maintainer or fix it yourself and submit the patch. Kris pgpfZiT0OHhDp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Incorrect kernel time on laptop boot
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:35:43AM +0100, Gilbert Cao wrote: > > Hi the list, > > I currently experienced a problem with my Sony Vaio VGN-FE31B laptop. > Each time I boot, the kernel time seems to be set with the wrong date time. > When I poweroff the machine, wait for some minutes and reboot again, the > kernel time is set with a few seconds after the "wrong" time on shutdown. If you're dual-booting with Windows, the cause is that Windows will set the BIOS to wall-time, while FreeBSD sets the BIOS to UTC. One way to fix this is to run tzsetup and set FreeBSD to run with wall-time. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- If you're right 90% of the time, why quibble about the remaining 3%? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: CVSup core dumping
In the last episode (Jan 18), Firas Kraiem said: > The title says it all, when I try to run CVSup to update my ports > collection (6.2-RELEASE), I get a core dump error : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cvsup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile > Parsing supfile "/root/ports-supfile" > Connecting to cvsup.fr.FreeBSD.org > Connected to cvsup.fr.FreeBSD.org > Server software version: SNAP_16_1h > Negotiating file attribute support > Exchanging collection information > Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection > Running > Fatal error '_longjmp()ing between thread contexts is undefined by POSIX > 1003.1' at line 87 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_jmp.c (errno = > 2) > Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# I didn't think cvsup linked with any threads library, let alone libc_r which hasn't been the default since 5.2. Do you have an LD_PRELOAD environment variable set, or maybe an /etc/libmap.conf file that maps something to libc_r? Since you're sunning cvsup in checkout mode, you might want to try csup, which is a new command in 6.2 and takes the same supfile and command line flags as cvsup does. > If it can be of any help, I've put a copy of my supfile here : > http://fkraiem.free.fr/ports-supfile Probably unrelated to the coredump, but if you're updating ports, you probably want *default release=cvs tag=. in your cvsup file. What you have (tag=RELENG_6_2) will give you the same ports tree that was burned onto the 6.2 CDs, which will never change. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: JDK15 port installation
In the last episode (Jan 18), Alain G. Fabry said: > I'm trying to install the JDK15 port (need a JVM for gallery remote), > but it seems to crash on the mozilla dependancy. Here is the output > where it crashes: Try the diablo-jdk15 port instead; it's a precompiled package. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh public key authentification
On 1/18/07, Christian Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The whole thing should be pretty trivial: I created a key using PuTTY, copied the public key to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys (everthing in one line), chose the private key in PuTTY and tried to log in. All I got in response was: "Server refused out key." Did you copy the displayed "Public key for pasting into OpenSSH" from PuttyGEN, or did you paste the actual contents of the public key? Putty's on-disk format for public keys is not compatible with OpenSSH. -- Noel Jones ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mobile IPv6
john kandirakis wrote: I would like to ask you a few questions. I am trying to implement an IPv6 testbed as a part of my thesis. Following the instructions for the 4.9 release and using 6.2 I tried to recompile the Kernel but there are not options for IPv6.Does mobile IPv6 supported by the current release (6.2)? Do I have to use the snap from KAME project or MIPv6 is already embedded in the release? If this is the case, I will have only to manipulate rc.conf and rtadvd.conf. Is there any guide how I will configure the MIPv6 in the 6.x release? Respectfully, Ioannis Kandirakis err, INET6 has been present since early 3.x (correct me if im wrong), infact its in the generic kernel, so it should just be a case of adding addresses to rc.conf and rtadvd.conf Ta, Joe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh public key authentification
Hello Christian, On 1/18/07, Christian Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi peeps! This may not seem to be a real FreeBSD-issue, but I've gotten this to run on several other machines, just not my Sun running FreeBSD. To clarify this: I haven't really tried this on any other FreeBSD system recently though. I'm probably just to thick to get it right, so go ahead and insult me, if you see the flaw in my scheme. :-) The main idea behind my evil plan is to be able to log into my other computers on the net (LAN) using PuTTY on a Windows-XP box without having to type my password all the time. Don't worry about the security aspect if my key could be stolen, I have taken other measures to avoid that. The whole thing should be pretty trivial: I created a key using PuTTY, copied the public key to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys (everthing in one line), chose the private key in PuTTY and tried to log in. All I got in response was: "Server refused out key." Have you verified the permissions of the authorized_keys file on the server? If you have permissions set too loose (e.g. unneeded read/write permission to groups/other users), sshd may be refusing to trust that file. I went through all the default settings of the sshd (and yes, I did give it a HUP, when I changed the key) and everything checked out as far as I could tell. I had the feeling that PuTTY and the key created by it were the cause, so I created a key with ssh-keygen(1). Same result. What did I miss? If the file permissions seem to be OK, you may want to check for sshd entries in /var/log to see if there is a more verbose error available. You may wish to give this a read (it mostly just covers those points): http://www.freebsddiary.org/ssh-authorized-keys.php Sincerely, -Parker ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
JDK15 port installation
I'm trying to install the JDK15 port (need a JVM for gallery remote), but it seems to crash on the mozilla dependancy. Here is the output where it crashes: c++ -o nsType1.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD6\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DHAVE_DEPENDENT_LIBS -I../.. -I./.. -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/widget -I../../../dist/include/pref -I../../../dist/include/caps -I../../../dist/include/locale -I../../../dist/include/uconv -I../../../dist/include/view -I../../../dist/include/necko -I../../../dist/include/imglib2 -I../../../dist/include/unicharutil -I../../../dist/include/gfx -I../../../dist/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I. -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -DXTHREADS -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../mozilla-config.h nsType1.cpp nsType1.cpp:371: error: invalid conversion from `int (*)(const FT_Vector*, void*)' to `int (*)(FT_Vector*, void*)' nsType1.cpp:371: error: invalid conversion from `int (*)(const FT_Vector*, void*)' to `int (*)(FT_Vector*, void*)' nsType1.cpp:371: error: invalid conversion from `int (*)(const FT_Vector*, const FT_Vector*, void*)' to `int (*)(FT_Vector*, FT_Vector*, void*)' nsType1.cpp:371: error: invalid conversion from `int (*)(const FT_Vector*, const FT_Vector*, const FT_Vector*, void*)' to `int (*)(FT_Vector*, FT_Vector*, FT_Vector*, void*)' gmake[4]: *** [nsType1.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/gfx/src/ps' gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/gfx/src' gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/gfx' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mozilla. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mozilla. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. Can anybody tell me where I can find info on how to solve this problem or provide another option to get gallery remote to work? Thanks in advance, FYI, port distribution is up to date. Alain ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: the flash 9 player....
In an interview, the main linux flash developer hinted that they will start working on flash for FreeBSD if enough requests are made. Sending an email to Adobe is worth the two minutes. For now, I use linux-opera with flash, which works pretty well. On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:27:45 +0100, Robert Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another useful thing would be to write Adobe and (respectfully) request (maintained) native FreeBSD binaries. As this matter gets discussed regularly, check the archives for an address. (You should probably check ports@ and multimedia@ also.) This has only a small chance of producing the desired result; however, without such requests their interest in doing so will be zero. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to install the 3945ABG Driver on a fresh FreeBSD 6.2 install?
Hello Pietro, > > I hate to say this but this driver only seems to compile on -CURRENT as > > far as i can tell (and as far as the conversation at > > I don't remember from where I downloaded it, but this one [attached] > works fine on 6-STABLE for me! > make > make install > kldload if_wpi It did the trick. It seems to work here as well... ;) Thanks! PS: There are many drivers around on the net. That would be nice to indicate where you found that one, coz it seems to work... ;) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
the flash 9 player....
Another useful thing would be to write Adobe and (respectfully) request (maintained) native FreeBSD binaries. As this matter gets discussed regularly, check the archives for an address. (You should probably check ports@ and multimedia@ also.) This has only a small chance of producing the desired result; however, without such requests their interest in doing so will be zero. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Mobile IPv6
I would like to ask you a few questions. I am trying to implement an IPv6 testbed as a part of my thesis. Following the instructions for the 4.9 release and using 6.2 I tried to recompile the Kernel but there are not options for IPv6.Does mobile IPv6 supported by the current release (6.2)? Do I have to use the snap from KAME project or MIPv6 is already embedded in the release? If this is the case, I will have only to manipulate rc.conf and rtadvd.conf. Is there any guide how I will configure the MIPv6 in the 6.x release? Respectfully, Ioannis Kandirakis _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to install the 3945ABG Driver on a fresh FreeBSD 6.2 install?
And that gives... guenevere# make ===> wpi_ucode (all) Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/dev/wpi/wpi_uco de ===> wpi (all) Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/dev/wpi/wpi cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fn o-common -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3d now -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs - Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual - fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c if_wpi.c In file included from if_wpi.c:74: ./if_wpivar.h:19:37: net80211/ieee80211_amrr.h: No such file or directory In file included from if_wpi.c:74: ./if_wpivar.h:115: error: field `amn' has incomplete type ./if_wpivar.h:127: error: field `amrr' has incomplete type if_wpi.c: In function `wpi_rx_intr': if_wpi.c:1324: warning: implicit declaration of function `bpf_peers_present' if_wpi.c:1324: warning: nested extern declaration of `bpf_peers_present' if_wpi.c: In function `wpi_tx_data': if_wpi.c:1677: warning: nested extern declaration of `bpf_peers_present' if_wpi.c:1324: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'bpf_peers_present' if_wpi.c:1324: warning: previous implicit declaration of 'bpf_peers_present' washere if_wpi.c: In function `wpi_start': if_wpi.c:1889: warning: nested extern declaration of `bpf_peers_present' if_wpi.c:1324: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'bpf_peers_present' if_wpi.c:1324: warning: previous implicit declaration of 'bpf_peers_present' washere if_wpi.c: In function `wpi_iter_func': if_wpi.c:2928: warning: implicit declaration of function `ieee80211_amrr_choose' if_wpi.c:2928: warning: nested extern declaration of `ieee80211_amrr_choose' if_wpi.c: In function `wpi_newassoc': if_wpi.c:2952: warning: implicit declaration of function `ieee80211_amrr_node_in it' if_wpi.c:2952: warning: nested extern declaration of `ieee80211_amrr_node_init' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/dev/wpi/wpi. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/dev/wpi. guenevere# > Daniel Tourde wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I found the driver for my wireless card on: > > http://www.clearchain.com/~benjsc/download/20070106-wpi-freebsd.tar.gz > > but how is it supposed to be installed on a fresh FreeBSD 6.2? > > > > Daniel > > You will need to compile the driver then use kldload to load it into the > kernel. See man kldload > > You can then you should be able to load it on boot automatically via > /boot/loader.conf. See man loader.conf > > Hope that helps some. > > Cheers, > > Jeff > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ssh public key authentification
Hi peeps! This may not seem to be a real FreeBSD-issue, but I've gotten this to run on several other machines, just not my Sun running FreeBSD. To clarify this: I haven't really tried this on any other FreeBSD system recently though. I'm probably just to thick to get it right, so go ahead and insult me, if you see the flaw in my scheme. :-) The main idea behind my evil plan is to be able to log into my other computers on the net (LAN) using PuTTY on a Windows-XP box without having to type my password all the time. Don't worry about the security aspect if my key could be stolen, I have taken other measures to avoid that. The whole thing should be pretty trivial: I created a key using PuTTY, copied the public key to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys (everthing in one line), chose the private key in PuTTY and tried to log in. All I got in response was: "Server refused out key." I went through all the default settings of the sshd (and yes, I did give it a HUP, when I changed the key) and everything checked out as far as I could tell. I had the feeling that PuTTY and the key created by it were the cause, so I created a key with ssh-keygen(1). Same result. What did I miss? Regards Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Fwd: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer
-- Forwarded message -- From: Bachilo Dmitry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jan 10, 2007 10:54 PM Subject: Re: WWW Proxy/Traffic Analyzer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org We have an employee who spends quite a bit of time on the net and currently have no way of analyzing where they go. Are there any decent proxy servers that I can put them on to see where they are going? -Tom I have recently installed Dansguardian + Squid onto 6.1-REALEASE. My approach was not as an in-line, but rather transparent mode. Our proxy server is in the DMZ. All outbound http requests from the LAN are redirected at the firewall to the server in the DMZ. This approach eliminates users ability to by-pass the proxy, as no changes to browser settings are made. If the proxy dies, all I need to do (temporarily) is disable the redirector in the firewall. So far, this setup works rather well. There are plenty of free tools for analyzing the logs. The plus for us, by incorporating Dansguardian, is the ability to further customize what is acceptable and what's not. ~ Don ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Flash 9
On 1/17/07, Bachilo Dmitry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: В сообщении от Четверг 18 января 2007 09:15 Naim написал(a): > On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:17:21 -0500 > > "Chad Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I see it in linux compat layer > > > http://www.freshports.org/www/linux-flashplugin9/ ;) > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri > > > Arab Portal > > > http://www.WeArab.Net/ > > > ___ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > Does it work for anyone though? I just installed it and it gets no sound > > or it freezes depending on the site. > > I have the same situation, no sound! > > Best regards, > Rico Don't you guys know? There would not be any sound, because linux flash 9 uses ALSA, not OSS. If there would be some wrapper sometime, we will hear the flash, if there would not be such thing, we would not. -- С уважением, Бачило Дмитрий Руководитель отдела системной интаграции ООО "Компания Солинк" -- With Best Regards, Bachilo Dmitry Head of systems integration dept Solink Company Ltd. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED]" I do see the reason behind the sound under the system requirements at Adobe's website. I am wondering if it is crashing/freezing due to not using RHEL or SUSE as the compatibility layer. Has anyone testing Flash 9 under the default Linux environment and had it work? Has anyone tried it under the Gentoo base in ports and been successful? Or is it failing for everyone else too? Regards, Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What is this mean by this term
Bill Moran wrote: In response to "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: From: "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Dak Ghatikachalam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am confused 2 posters have told me that I am top posting , What do we mean by "top-posting" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_posting And those who are pedantic and whiney about it are pathetic twits. What was the point to that comment? Please don't feed the trolls. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Newbie Libcap Installation Question
When I am trying to install 'ngrep' in UNIX by issuing the 'make install clean' command in the ' /usr/ports/ngrep location ', I got an 'Error code 1'. It also states that there is a dependencies for pcap.2 which is not found in ' /usr/ports/net/libcap ' So, I go to '/usr/ports/net/libcap' - with the intention to issue a 'make install clean' command. However, UNIX gave me a message that there is no such file or directory. Any ideas, how I may be able to install libcap for UNIX? Thanks. Regards, Linux Quest - Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
Hello, Let me preface this mail by saying: I'm an idiot. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, you don't have to say it! I have a piece of networking equipment that does not have a "factory defaults" button on it. it has to be RMA'd and returned to the manufacturer if you can't remember login credentials (forgot username,pass/IP, etc) I was assigning the unit an IP address of 172.20.1.x but I typod it. 127.20.1.x and as you can guess, I can't connect to the unit from any other device now. 127.x is loopback. I have tried assigning a 127.20.1.x address to an ethernet interface in a FreeBSD box, and removinging the 127.0.0.1/8 on localhost. I've also gone into the routing table, and removed all traces of routes for 127.x and finally, *tried* creating a route for 127.20.1.x to go out the ethernet interface (link #2) The problem with everything above is: no matter what ip/subnet combination I use, I get a message (when adding the route) that the network is unreachable. Then, when I try to ping the device from the fbsd box, I get "ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address" My question is: Is it possible in any way, to change the 127 routing to pass out my ethernet card long enough to re-ip this device? I haven't yet come up with a decent solution. Thanks for any thoughts, Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cvsnt setup howto
Anyone got a running cvsnt (built from ports on 6.1release)? Followed their linux wiki exactly, and I get nothing, so I suspect there is something you need to do on bsd? Added cvs-related items to the services file, inetd.conf, rc.conf, and edited the /usr/local/etc/cvsnt/PServer file. Looks like it's not actually running - pserver, sserver, sspi all get nobody home messages when trying to connect from localhost. Anyone setup the :ssh method on bsd? Seems sensible as I have sshd functioning. Do I need to mess around with anything samba related to get sserver working from windows clients (I know I do for sspi obviously), I wouldn't think so, but I've been wrong in such matters before... Thanks, Steve -- Steve Franks, KE7BTE Staff Engineer La Palma Devices, LLC http://www.lapalmadevices.com (520) 312-0089 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: "ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address"
Please disregard the last message, I figured it out. Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How-to build / make / install
On 1/18/07, Don Munyak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How-to build/make/install {disclaimer}...I've been using FreeBSD for about a year, so while I consider myself still a n00b, I'm just not a complete n00b :) OS: 6.1-RELEASE I really need some help building a package for install (if that's the correct terminology). hobbitmon is the next re-named version of big brother http://hobbitmon.sourceforge.net/ I have downloaded the tar.gz file into /usr/local/etc I extracted the tar using: don-bsd# tar xvfz file.tar.gz then I cd in to the directory don-bsd# cd /usr/local/etc/hobbit-4.2.0 The directory listing is as follows: don-bsd# pwd /usr/local/etc/hobbit-4.2.0 [SNIP filelisting] The README says to simply don-bsd# ./configure don-bsd# make don-bsd# make install However, when I type ./configure from /usr/local/etc/hobbit-4.2.0 don-bsd# ./configure Configuration script for Hobbit This script asks a few questions and builds a Makefile to compile Hobbit Checking your make-utility GNU make is required to build Hobbit. If it is available as "gmake", run configure as: 'MAKE=gmake ./configure.server' don-bsd# * Help please, Thanks Have you had a look in the ports tree to see if you can find Hobbit there? Otherwise, gmake is available from ports/devel/gmake, just do cd ports/devel/gmake and make install clean and then you've got it. Then you do MAKE=gmake ./configure-server or whatever in the source catalog for hobbit. The thing that might be weird is that FreeBSD installs ports in /usr/local/[bin,sbin] by default, you'll proably end up with hobbit in /usr/[bin,sbin] if you don't install it from ports. See if you can find a configure parameter to set the install directory to where you want to install hobbit. HTH //Niclas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: the flash 9 player....
Sergio Lenzi writes: > I was just wondering... > > I tested the player of the gnash project... > > seems that a good aproach would get the flv file and > pass it directly to the mplayer using the window-id > > The mplayer than sure decodes the flv file with good > image and sound > > I will spend some time this week on that > I would love to see that work, but sync'ing the audio and video may be problematical. FWIW ... John -- John Conover, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.johncon.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
How-to build / make / install
How-to build/make/install {disclaimer}...I've been using FreeBSD for about a year, so while I consider myself still a n00b, I'm just not a complete n00b :) OS: 6.1-RELEASE I really need some help building a package for install (if that's the correct terminology). hobbitmon is the next re-named version of big brother http://hobbitmon.sourceforge.net/ I have downloaded the tar.gz file into /usr/local/etc I extracted the tar using: don-bsd# tar xvfz file.tar.gz then I cd in to the directory don-bsd# cd /usr/local/etc/hobbit-4.2.0 The directory listing is as follows: don-bsd# pwd /usr/local/etc/hobbit-4.2.0 don-bsd# ls -la total 164 drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel512 Jan 18 09:38 . drwxr-xr-x 20 root wheel 1536 Jan 18 09:48 .. -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 17983 Aug 9 16:10 COPYING -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1585 Aug 9 16:10 CREDITS -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 69402 Aug 9 16:10 Changes -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3303 Aug 9 16:10 README -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5063 Aug 9 16:10 README.CLIENT -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9290 Aug 9 16:10 RELEASENOTES drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Aug 9 16:10 bbdisplay drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Aug 9 16:19 bbnet drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel512 Aug 9 16:10 bbproxy drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1536 Jan 17 17:01 build drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Aug 9 16:10 client drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Aug 9 16:10 common -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel431 Aug 9 16:10 configure -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6005 Aug 9 16:10 configure.client -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14018 Aug 9 16:10 configure.server drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel512 Aug 9 16:10 contrib drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 1024 Aug 9 16:10 debian drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel512 Aug 9 16:10 demotool drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 1536 Aug 9 16:10 docs drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 1536 Aug 9 16:10 hobbitd drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel512 Aug 9 16:10 include drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2048 Aug 9 16:10 lib drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel512 Aug 9 16:10 rpm drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2048 Aug 9 16:10 web don-bsd# The README says to simply don-bsd# ./configure don-bsd# make don-bsd# make install However, when I type ./configure from /usr/local/etc/hobbit-4.2.0 don-bsd# ./configure Configuration script for Hobbit This script asks a few questions and builds a Makefile to compile Hobbit Checking your make-utility GNU make is required to build Hobbit. If it is available as "gmake", run configure as: 'MAKE=gmake ./configure.server' don-bsd# * Help please, Thanks ~Don ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
the flash 9 player....
I was just wondering... I tested the player of the gnash project... seems that a good aproach would get the flv file and pass it directly to the mplayer using the window-id The mplayer than sure decodes the flv file with good image and sound I will spend some time this week on that Lenzi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: (no subject)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:17:20 -0800 (PST) anup roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what is the differents beteween E1 link and PRI link. > why we use E1 link and why we use PRI link ? PRI is an ISDN interface that can run on top of an E1. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: partition labeler and 6.2-powerpc
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:11:52AM -0600, Jonathan Horne wrote: > i realize this is not the powerpc list, but before i go and register for > yet one more email-list... > > last night i was attempting to install 6.2 on a G4 cube i have. (6.0 > would not install, it would only panic when loading the kernel from the > install disc). 6.2 seemed to make it all the way to the partition label > editor, but i could not delete the existing linux partitions. i would > like to remove those ext3 partitions, and replace them with the FreeBSD > default partition setup. when i hit D, i get a message something like > "that function is not used here right now" or something to that effect. I haven't had time to try out a 6.2 yet and don't hae that hardware anyway. But, in the part of install _before_ the actual 'partition editor' (eg bsdlabel) which would be the slice editor (eg fdisk) you have to explicitly delete those slices to have them available to be included if I recall properly. There is an option in the fdisk portion of things that says something like 'make the whole disk a single FreeBSD slice' (it might actually still say partition - some errors seem hard to get rid of). Anyway, choose that option and also chose making the slice bootable. Then go on to creating partitions. If nothing seems to work, then boot in to the fixit and do: dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/ad0 bs=512 count=65 and then start the install over again. Oh, if you are trying to save some existing slice or partition information on the drive, that won't work, but your post sounds like you are trying to make the whole disk be a FreeBSD disk. jerry > > can anyone on this list have any experience with powerpc freebsd? > > cheers, > jonathan > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Does Firefox run on the SPARC64 port of FreeBSD?
Michael Johnson wrote: > Firefox only runs on >= 601101 sparc64. I am guessing that means a special revision of the UltraSPARC II processor, but I don't really know, because google gets a lot of hits, mainly explaining all sorts of soft that seems to have the same problem, but none of these hits really explain the meaning behind this. So even though this is getting a little OT: In English, please! Regards Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD challenged by Internet
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:43:49 + RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The OP said that there was no problem with linux and windows, Correction: "the OP said that there was no problem with linux" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Does Firefox run on the SPARC64 port of FreeBSD?
On 1/16/07, Christian Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings fellow computer haters! :-) As I have already written on the STABLE mailing list, I can't seem to get Firefox to start on my Sun U60. Thunderbird works fine (as far as I can tell after two days), but Firefox just exits instantly with a segfault. I didn't get any replies from the STABLE list, but I got a few ideas from a German newsgroup. On of these ideas was that Firefox may not run at all unter FreeBSD SPARC64. The reason given was that outside of the common plattforms (i386, AMD64 and maybe alpha) much of the ports world is untestet. To be honest, I find that a little hard to believe for Firefox. If we were talking about some application that is rarely used at all, sure. But Firefox should be quite common - one would think anyway. Well, just to rule out this possibility, I tought I'd just ask around if anyone got Firefox to run on FreeBSD 6.1 SPARC64. Hit me with answers! :-) Firefox only runs on >= 601101 sparc64. Regards Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD challenged by Internet
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:43:02 -0800 "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, these companies simply > cannot afford to put their best programming and design > talent on solving things like slow DNS resolver queries > through their proxy, when these problems are reported. The OP said that there was no problem with linux and windows, and that's consistent with what I saw on my d-link ADSL router. Presumably FreeBSD is doing something slightly different. I wouldn't have expected these things to be tested against *BSD, but you would think that OS-X would behave like FreeBSD. > Yet, do the customers that actually have these devices, > after going through 2 or 3 of them in that many years, > actually stop one day and say "Gee, I'm really stupid > to keep urinating my money away on these cheezy > little routers when I could spend $600 on a nice new > Cisco 800 series and get expert Cisco support on it, and > it would work and I could then just forget about it" Draytek is a useful halfway house for domestic and soho use - I've never heard anyone have a bad word to say about their wired dsl-routers. Cisco is overkill for most people. > config your DSL modem out of routing mode and into bridging > mode. That's doesn't really buy you all that much, cheap hardware isn't going to be more reliable in bridged-mode. DNS proxy problems are not a big deal since it's easy to manually configure servers, or turn-on recursive lookups. It does eliminate the problems that some NAT routers have with large numbers of simultaneous connections though. These problems is particularly acute in countries where PPPoA is the norm. FreeBSD has no significant support for usb or pci PPPoA modems, that leaves us with routers, half-bridge modems, and full-bridging (where the ISP supports PPPoE over atm). And these bridged modems are really just adapted nat-routers. I do envy Linux's support for pci PPPoA modems. > Anyway, I think you should have availed yourself of your ISP's > tech support department first. And if your ISP's support > department stinks - some unfortunately do - then drop service > and get a better one. There's plenty more ISP's in the > phone book. I doubt there is any reasonably priced ISP that will help in troubleshooting a problem that's not reproducible on Windows. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Does Firefox run on the SPARC64 port of FreeBSD?
John Nielsen wrote: > I installed FreeBSD on an Ultra 5 sometime last year and I had Firefox > (probably 1.5 or earlier) working just fine. Lucky you! :-) > I don't have the machine up right now to tinker with, though. That would have been an interesting test. > Are you running the latest -stable on the box? Yes (as of 2 days ago). > If you don't get enough help on this list, you could also try the sparc64 > list. It's true that some things in the sparc64 port don't get tested as > much as they do in other ports of FreeBSD, but there are enough users that > common programs such as Firefox should be expected to work. Apart from your post, there wasn't anything else. :-( I'll try the other mailing list. Regards Chris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
CVSup core dumping
Hi to all of you The title says it all, when I try to run CVSup to update my ports collection (6.2-RELEASE), I get a core dump error : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cvsup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile Parsing supfile "/root/ports-supfile" Connecting to cvsup.fr.FreeBSD.org Connected to cvsup.fr.FreeBSD.org Server software version: SNAP_16_1h Negotiating file attribute support Exchanging collection information Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection Running Fatal error '_longjmp()ing between thread contexts is undefined by POSIX 1003.1' at line 87 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_jmp.c (errno = 2) Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# If it can be of any help, I've put a copy of my supfile here : http://fkraiem.free.fr/ports-supfile Any help would be much appreciated Firas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Slow Terminal Switching
Hi, In my new install 6.2, I have come across a strange problem. It takes a few seconds to switch between virtual terminals. I press alt f2 or f3 etc and it takes a few instances for the terminal to switch. It used to be instantaneous. Can anyone give me a pointer on this one? thanks G ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(no subject)
what is the differents beteween E1 link and PRI link. why we use E1 link and why we use PRI link ? thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
partition labeler and 6.2-powerpc
i realize this is not the powerpc list, but before i go and register for yet one more email-list... last night i was attempting to install 6.2 on a G4 cube i have. (6.0 would not install, it would only panic when loading the kernel from the install disc). 6.2 seemed to make it all the way to the partition label editor, but i could not delete the existing linux partitions. i would like to remove those ext3 partitions, and replace them with the FreeBSD default partition setup. when i hit D, i get a message something like "that function is not used here right now" or something to that effect. can anyone on this list have any experience with powerpc freebsd? cheers, jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"