This is an important point, and begs the obvious question: Are we
responsible for what our government does?
(Let me push Tyler away from the keyboard...fortunately he seems to be most
active when I am asleep...)
If I pay my taxes, aren't I to some extent funding the war effort?
Of course, one
At 11:54 AM -0800 on 4/3/03, Tim May wrote:
> (I don't claim to be perfect--there are times when I have used the
> words "we" and "our" in connection with the United States. But I've
> also used "we" and "our" in terms of what the Founders very obviously
> meant, in contrast to what later rule
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 01:02 PM, Harmon Seaver wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:22:09AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
YHWH is the Tetragrammaton. Jews (and some others) believe the name of
their god may not not be spoken. Vowels are usually left out in
Semitic
languages, with sometimes placehol
At 1:51 PM -0800 4/3/03, Tim May wrote:
>On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 12:56 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
>
>> At 11:54 AM -0800 4/3/03, Tim May wrote:
>>> If my neighbor wishes to contribute to the Ruwandans or the Iraqi
>>> Liberation Front, he is welcome to.
>>
>> Operation Iraqi Liberation has a be
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 05:06 AM, Sunder wrote:
http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,58326,00.html
Ex-Intel VP Fights for Detainee
By Leander Kahney
02:00 AM Apr. 03, 2003 PT
Friends of an Intel programmer who is being held in a federal prison
can't
help but shake their heads in
The other was an actual change in the name of the
city, from "Northern Plains" to "Northern Capitol".
This analysis doesn't explain everything. Modern Mandarin (which into its
current form early in the 20th century), along with its linguistic northern
predecessor has no sound such as "king", thou
At 11:54 AM -0800 4/3/03, Tim May wrote:
>If my neighbor wishes to contribute to the Ruwandans or the Iraqi
>Liberation Front, he is welcome to.
Operation Iraqi Liberation has a better acronym.
Cheers - Bill
-
Bill Frantz
> Sarad AV[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> helo,
>
> > Hilarious, dude. Who got nukes first? India.
> Nope US did.
> India got after US and before pakistan.Pak claims to
> have nukes since 1983,though they were tested only in
> 1999-his report comes frm pakistan.
>
For those to young to remem
It was so simple! They should have done this years ago...
Reminds me of a friend that was on a standards commmittee. The committee
generated a time requirement for some kind of satellite signal to be sent,
and the requirement meant that light speed would be broken.
In response, my friend wrote
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 11:37 AM, Kevin S. Van Horn wrote:
Tyler Durden wrote:
As far as I can tell, we've been actively meddling in foreign
governments since the early 1950s.
I haven't been; have you? If not, then you shouldn't use the term
"we".
One of the mind games that state wors
--
> > > If Russia, Chaina and the EU really wanted to, they could
> > > use conventional weapons and force the US to at least
> > > retreat from trying to rule the world.
James A. Donald:
> > This supposes the US is trying to rule the world, which is
> > not apparent -- at least not to the
> Harmon Seaver[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:12:53AM -0600, Kevin S. Van Horn wrote:
> > Harmon Seaver wrote:
> >
> > >Translate/transliterate is irrelevant -- you don't change people's
> names,
> > >
> > Ever hear of King Ferdinand of Spain? His real name was, of course
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 11:43 AM, Kevin S. Van Horn wrote:
Harmon Seaver wrote:
Ever hear of King Ferdinand of Spain? His real name was, of course,
Fernando -- Ferdinand is merely the English equivalent. Likewise,
English and Spanish speakers use different names for the same
explorer
We offer some 27 documents on Citibank PIN cracking banned
by the British High Court on 20 February 2003:
http://cryptome.org/citi-ban.htm
Included are the gagging order, affidavits of defendant cryptographers
and affidavits of Citibank officials and security personnel.
See related message by
What Chomsky says below is no suprise to most of those on this list,
left/right/other. What IS of interest is that fact that a universal
consensus seems to be emerging about the US's role in the world, and Chomsky
articulates this sentiment.
-TD
(from www.zmag.org)
IRAQ
Noam Chomsky , Univer
Operation American Freedom has gained a powerful new ally, as Senator
John Kerry of Massachussets is now calling for "regime change" in
Washington, D.C.
Dug-in on the other side of the river, the criminal Bush regime is
protected by the elite Republican Guard. And they are known to possess
we
Harmon Seaver wrote:
> You
> don't translate names. Especially you don't change the name of the god. Read the
> Old Testament, see how incredibly many times you find phrases like "the holy
> name of the lord", "blessed be the name", "the wonderful name", etc.
You don't even know the difference be
"Kevin S. Van Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I can think of several entirely ethical uses of nuclear weapons, with the
>usage not motivated by hate but simple utility:
>
>1. You have a large invading fleet approaching your nation. A few nukes out
>in the middle of the ocean could handily take
Right, we won't use nukes, we'll just use 'depleted' uranium core
artillery, thermobaric bunker busters (aka mini-nukes), daisy cutters and
MOABS; After all, those aren't weapons of mass destruction.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/y
>The suicide bombers will come here entirely on their own
> for the most part,
> or perhaps with the help of Al-queda type groups. There will
> be no country to
> retaliate against. That alone could easily send us into a
But that wouldn't be a good escape for a govt: mind your pawns
(er, ci
helo,
>
> Hilarious, dude. Who got nukes first? India.
Nope US did.
India got after US and before pakistan.Pak claims to
have nukes since 1983,though they were tested only in
1999-his report comes frm pakistan.
>
> See your own propoganda site,
US is not the only counrty who can do that :-)
Dumbass! - Have you ever heard of April fools?
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
\|/ :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:Instead of rewarding|m
At 07:15 AM 3/31/03 +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
For very-low-bandwidth data transfers hidden in wideband streams, we could
maybe use timing of packets. Wouldn't work with more congested networks,
and would need some kind of REALLY heavy-duty error correction, but could
be rather difficult to spo
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:45:55AM +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
> Harmon Seaver wrote:
>
> > You
> > don't translate names. Especially you don't change the name of the god. Read the
> > Old Testament, see how incredibly many times you find phrases like "the holy
> > name of the lord", "blessed be the n
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt
excerpt:
1. Introduction
Firewalls [CBR03], packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and
the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that
have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. The problem
is that
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Damian Gerow wrote:
> The list can go on and on. The US is *not* a popular country right now.
> Not only could I see Mexico turning a blind eye, but I can see a large part
> of the world taking the same stance.
>
> I agree wholeheartedly with what you're saying. The US, I'd l
> 4. Interplanetary transportation of a massive payload. Project Orion,
> anyone?
Don't forget a more realistic scenario: an asteroid on a collision course.
Another use can be quick construction of large underground storage tanks
for gas or oil.
Or extracting the rest of oil from almost empty o
Harmon Seaver wrote:
No, they weren't "christian" -- they were followers of Rabbi Yeshua ben
Yoseph ha Natzri, later called Mesheach ha Israel. [...] Jesus and
Christ and christianity were something invented by the europeans [...] [Marcion] took
a scissors and cut out anything that was at all fav
> > If Russia, Chaina and the EU really wanted to, they could use
> > conventional weapons and force the US to at least retreat
> > from trying to rule the world.
>
> This supposes the US is trying to rule the world, which is not
> apparent -- at least not to the US.
I am afraid it's more than ju
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 07:05 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 1 Apr 2003 at 11:48, Mike Rosing wrote:
Which is why MAD works. But a regular bombing run on a few
oil refineries would put the US in a world of hurt really
quickly, enough for them to pull a lot of their troops out of
pl
hi,
Why are the suicide bombers after US troops-its the
hate.It does work .Yesterday at najaf(iraq)-a family
of 8 women and atleast 2 children were killed by
allied troops.They claimed that the vehicle sped
towards an allied check post.So they fired warning
shots to *stop* the vehicle.
When it di
At 01:05 AM 4/3/2003 +0200, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
> Relying on httpd operators to protect those who access is plain silly,
> even if echelon (funny how that word dropped below radar lately) did
> not exist.
Echelon could be grouped together with Carnivore and CALEA devices into
the group of Generi
John Young wrote:
Ben,
Would you care to comment for publication on web logging
described in these two files:
http://cryptome.org/no-logs.htm
http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm
Cryptome invites comments from others who know the capabilities
of servers to log or not, and other means for pr
On 2 Apr 2003 at 22:02, Kevin S. Van Horn wrote:
>
> "Christer establishment"? Are you out of your mind? We're talking
> about a country where a big stink was raised just because someone found
> the word "god" on a spelling list.
This is irrelevant.You are looking at specifcs of court or
hi,
yes-thats probabaly why they nuked hirsoshima and
nagasaki.
Dont undermine the hate.There was no logic
either.There was no logic in nuking thousand of people
in hirsohma saying their existance is less important
to thousands of people who might live,if the city was
nuked.
Sarath.
Damian Gerow wrote:
I can only see two reasons for bombing with
nuclear weapons: hate and stupidity.
That being said, you'd have to *really* hate someone (or an entire country) to actually /use/ a nuclear weapon.
That's nonsense. I can think of several entirely ethical uses of
nuclear weapons,
Harmon Seaver wrote:
If you read the history, there were just as many christer theologists and ministers arguing *for* slavery as there were against.
Their religion was not the cause of their support for slavery;
self-interest was. On the other hand, many, many abolitionists became
devoted to t
Bill Frantz writes:
> The http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm URL says:
>
> >Low resolution data in most cases is intended to be sufficient for
> >marketing analyses. It may take the form of IP addresses that have been
> >subjected to a one way hash, to refer URLs that exclude information other
>
--
On 1 Apr 2003 at 11:48, Mike Rosing wrote:
> Which is why MAD works. But a regular bombing run on a few
> oil refineries would put the US in a world of hurt really
> quickly, enough for them to pull a lot of their troops out of
> places that happen to be too close to Russia and China.
>
--
On 1 Apr 2003 at 11:48, Mike Rosing wrote:
> Which is why MAD works. But a regular bombing run on a few
> oil refineries would put the US in a world of hurt really
> quickly, enough for them to pull a lot of their troops out of
> places that happen to be too close to Russia and China.
>
40 matches
Mail list logo