Re: [digitalradio] Which Digi Program ??

Forgot to add: 83 yrs, 3/4 brain cell. At 07:17 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote: MIXW w/Kenwood TS 440SAT. In service for at least 5 years. No interface. Direct from 440 to XP computer. 73 At 07:07 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote: . . Hello Happy Hams After returning to Amateur Radio after a v

Re: [digitalradio] Which Digi Program ??

MIXW w/Kenwood TS 440SAT. In service for at least 5 years. No interface. Direct from 440 to XP computer. 73 At 07:07 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote: . . Hello Happy Hams After returning to Amateur Radio after a very long absence, I am 'messing about' with digital modes - all of which are tota

Re: [digitalradio] QRV RFSM-8000 tonight

RFSM8000 v.54 is now available from http://rfsm2400.radioscanner.ru/ Regards Les VK2DSG On 12/10/2009 12:45 PM, Jose A. Amador wrote: I called and beaconed using v. 0.536 on 7077.0 KHz USB and nothing happened. Jose, CO2JA obrienaj escribió: > I will be operating RFSM-8000 toni

Re: [digitalradio] The most used software?

And I am told by some of the people who ran/run a beta copy of the new Microsoft coming out that it is/will be compatible with the XP programs and really works well. Time will tell but is something to possibly look forward to. At 11:46 AM 10/10/2009, you wrote: Interesting and great questi

Re: [digitalradio] Radio for 30 Meters.?????

Flex Radio At 08:58 AM 10/9/2009, you wrote: On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:28:22PM -, ve3hsc wrote: > Who makes the BEST radio for 30 meters. That's a "how long is a piece of string?" question, OM. Best with respect to what qualities? Sensitivity, audio quality, filtering, DSP, tolerance of

Re: [digitalradio] New 40m Band Plan

Read Note 2 Les VK2DSG Laurie, VK3AMA wrote: Sorry, I bit quick with that last email. I should have scrolled to the bottom of the page, NB=Narrow Band modes are listed on other bands. Still not the best for Region-3 ops. 40M phone down to 7030, 80M phone down to 3535 with no digital

Re: [digitalradio] Digest Number 4291

Amateur Radio Digital Mode Discussion In the US 144.076 and 50.076 are CW Only. -- 73 -- Les, W4FRA Re: JT65A on 17 & 30M Posted by: "expeditionradio" expeditionra...@yahoo.com expeditionradio Mon Jun 1, 2009 10:05 am (PDT) http://hflink.com/jt65/ JT65A HF Frequen

Re: [Fwd: Re: [digitalradio] Easypal in MARS]

Les Keppie wrote: I have forwarded your email on to Erik VK4AES for information and got this reply Hi Les, Well, that is a surprise. I made a few changes from the MARS group requests, but never hear any reply to see if it is what they want. The missing "FileOK" in the waterfall

[digitalradio] CT-62 cable with USB

=96eeceb4971a3eadba23f33a13d15d7a Les VK2DSG

Re: [digitalradio] Re: on 14.109 USB all day (Q15X25) - please read about FEC ..

when conditions improve and when the newer mode of WINMOR becomes available Regards Les VK2DSG John Becker, WØJAB wrote: Bonnie, I ran both on 14,109 till I starting seeing the QRM from ALE. I really think that is the reason that you or anyone else sees no MT63 there. I first started with ALE

Re: [digitalradio] Re: on 14.109 USB all day (Q15X25) - please read about FEC ..

Bonnie One would also respectfully ask why the 24/7 Global Emcomm group would choose to run their system on a known MT63 frequency of long standing - I guess we all should keep in mind that no one group has any claim to ANY frequency and to expect QRM from others should be the norm Les VK2DSG

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM file transfer

a lot better on VHF Regards Les VK2DSG From: Tommi Holopainen Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 6:04 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM file transfer Hello Just wondering has anybody else tryed transfer quite big files on HF with RFSM or some other mode?. We just

Re: [digitalradio] TNC Suggestion Requested

Oh? NMCM is using Pactor 1 and my "ancient" KAM is working well on the circuit. The latest and greatest is NOT always necessary. Nice, Yes, but not necessary. And yes, I can also receive Pactor 1 with MIXW2. Les/NNN0KTM WA At 04:24 PM 9/15/2008, you wrote: Already own MixW.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: CW - last resort?

Go to Africa and learn the drums. They work too and are effective over a large area. At 03:28 PM 6/1/2008, you wrote: Could be true Chuck. I guess to take it just a step further, we need to ask Simon to start looking into writing another mode into his great software to decode/operate the ham

Re: [digitalradio] Vista

That is what I did when the opportunity came up to get a new laptop but loaded with VISTA. Wiped it totally and loaded XP w/2. Works great. Have found nothing so far that it would not do. Les At 03:28 PM 3/24/2008, you wrote: I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can&#

[digitalradio] Propneter's stepping on each other.

would be decoded and reported. Les, W3GXT

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Operating FSK RTTY in a contest ?

That smell and those sounds will never be forgotten. Too bad the brats have no chance to experience them, 15, 19, etcLoops - reminiscing 73 Les At 07:30 AM 2/12/2008, you wrote: --- In <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Ch

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Thanks Much!!! At 04:45 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 6:59 PM, Les Warriner <<mailto:leswa7ham%40earthlink.net>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!! Les, the main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR: <ht

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New release (4.7) of MULTIPSK

Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!! 73 Les At 02:05 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote: Frank, I will see if I can find this on a Vista computer. One other solution would be to see what happens with a test program (with a lot of flags). If you are interested

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE Sounding and How does it work?

Now, 20 million + 1 73 At 08:05 PM 1/11/2008, you wrote: If the statement below is False, why are there not more call signs showing up on the main ALE frequencies? I can leave my rig on 14109.5 or 10145.5 for 24 hours and only see, at most 4 or 5 stations? Ditto for the ALE website

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Emergency agencies/ ham equipment/ hams in emcomm

some beard growth and you'll rapidly change your mind. 73 Les At 08:13 AM 1/11/2008, jgorman01 wrote: --- In <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Alan Barrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ""snip"" > > I person

[digitalradio] [Fwd: Re: [multipsk] ALE Sounding : what is it and how does it work]

One other thing - there will be NO beacon to tell you that the server is there - you will have to try to connect to VK2DSG to see if you can raise it Regards Les John Bradley wrote: > > > > RFSM8000 gets very little mention on these reflectors, since hams in the > US

[digitalradio] RFSM8000

Merry Christmas to all from VK2DSG > http://rfsm2400.radioscanner.ru/ «RFSM-2400»-project is transformed to new project - «RFSM-8000» "RFSM-8000" by the "RFSM-IDE Group". What is it? This is a shareware, sound card based, 'R'adio 'F'requency 'S'oftware 'M'odem. Its purpose: Simply connect two

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital opposition, QRM on PACTOR PMBOS now from DAVE, Congrats

is more commercial than hobby. 73 Les At 01:36 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote: +++ more AA6YQ comments below --- In <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Demetre SV1UY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>QRM from PMBOs and other deaf

Re: [digitalradio] RE: RM11392

uperior" Pactor advocates, but haven't seen any evidence of any effort to do so, just over the top alarmism about stifling innovation. -- 73 -- Les, W4FRA - Original Message - From: radionut To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007

[digitalradio] beacon running on 18106 dial - RFSM8000 non standard from 0930 utc

beacon from vk2dsg

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 10 MHz Amateur Radio balloon to Cross the Atlantic

We are supposedly adults and having passed the test, know the rules. BUT: There are always those who: I am a member of NavyMarineCorpMARS and we have people who come out of the ham bands, well out and cannot be a mistake, and interfere with NMCM traffic and make what they think are wise re

[digitalradio] Re: JT65 / WSTJ / USB SignaLink

Hi Brian Your audio settings are now right, does your PTT LED light when you try to transmit? I found with mine I had to set the playback mixer Wave level fairly high and to make the PTT more reliable I put the link on JP4. Les G3VYZ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Brian&quo

[digitalradio] [Fwd: Beacon running]

SHOULD HAVE SAID FREQ 14109.5 KHZ Original Message From: - Sun Oct 28 17:44:12 2007 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 0080 X-Mozilla-Keys: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:44:11 +1100 From: Les Keppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Repl

[digitalradio] Beacon running

Hi All I shall run my RFSM8000 beacon in non-standard mode from 0645 utc for 2 hours Email address in included in beacon Les VK2DSG

[digitalradio] Re: 30m 2.8KHz wide digital signal QRM

o the OHR with 50Hz line spacing that I usually see and I believe originates from Cyprus. Les G3VYZ

[digitalradio] Re: 30m 2.8KHz wide digital signal QRM

x27;s been very quiet on the band around 10.137 to 10.142MHz. Les G3VYZ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "merv0728" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Les, I listened yesterday as I said I would but heard nothing of > note except for some hash that was switching on &a

[digitalradio] Re: 30m 2.8KHz wide digital signal QRM

during the morning of the 24th. This morning there was another digital signal on the same frequency using a different mode, it switched off at 08:03utc and I've heard nothing since. Les G3VYZ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[digitalradio] Re: 30m 2.8KHz wide digital signal QRM

I don't know the source of this one Rich but thankfully the transmissions stopped sometime before 13:00 UTC today after at least two days without a break. I am now able to resume my activity on 30m without constant QRM. Les G3VYZ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "rich" &l

[digitalradio] Re: 30m 2.8KHz wide digital signal QRM

Yes but the signal is only heard between 10137.450KHz and 10140.200KHz. At the moment, 19:21UTC, I can only hear the strongest station at S9 with a 30 second burst every three minutes. Les --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rein Couperus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have on

[digitalradio] Re: 30m 2.8KHz wide digital signal QRM

Hi Alan, one transmission is very strong at this time, 19:11UTC, the other responding station is much weaker. They are being heard all around Europe at various times of the day but not sure where else at the moment. I get the feeling that the transmissions are 24 hours a day. Les --- In

[digitalradio] 30m 2.8KHz wide digital signal QRM

for long periods of time. Les G3VYZ

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Need to Expand the HF Auto Band Segments

What planet do you live on? The CB'ers started a plan called REACT which proved to be an excellent program, is very much in use today, and to read their plan and the ARRL EMCOM course, it is difficult to tell the difference. Best that you should line your ducks up before starting to shoot.

Re: [digitalradio] New emcomm tool now available

Naw, they'd never do that. Maybe it is because they believe in the rule of being of assistance to their fellow man. After more than 50 years of emergency service, military, civilian, Amateur, etc., until you have walked in our footsteps, watch your insults. At 08:16 AM 10/18/2007, you wrote

Re: [digitalradio] Only using wide digital modes

Your statement was that you would increase power to interfere with him/her deliberately. At 09:36 AM 10/14/2007, you wrote: Les Warriner wrote: > > And is strictly illegal by Part 97. 5 KW linears are available. > Want the address? No wonder why Hollingsworth spends so muc

Re: [digitalradio] Only using wide digital modes

And is strictly illegal by Part 97. 5 KW linears are available. Want the address? No wonder why Hollingsworth spends so much time in California. At 08:32 AM 10/14/2007, you wrote: Rick wrote: > > Demetre, > > What you are recommending is completely unacceptable to 99.9% of all > hams. >

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000

Hi All I will be sending a beacon transmission every 10 mins for the next two hours (till 0415 utc) using non standard modulation on 14109.5 khz - with beam at USA/VE Hope someone may hear it - maybe a bit too hopeful hi Regards Les VK2DSG John Bradley wrote: > Tnx fer the note, How

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE , J65, Pactor 1 thru ?, etc.

Lots of words, no intelligence for those of us struggling with the programs. At 04:14 PM 10/3/2007, you wrote: On 10/3/07, Les Warriner <<mailto:leswa7ham%40earthlink.net>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Certainly an education and informative excha

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE , J65, Pactor 1 thru ?, etc.

Certainly an education and informative exchange? How about some informatgion instead? Moderator? At 02:41 PM 10/3/2007, you wrote: >>>AA6YQ comments below --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >snip< By your o

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000

wnload link > http://rfsm2400.radioscanner.ru/download/rfsm2400_v0498.zip Regards Les VK2DSG

[digitalradio] Re: Absolute best case transfer - NON STANDARD MODE - Bandwidth .3 to 2.7 khz

Hi Robert Sorry about delay - lost some mail due change of server had to go to digitalradio group to find this email of yours Will see if I can do this - may take a few days Regards Les --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > C

[digitalradio] See previous post

Hi All Sorry - forgot to put this bit in de les 'TEST1' complete current part of file, new part: 2 - 30/09/2007 - 1:34:59 PM File 'AERO 101.JPG' received succesfully, all time 495 sec, average speed 4123 bits/sec - 30/09/2007 - 1:35:50 PM Disconnected from 'TEST1' - 30/09/2007 - 1:36:06 PM

[digitalradio] Absolute best case transfer - NON STANDARD MODE - Bandwidth .3 to 2.7 khz

Hi All Here are the figures for a file transfer done from TEST1 to VK2DSG on the same computer and using the same radio so we have absolute max S/N ratioup to 31 db Regards Les VK2DSG VK2DSG > Connecting to 'TEST1'... - 30/09/2007 - 1:26:19 PM > Connected to 'TEST1&

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM2400 vs. PC-ALE

Howard Brown wrote: > Les, can you comment on Rick's question about PTT via CAT? > > I know that RFSM2400 keys my PTT via my Rigblaster but I > guess Rick wants it to key the rig via the data port??? > > Howard K5HB > Some Kenwood models already catered for - and ther

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM2400 vs. PC-ALE

Waterfall" (colored/grayed) view (for registered users ONLY). > > And all features from «RFSM-2400» (available without registration): > - user chat (keyboard to keyboard); > - download a file from the remote users DOWNLOAD directory; > - upload a file to the remote users UPLOAD directo

[Fwd: [Fwd: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM8000]]

1, good info: 0, good arq: 10 / 370, bad packs: 0. Transeive block, mode 4000 long - 28/09/2007 - 1:19:31 PM Sended 191 packets Receive block, mode 1000 long, S/N: 16 (16/17) - 28/09/2007 - 1:20:11 PM All packs: 7, good info: 0, good arq: 6 / 205, bad packs: 0. Rick wrote: > Les, >

[digitalradio] RFSM8000

Hi All Maybe some of you Digital Data movers would like to look here Les http://rfsm2400.radioscanner.ru/

Re: [digitalradio] EasyPal New Version 21/sep/07

Probbly because that file is no longer there just go to the KC1CS site - then the digital page and download the latest version there de les . wrote: > Andrew; > > The URL does not work. > > 73 > > Omar YK1AO > > > - Original Message - &g

[digitalradio] [Fwd: [Fwd: Re[2]: RFSM-8000]]

I might try this again since I didnt see it come out on the group last time Les vk2dsg Original Message From: - Wed Sep 19 09:14:20 2007 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 0080 X-Mozilla-Keys: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:14:16 +100

[digitalradio] [Fwd: Re[2]: RFSM-8000]

Original Message From: - Tue Sep 18 08:38:18 2007 From: Dmitry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, Les. Please, help me. I have not information about control commands for transceivers "Yaesu". If you can give

Re: [digitalradio] Unidentified signal

That is a USAF MARS frequency. At 04:22 PM 5/15/2007, you wrote: Anyone else hearing the digital-sounding signal on 13985.5 USB?. S5 here... -- Andy K3UK Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73 www.obriensweb.com

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM2400 in ZL

Hi from Les VK2DSG Would also like to make known that on 80m the vk digital section of the band is 3620 to 3640 - 3.6375 is used by a number of people using and debugging Easy_pal which is new (DRM) programme being written by Erik VK4AES - this programme can be used for picture transfer

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM2400 in ZL]

Hi from Les VK2DSG You will not make any friends using wide RFSM transmissions down at 7030 to 7040 or even anywhere below 7100 even though the bandplan says transmissions up to 2khz may be used 7040 to 7100 is the prime operating area for ssb DX and local ragchew operations I would suggest

Re: [digitalradio] Global Standard Re: 141A

Look at the new Linux OS: http://www.consumerfaffairs.com/news04/2007/ubuntu_review.html There may be light at the end of the tunnel after all At 05:14 PM 5/6/2007, you wrote: > Is this app operating system neutral or is > it dependent on a single OS? > Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E Hi Doc, 14

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Off-topic, but any help appreciated

You are correct and you do not have to deal with people in India to get help. There is a book out, "The world is flat", that very well explains what is going on in the hi-tech companies. At 10:51 AM 4/28/2007, you wrote: >Hi Dave: >I have no lost love for Gateway. but even worst yet is Dell..

Re: [digitalradio] Digital 7MHz World Bandplans Comparison

Hi Bonnie Google New Australian 7 MHz Band Plan Regards Les VK2DSG expeditionradio wrote: > Here is a current list of 7MHz world bandplans for comparison. It is > interesting to note the apparent common worldwide segment for 500Hz > bandwidth digital texting/data at 703

Re: [digitalradio] Re: sked

> 235900 2 3/28 VK2DSG WD4KPD FM151 0 > > UTC Date: 2007 Apr 05 > - > 00 Transmitting: JT65A RRR (Shorthand) > 37 Transmitting: JT65A 73

Re: [digitalradio] sked

> Hi David Am transmitting 14.076127 approx from 2320 utc 5th That is now hihi de Les vk2dsg

Re: [digitalradio] VK2DSG JT65

KT2Q wrote: > Les, > > Copy your test message on 20 meters... > > 020200 2 -8 7.4 -525 3 * TEST VK2DSG Q > 1 0 > > Tony KT2Q > > > > Hi Tony Thanks for the email report Here no decode from you so far as callsigns go but did get the followin

Re: [digitalradio] FCC Announcement

How can you say so much with your tongue firmly implanted in your cheek? I hope anyway... At 09:44 AM 3/31/2007, you wrote: FCC Announcement It was announced today that Kellogg's and the Federal Communications Commission have signed a pact to issue Amateur Radio Licenses on specially marked

RE: [digitalradio] Re: CQ CH?

And if you are describing an "incident" where a tornado has touched down you can certainly make sure that the people in the emergency operations center know exactly what you are talking - sorry keying - about and the location abbreviated. We learned the hard way in Korea and Viet Nam spell i

RE: [digitalradio] Re: CQ CH?

Horse Feathers. From 50 years of experience - military and civilian At 07:01 AM 3/21/2007, you wrote: I really don’t want to start a CW vs anything war here – really I DON’T.. but you are dead wrong on CW – it is faster to talk with CW than with voice and you can QSK – that is what is was i

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM2400

John Bradley wrote: > > will be on 14109.5 USB starting at about 1400Z, and will be on for a while > since I have a lot of computer work to do tomorrow > > regards > > John > VE5MU > Les VK2DSG IS IN BEACON MODE ON 14109.5 FROM 0445Z 19TH FOR 2 HOURS - ANTENNA PO

Re: [digitalradio] "legal Mode" guidelines

es or not. > > It should be to the point and concise; something > like... > > 1. The mode must have an open and published > protocol. > 2. The mode can not exceed 300 baud when used in > the digital subbands. > > etc... > > Tony -- KT2Q > > &g

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM-2400

o. wrote: > Hi group > > Where can I download theRFSM software from? > http://rfsm2400.aanesland.com/

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM-2400

What did Ham Radio do before the Internet E-Mail? At 03:51 PM 3/15/2007, you wrote: Hi Jaun, Can sked with you on 20 meters: it's 22:50z. Try 14109.5? Tony KT2Q - Original Message - From: "Juan Carlos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM-2400 Email features

Howard Brown wrote: > Hello Les and Group, > > I exchanged emails with Dmitry, built a clean Windows system and > installed version 0.492. Now I can connect, chat and exchange files > with the other station OK. > > How about the email features? Does anyone know how that

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

PM 3/11/2007, you wrote: Wait! WWV and WWVB transmit UTC time codes. There is absolutely no way for either station to 'know' in which time zone your atomic clock is located. So How could they correct time for DST??? Enlighten me please 73, Chuck/AA5J At 09:00 PM 3/11/2007, Le

Re: [digitalradio] What's with Boulder?

Whoops. Yes, they do correct time for DST and standard time. My clocks, atomic clock controlled, changed at 1 AM EDT by gaining an hour. My UTC clock did not change - thankfully!!! At 04:45 PM 3/11/2007, you wrote: Hello There, WWV has always gone by UTC. UTC has no Daylight Savings Time

Re: [digitalradio] RFSM-2400 Setup Assist

scope but no connect. I can hear him > answering my polls but no result. We went through the configuration > page and are sure that all options are configured the same. > > Any ideas where we went wrong here? > > Thanks for any ideas you send. > > Howard K5HB > >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Why still the W1AW CW non-listening stuff on 3.580?

They drive teachers bonkers with it. They will never cease using it. But they also use many other digital modes. 73 Les At 12:42 PM 2/19/2007, you wrote: Charlie, No reasonable person can deny that the FCC no longer considers CW a necessary skill for radio amateurs to have. At one time it was

RE: [digitalradio] Ten-Tec Jupiter

And my Pegasus with the W(N?)4PY software will work right along side them!! ($850.00) many years ago. 73 Les At 01:43 PM 2/12/2007, you wrote: Thanks for the comments. The Jupiter now cost $1495 without an antenna tuner. The SDR-1000 now cost $1499 without an antenna tuner. The IC-746PRO

Re: [digitalradio] Re: US Hams Codeless Feb 23

quire, to be able to conduct emergency communications? My soap box is creaking so I'll just continue as we are and have been doing. I learned also long ago that you do not easily change minds. 73 Les I am sure it will be similar to the pent up demand we had when the Technician lic

Re: [digitalradio] US Hams Codeless Feb 23

Ah Common. Just because we're old - - - -At 04:39 PM 1/21/2007, you wrote: Hello folks, Speaking of tests the next time you visit the doctor remember he has a practice. So pick an old fart that has practiced on somebody else first!! Everybody has to start somewhere. Later Brad N1NPK

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE Receiving

Hi Bonnie Can you set up to sound on a specific channel without going to scan mode - I would just like to leave it sound on 7102 only - to see if I can hear anyone on that channel only de les vk2dsg > > Also, I'm glad to see that Les VK2DSG is on the air. > Two days ago, Les

Re: [digitalradio] HAMPAL PROBLEM

David Uninstall Windows Defender - Reinstall Hampal - then Reinstall Windows Defender de les vk2dsg - Original Message - From: David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD To: DIGITALRADIO Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 1:44 AM Subject: [digitalradio] HAMPAL PROBLEM HELP NEEDED

[Fwd: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Field Day and PSK31]

L[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SSTVPAL_PLUS/ http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~crac Hampal and Hamswap can be downloaded from the above site Regards Les VK2DSG John Bradley wrote: > > simply put, it's too expensive, and we do not have an

Re: [digitalradio] Digital SSTV?

cant get it from that site let me know and I shall email it to you de les vk2dsg The CAT PTT control is ready for a bit of testing. It has only been tested with the FT-847, FT-920 and FT-1000 D. Most of the others should work. I am not sure about the KENWOOD rigs. At least KENWOOD has made all

[digitalradio] CAT commands for FT920

Does anyone know the CAT commands for the FT920 for PTT ON and PTT OFF Les VK2DSG Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/ Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Calling all experimenters ( A Proposal)

necessary bandwidth not exceeding 16 kHz   -   This restriction for FM Les VK2DSG dshults wrote: If you are speaking of semi-automatic stations, that's correct. They too are authorized to operate where you mentioned as long as the bandwidth is <500 Hz. The last known "rouge" aut

Re: [digitalradio]

As a matter of interest the first tests with the Olivia mode were made on 05 dec04 in the following format - from OH/DK4ZC to VK2DSG on 14101.5 using 400mw to 2 el quad - here is a copy of the RX text at VK2DSG - It doesnt look much like Olivia as we know it today de les vk2dsg MFSK log on

[digitalradio] Winter digital net

I would like to suggest using 30 meters, it has very very litle cativity, just a few infrequent packet and pactor stations. Stay off of obvious commerical stations and made use of that waste land, it beats the voice qrm on 40 meters. 73, W3GXT Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --

Re: [digitalradio] CQ MT63 14109.5

KT2Q wrote: Les (VK2DSG)   Calling you now on 14109.5 (03:30Z)   Tony KT2Q   - Original Message - From: Les Keppie To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 11:14 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CQ MT63

Re: [digitalradio] CQ MT63 14109.5

KT2Q wrote: All:   CQ MT63 14109.5 -- beaming west..    Tony KT2Q I use a Macro like this CQ CQ CQ de    CQ CQ CQ de AT ON LOCAL TIME USING  CENTRE FREQ MIXW THIS AUTOCQ IS TIMED AT 60 SEC INTERVALS to produce the cq below      ( In MixW)   CQ CQ

Re: [digitalradio] CQ MT63 14109.5

KT2Q wrote: All:   CQ MT63 14109.5 -- beaming west..    Tony KT2Q   CQ CQ DE KT2Q KT2Q CQ CQ DE KT2Q KT2Q PSE KKK  copied sometime prior to 0313 utc - no time stamp on cq so dont know what time it was sent but I guess sometime in the last hour de les vk2dsg